Volume 1 Supplement 1

BioSysBio 2007: Systems Biology, Bioinformatics, Synthetic Biology

Open Access

DNA interaction with sperm cells: ODE model

BMC Systems Biology20071(Suppl 1):P42

DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-1-S1-P42

Published: 8 May 2007


A computer simulation concerning initial events in the sperm/DNA interaction was performed. DNA binding with MHCII and CD4 proteins, DNA internalization into spermatozoa, and DNase activity in sperm were described by first order differential equations (ODE). The dynamics of the system depended on the parameters of the model. The simulation could explain controversial results in sperm mediated gene transfer research and posed this phenomenon to an unknown form of biological evolution.


The phenomenon of foreign gene transfer with sperm was first observed in lab conditions in 1971 [1]. Since 1989 [2, 3], when sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT) was rediscovered, some unusual molecular mechanisms in spermatozoa were described, such as the ability of sperm cells to capture exogenous DNA [4] and RNA [5] molecules, the reverse transcriptase activity in sperm cells [6], the insertion of foreign nucleic acids into sperm chromatin [7] and an apoptosis-like response to the high concentration of internalized DNA [8]. SMGT has been seen as a mechanism for genome destabilization [9] and evolution [10]. In this work the dynamics of sperm/DNA interaction was investigated by computer simulation.


The structural model of sperm/DNA interaction (Figure 1) was used to describe the problem. I assumed free foreign DNA, complexes of DNA with MHCII and CD4 proteins, DNA compartmentalization in the sperm cell, DNase activities in the seminal fluid and in the spermatozoon. The DNA flow between nodes was described by the first order differential equations: See Figure 1.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of protein/DNA interactions in sperm cell

where, variable S1 is free DNA, S2 is MHCII bound DNA, S3 is CD4 bound DNA, S4 is foreign DNA in the sperm cell, variables S5 and S6 are DNAs cleaved by DNases outside and inside sperm cells respectively. Ratios of parameters k-1 = k4 = 0.1 were not varied; values of parameters k5 and k6 were changed during 'physiological' experiments with DNase activities: k5 = {0, 1}, k6 = {0, 0.1, 1}; the coefficients k1, k2, k12, k3 were changed in 'genetic' experiments and in the simulation of IF-1 block: k1 = {0, 1}, k2 = k12 = k3 = {0, 0.1}. The initial conditions were 1 for input DNA (S1 = 1) and 0 for all DNA binding contents, {S2,...,S6} = 0. Combinations of parameter values were investigated by the simulation.


I speculated about an interaction between MHCII and CD4 molecules and about the release of a part of the DNA from spermatozoa by CD4 recycling. However, the model of foreign DNA stream in spermatozoa was in good agreement with experiments for sperm/DNA interaction. The modeling described some stages of DNA penetration into a sperm cell: delay phase, DNA internalization, plateau, and decrease of internal DNA content. I obtained the fast MHCII/DNA interaction by simulation, because the high value of k1 = 1 was used, which corresponded to a strong chemical binding. In addition, the fine dynamics of DNA distribution between the participants-MHCII and CD4 proteins-in the course of sperm/DNA interaction was shown. This hidden mechanism was not revealed in biochemical investigations. Modeling with DNase activities demonstrated their significance in SMGT. The simulation showed that DNases in seminal fluid did not fully prevent the penetration of foreign DNA into spermatozoa. According to the model, the IF-1 protection leads to a significant decline of foreign DNA in sperm cells. I achieved a total suppression of sperm/DNA interaction in the case of both IF-1 presence and DNase activity in the seminal fluid. In addition, the internal DNase activities evoked degradation of captured DNA. Artificial elimination of components from SP/DNA transport pathway in the virtual knockout experiments demonstrated the sufficient role of MHCII molecules in sperm/DNA interaction, as well as the participation of CD4 receptors in the internalization of DNA into spermatozoa. Surprisingly, the disconnection of MHCII and CD4 proteins (k2 = 0) had a more significant effect on DNA internalization than simple MHCII block (k1 = 0); the amounts of DNA in sperm cells at steady states were 0.08 and 0.33 respectively.


I suppose the equilibrium state, which corresponds to sperm/DNA block, is a special case that might easily be disturbed and have unusual consequences. A large set of variations for parameters in the SMGT model caused 'leaky' states, where a part of exogenous DNA could penetrate sperm cells. These events could have taken place in nature and might have led to the foreign DNA penetration into spermatozoa. This kind of lateral gene transfer could be one of mechanisms for the compositional evolution of Eukaryotes [11].

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Biology III, Albert-Ludwig's University Freiburg


  1. Brackett BG, Baranska W, Sawicki W, Koprowski H: Uptake of heterologous genome by mammalian spermatozoa and its transfer to ova through fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971, 68 (2): 353-357. 10.1073/pnas.68.2.353PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Arezzo F: Sea urchin sperm as a vector of foreign genetic information. Cell Biol Intern Rept. 1989, 13 (4): 391-404. 10.1016/0309-1651(89)90166-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lavitrano M, Camaioni A, Fazio VM, Dolci S, Farace MG, Spadafora C: Sperm cells as vectors for introducing foreign DNA into eggs: genetic transformation of mice. Cell. 1989, 57 (5): 717-723. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90787-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lavitrano M, French D, Zani M, Frati L, Spadafora C: The interaction between exogenous DNA and sperm cells. Mol Reprod Dev. 1992, 31 (3): 161-169. 10.1002/mrd.1080310302PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Giordano R, Magnano AR, Zaccagnini G, Pittoggi C, Moscufo N, Lorenzini R, Spadafora C: Reverse transcriptase activity in mature spermatozoa of mouse. J Cell Biol. 2000, 148 (6): 1107-1113. 10.1083/jcb.148.6.1107PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sciamanna I, Barberi L, Martire A, Pittoggi C, Beraldi R, Giordano R, Magnano AR, Hogdson C, Spadafora C: Sperm endogenous reverse transcriptase as mediator of new genetic information. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 312 (4): 1039-1046. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.024PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zoraqi G, Spadafora C: Integration of foreign DNA sequences into mouse sperm genome. DNA Cell Biol. 1997, 16 (3): 291-300. 10.1089/dna.1997.16.291PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Maione B, Pittoggi C, Achene L, Lorenzini R, Spadafora C: Activation of endogenous nucleases in mature sperm cells upon interaction with exogenous DNA. DNA Cell Biol. 1997, 16 (9): 1087-1097. 10.1089/dna.1997.16.1087PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith KR: The role of sperm-mediated gene transfer in genome mutation and evolution. Med Hypotheses. 2002, 59 (4): 433-437. Review. 10.1016/S0306-9877(02)00150-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuznetsov AV, Kuznetsova IV, Schit IY: DNA interaction with rabbit sperm cells and its transfer into ova in vitro and in vivo. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000, 56 (2 Suppl): 292-297. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200006)56:2+<292::AID-MRD18>3.0.CO;2-ZPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Watson RA: Compositional Evolution: The Impact of Sex, Symbiosis, and Modularity on the Gradualist Framework of Evolution. (Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology) A Bradford Book. 2006, 324-Google Scholar


© Kuznetsov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.