Open Access

Exploring the metabolic network of the epidemic pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 via genome-scale reconstruction

  • Kechi Fang1,
  • Hansheng Zhao1, 2,
  • Changyue Sun1,
  • Carolyn MC Lam3,
  • Suhua Chang1, 4,
  • Kunlin Zhang1,
  • Gurudutta Panda3,
  • Miguel Godinho3, 5,
  • Vítor AP Martins dos Santos3, 6Email author and
  • Jing Wang1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Systems Biology20115:83

DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-83

Received: 18 November 2010

Accepted: 25 May 2011

Published: 25 May 2011

Abstract

Background

Burkholderia cenocepacia is a threatening nosocomial epidemic pathogen in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) or a compromised immune system. Its high level of antibiotic resistance is an increasing concern in treatments against its infection. Strain B. cenocepacia J2315 is the most infectious isolate from CF patients. There is a strong demand to reconstruct a genome-scale metabolic network of B. cenocepacia J2315 to systematically analyze its metabolic capabilities and its virulence traits, and to search for potential clinical therapy targets.

Results

We reconstructed the genome-scale metabolic network of B. cenocepacia J2315. An iterative reconstruction process led to the establishment of a robust model, i KF1028, which accounts for 1,028 genes, 859 internal reactions, and 834 metabolites. The model i KF1028 captures important metabolic capabilities of B. cenocepacia J2315 with a particular focus on the biosyntheses of key metabolic virulence factors to assist in understanding the mechanism of disease infection and identifying potential drug targets. The model was tested through BIOLOG assays. Based on the model, the genome annotation of B. cenocepacia J2315 was refined and 24 genes were properly re-annotated. Gene and enzyme essentiality were analyzed to provide further insights into the genome function and architecture. A total of 45 essential enzymes were identified as potential therapeutic targets.

Conclusions

As the first genome-scale metabolic network of B. cenocepacia J2315, i KF1028 allows a systematic study of the metabolic properties of B. cenocepacia and its key metabolic virulence factors affecting the CF community. The model can be used as a discovery tool to design novel drugs against diseases caused by this notorious pathogen.

Background

Burkholderia cenocepacia is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen and formerly Genomovar III of Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc). The Bcc comprises at least 17 taxonomically related species [13], which have developed diverse niches from the natural environment [4] and humans as they have emerged as pathogens in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), chronic granulomatous disease, and in immunocompromised individuals [5]. B. cenocepacia is the dominant Bcc species in patients with CF, accounting for between 50% and 80% of the infection cases [5]. It also causes many instances of non-CF clinical infections, such as for cancer patients [6, 7]. As a representative isolate for the spread of an epidemic CF strain, B. cenocepacia J2315 belongs to a clonal lineage known as ET12, which is of increased transmissibility and dominates fatal infections among CF patients in the United Kingdom and Canada [812]. B. cenocepacia J2315 is notorious for its high resistance to the majority of clinically useful antimicrobial agents [6, 13], including antimicrobial peptides [14, 15]. Yet the mechanisms of host infection and drug resistance remain mostly unknown.

The genome of B. cenocepacia J2315 has been sequenced and recently annotated [13]. It is one of the largest Gram-negative genomes consisting of three circular chromosomes with 3.8, 3.2 and 0.8 million base pairs (Mb) respectively and a plasmid. Its complex genome encodes a broad range of metabolic capabilities, and numerous virulence and drug resistance functions that allow it to survive under a variety of conditions and invade immunocompromised individuals. It is vital to develop a systems-level metabolic model for this opportunistic human pathogen to explore and gain insights into its versatile metabolic capability and disease-causing mechanism, and eventually aid in finding potential clinical therapeutic targets. The genome-scale metabolic reconstruction enables integration of genomic information with metabolic activities observed in phenotypic experiments and other "omics" measurements to elicit hidden biological knowledge that would have been otherwise difficult to obtain.

In this study, we presented the manually curated genome-scale metabolic network of B. cenocepacia J2315, named as i KF1028, which accounts for the major metabolic pathways for the synthesis of each component of biomass and for the degradation of common biologically important carbon sources. Syntheses pathways for key virulence factors highly associated with metabolism were particularly emphasized and reconstructed. The in silico model was validated by performing BIOLOG substrate utilization assays, which can test the ability of a microorganism to oxidize various substrates simultaneously [16]. Model-driven analysis and discoveries, including refinement of gene annotation, and gene and enzyme essentiality, were carried out to define the architecture of the genome-wide metabolic and transport network and assist the identification of potential drug targets. Model i KF1028 provides researchers a framework to explore and understand the global metabolism of B. cenocepacia J2315 and its key metabolic virulence factors affecting CF patients upon infection. It allows a broad spectrum of basic and practical applications, especially the application for drug design which may open new doors for anti-infection strategies.

Results and discussion

Characteristics of the genome-scale metabolic network of B. cenocepacia J2315

The genome-scale reconstructed metabolic model of B. cenocepacia J2315, referred by the conventional naming rules [17] as i KF1028, consists of 859 internal reactions (including transport) and 834 metabolites. The reconstruction accounts for 1,028 genes, covering 14.4% of the 7,116 protein coding genes identified from whole genome sequencing (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome?term=burkholderia%20cenocepacia%20J2315). The model i KF1028 includes all major pathways required for cell growth and the degradation of common biologically important carbon sources of B. cenocepacia. Apart from these central metabolic pathways, model i KF1028 also includes pathways associated with key metabolic virulence factors, which provides insights into how the system-level metabolic properties affect pathogenicity. For an overview, the properties of the J2315 genome and the reconstructed model i KF1028 were summarized in Table 1. Genome-scale metabolic models have been successfully used to study many pathogenic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus[1820], Acinetobacter baumannii[21], Mycobacterium tuberculosis[22], Salmonella typhimurium[23], and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[24]. A basic comparison between the model i KF1028 and the above five recently published metabolic reconstructions is also illustrated in Table 1. Schematic representation of the metabolic network of B. cenocepacia J2315 with key metabolic virulence factors is shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 enumerates the metabolic pathways included in i KF1028 and, for each pathway, the number of reactions with assigned and non-assigned genes. The high ratio of gene-associated reactions shows that the reconstructed metabolic model of B. cenocepacia J2315 is reliable. [Additional file 1 for i KF1028 and Additional file 2 is in SBML format]
Table 1

Comparison of properties of reconstructed metabolic network for selected pathogens

Model

N.A.*

AbyMBEL891

i NJ661

i RR1083

i MO1056

i KF1028

Genome size

2.8 Mb

3.93 Mb

4.4 Mb

4.8 Mb

6.3 Mb

8.1 Mb

Included genes

758

650

661

1,083

1,056

1,028

Total reactions

1,497

891

939

1,087

883

859

Gene-associated reactions (% of total reactions)

1,278

713 (80%)

723 (77%)

1,018 (93.7%)

839 (95%)

832 (96.9%)

Non-gene-associated reactions

219

46

216

69

44

27

Transport reactions

146

130

93

230

133

102

Metabolites

1,431

778

828

744

760

834

Properties of metabolic reconstruction of B. cenocepacia J2315 (iKF1028) were compared with other published metabolic reconstructions of pathogenic microbes, S. aureus N315 (2009) [18] (which is the improvement of the N315 reconstruction by Becker and Palsson 2005 [19], and Heinermann et al. 2005 [20]), A. baumannii AYE (AbyMBEL891) (2010) [21], M. tuberculosis H37Rv (iNJ661) (2007) [22], S. typhimurium LT2 (iRR1083) (2009) [23], and P. aeruginosa PAO1 (iMO1056) (2008) [24]. *: Not available for the reconstruction of S. aureus N315.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-0509-5-83/MediaObjects/12918_2010_Article_690_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the metabolic network in B. cenocepacia J2315, referred as model i KF1028.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-0509-5-83/MediaObjects/12918_2010_Article_690_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Metabolic pathways included in i KF1028 and the distribution of gene-associated and non-gene-associated reactions for each pathway.

Metabolic virulence factors in model i KF1028

The success of B. cenocepacia as a pathogen originates from the ability of its large genome to encode numerous virulence mechanisms [13], including quorum sensing (QS) [2530], siderophores-based iron uptake systems [3133], cable pili and adhesion [3436], motility [37, 38], hemolysin [39], ZmpA and ZmpB proteases [4042], phospholipases [43], secretion systems [4446], lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [15, 4749], and extracellular capsule [50]. Syntheses of the key metabolic virulence factors of these virulent mechanisms, namely QS, LPS and rhamnolipids, were incorporated and analyzed in i KF1028. Table 2 lists the virulence-associated pathways and the required proteins and precursors for syntheses of virulence factors in each pathway.
Table 2

Virulence factors incorporated in the metabolic network reconstruction of B. cenocepacia J2315

Virulence factors

Proteins involved

Major metabolic precursors

Lipopolysaccharide components

  

   Lipid A

LpxA, LpxB, LpxC, LpxD, LpxH, LpxK, KdsA, KdsB, KdsC, KdtA, KdoO, HtrB

O2,

UDP-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine,

(R)-3-Hydroxytetradecanoyl-ACP,

(R)-3-Hydroxyhexadecanoyl-ACP,

Myristoyl-ACP,

D-arabinose 5-phosphate,

Phosphoenolpyruvate,

   Core oligosaccharide

GmhA, RfaE, GmhB, HldD, RmlD, WbiI, WaaC, WaaF, WabP, WabR, WabO, WabS, WaaL

Sedoheptulose 7-phosphate,

UDP-glucose,

UDP-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine,

dTDP-4-dehydro-6-deoxy-L-mannose,

L-Alanine

   Ara4N modification

ArnA1, ArnA2, ArnB, ArnC, ArnT

L-Glutamate,

10-Formyltetrahydrofolate,

UDPglucuronate

Quorum sensing

  

   AHLs

CepI, CciI

S-adenosyl-L-methionine,

Octanoyl-ACP,

Hexanoyl-ACP

   HHQ

KynA, KynB, KynU, PqsA, PqsB, PqsC, PqsD

L-Tryptophan,

3-oxodecanoyl-ACP

   BDSF

RpfF, FadA, FadB, FadH

(S)-Hydroxydecanoyl-CoA

Rhamnolipids

RhlA, RhlB, RhlC, PhaC

dTDP-4-dehydro-6-deoxy-L-mannose,

(R)-3-Hydroxydecanoyl-ACP

Ara4N, 4-amino-4-deoxy-arabinose; AHLs, N-acylhomoserine lactones; HHQ, 2-heptyl-4-quinolone; BDSF, cis-2-dodecenoic acid

The LPS produced by B. cenocepacia J2315 has an important role in both disease aetiology and antibiotic resistance [51, 52]. LPS usually consists of three components: lipid A, core oligosaccharide, and O antigen. Although there were some studies on characterizing the features of LPS in B. cenocepacia, all these studies focused on a certain part/component of LPS. So far, there is no systematic elucidation of the LPS structure and composition specifically for B. cenocepacia strain J2315, nor any global analysis on its biosynthesis process of the LPS. In this study, we depicted the detailed features of the complete LPS structure in B. cenocepacia J2315 by integrating all available reports on LPS. We also reconstructed the LPS-synthesis pathways supplemented with all necessary proteins involved and major metabolic precursors, as illustrated in Figure 3. According to our study, in J2315, each of the three components has a very unique feature. The lipid A portion is modified by an additional Ara4N residue [49, 53], which had been shown to reduce the binding of cationic antibiotics and was proposed as a potential drug target [54]. The inner core oligosaccharide contains an unusual KDO-KO-Ara4N residue instead of the typical KDO-KDO residue [15, 51, 55]. The outer core comprises various polysaccharides including L-glycero-D-manno-heptose, glucose, galactose, quinovosamine, and rhamnose [51]. The O-antigen portion of LPS in J2315 was interrupted by an insertion element in BCAL3125 [47, 56]. These differences might indicate the reason why strain J2315 is of remarkably distinct activity.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-0509-5-83/MediaObjects/12918_2010_Article_690_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Specific structure of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in B. cenocepacia J2315 and the synthesis pathways of LPS as well as the proteins involved. The lipid A portion of LPS is composed of two linked glucosamine residues (purple hexagon) with fatty acid side chains (wavy lines), (R)-3-hydroxyhexadecanoic (C16:0 (3-OH)) in an amide linkage and (R)-3-hydroxytetradecanoic (C14:0 (3-OH)) acid and tetradecanoic acid (C14:0) in an ester linkage. There are 4-amino-4-deoxyarabinose (Ara4N, brown sphere) moieties attached to the phosphate residues in the lipid A backbone. The inner core oligosaccharide contains unusual KDO-KO-Ara4N residue linked to the lipid A (KDO: 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid, dark blue hexagon; KO: D-glycero-D-talo-octulosonic acid, light blue hexagon). Various polysaccharides comprise the outer core oligosaccharide (L-glycero-D-manno-heptose, blue heptagon; glucose, dark green hexagon; galactose, light green hexagon; quinovosamine, orange hexagon; rhamnose, red hexagon). J2315 cannot make complete LPS O-antigen, owing to an insertion element in BCAL3125 [47].

B. cenocepacia strains possess multiple quorum sensing systems, which regulate the expression of versatile virulence determinants, such as biofilm formation and motility. Strain J2315 owns the ability to synthesize and recognize three types of chemical signals used for cell-to-cell communication: N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs), 4-quinolones (4Qs), and the DSF-like molecule cis-2-dodecenoic acid (BDSF). Two AHLs-based QS systems have been found in J2315, namely CciIR and CepIR [25, 57], which can both produce N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL) and N-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C8-HSL) signals using acyl side chain (Hexanoyl-ACP and Octanoyl-ACP, respectively) and S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) as precursors [58]. The CepIR system is conserved in all species of the Bcc. The CciIR system is encoded within a pathogenicity island, designated as the B. cenocepacia island (cci), which was the first time that cell-signalling genes were found on a genomic island [59]. The 4Qs-based signal, the 2-heptyl-4-quinolone (HHQ), is produced by B. cenocepacia strains [26]. HHQ is the precursor of 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone (PQS) [60] and its synthesis requires four proteins: PqsA, PqsB, PqsC, and PqsD. It had been reported that the exported HHQ from B. cenocepacia can be recognized by Pseudomonas aeruginosa within which HHQ is converted into PQS which is one of the QS signals for P. aeruginosa[26], highlighting the possibility of inter-species communication during the CF co-infection caused by P. aeruginosa and B. cenocepacia. BDSF is a newly discovered signal molecule produced by B. cenocepacia[28]. The synthesis of BDSF requires the gene BCAM0581 [29].

The synthesis pathway of rhamnolipids was also reconstructed in i KF1028. Although there has not been any report demonstrating that B. cenocepacia can produce rhamnolipid, Dubeau et al demonstrated that Burkholderia thailandensis has the orthologs of rhlA, rhlB, and rhlC, which are responsible for the biosynthesis of rhamnolipids in P. aeruginosa[61]. By protein similarity search against the UniProt database, proteins coded by genes BCAM2340, BCAM2338, and BCAM2336 in B. cenocepacia J2315 were identified as highly similar in sequence to rhlA, rhlB, and rhlC in both B. thailandensis (with BLAST E value of 1E-121, 1E-173, and 1E-108, respectively) and P. aeruginosa (with BLAST E value of 3E-60, 7E-98, and 1E-67, respectively). This facilitates us to hypothesize that B. cenocepacia can potentially generate rhamnolipids. Further experimental investigations are needed.

Model validation and gap-filling using phenotype data

BIOLOG substrates utilization assays for B. cenocepacia J2315 were performed in triplicates in order to validate and refine the model. In silico growth on various substrates was simulated by setting each of them as sole carbon source and its uptake rate to 10 mmol/gcell/h under aerobic conditions based on M9 minimal medium. The simulation was performed on the ToBiN platform by flux balance analysis, as described in Methods. Of the 95 carbon sources tested, 40 could be directly compared with the in silico model of B. cenocepacia J2315, i KF1028. Preliminary disagreement between BIOLOG assays and in silico predictions were probably due to metabolic gaps, improper gene annotations and unacquainted transporters. These discrepancies were checked through gap analysis and literature mining. After continuous gap-filling and network refinement, the overall prediction accuracy was improved to 87.5%, a value that supported i KF1028 as being a proper reconstruction of the B. cenocepacia J2315 core metabolism (comparison results are showed in Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison with the BIOLOG substrates utilization assays

Class

Carbon source

BIOLOG results

In silico prediction

Agreement

Carbohydrates

N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

D-Galactose

Growth

Growth

yes

 

α-D-Glucose

Growth

Growth

yes

 

m-Inositol

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

Sucrose

Growth

Growth

yes

 

D-Trehalose

Growth

Growth

yes

Carboxylic acids

Acetic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

cis-Aconitic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

Citric acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

D-Gluconic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

β-Hydroxybutyric acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

α-Ketoglutaric acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

D,L-Lactic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

Malonic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

Propionic acid

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

Quinic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

D-Saccharic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

Succinic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

Amino acids

L-Alanine

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Asparagine

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Aspartic acid

No Growth

Growth

no

 

L-Glutamic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Histidine

Growth

Growth

yes

 

Hydroxy-L-proline

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Leucine

No Growth

Growth

no

 

L-Ornithine

No Growth

Growth

no

 

L-Phenylalanine

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Proline

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Pyroglutamic Acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Serine

Growth

Growth

yes

 

L-Threonine

No Growth

Growth

no

 

D,L-Carnitine

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

γ-Aminobutyric acid

Growth

Growth

yes

Miscellaneous

Succinamic acid

Growth

Growth

yes

 

Uridine

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

Thymidine

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

Putrescine

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

2,3-Butanediol

No Growth

No Growth

yes

 

Glycerol

No Growth

Growth

no

 

D-Glucose-6-Phosphate

Growth

Growth

yes

Of the remaining 55 carbon sources tested, 14 were indirectly compared with the model due to the missing knowledge of whether the transport mechanisms of these compounds exist in J2315 or not. Initially, all those 14 carbon sources showed a no-growth phenotype both in silico and in the BIOLOG assays. Then we made the assumption that each of these carbon sources could be transported into the cell (i.e. to function as intracellular compounds) and re-tested whether the in silico model can grow on each of them. The results showed that 11 of the 14 carbon sources enabled i KF1028 to grow after applying the above assumption. This supports the hypothesis that J2315 lacks of transporters for all those 11 carbon sources, even though their catabolic pathways are complete. For the rest 3 carbon sources, the agreement between the in silico results and BIOLOG assays remained.

As the catabolism of the remaining 41 carbon sources out of 55 has not been well studied and information regarding their role in the cell could not be found in public resources, these 41 carbon sources cannot be analyzed in our model. (Complete comparison results with BIOLOG assays are supplied in the Additional file 3)

Model-driven refinement of genome annotation

The reconstruction of metabolic network allowed the identification and refinement of improperly annotated genes of B. cenocepacia J2315 from the public biological databases. Careful effort was made in this work to rectify the current genome annotation based on metabolic gap analysis, BLAST searches, BIOLOG substrate utilization assays, and literature mining. The full list of refinement of genome annotation derived from the genome-scale metabolic reconstruction is shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Proposed annotation refinements

Gene Locus

Current Annotation (Burkholderia.com)

Proposed Reannotation

Protein name

Protein ID

Evidence

BCAL0691, BCAL2945

Putative cytidylyltransferase, D-beta-D-heptose 7-phosphate kinase

Bifunctional protein RfaE domain II and I, respectively, sugar kinase/adenylyltransferase

RfaE

-

Modelling evidence, RfaE is necessary for biosynthesis of ADP-L-glycero-D-manno-heptose, a precursor for LPS inner core biosynthesis; BLAST search of RfaE from P. aeruginosa gave E values of 9E-35 and 1E-75, respectively

BCAL0780

Putative multiphosphoryl transfer protein

Glucose-specific enzyme IIA component of PTS

Crr

TC-4.A.1.1.1

BIOLOG assays indicated growth on glucose; BLAST search of Crr from E.coli gave an E value of 1E-28 and Identities of 40%

BCAL0781

Phosphotransferase system, IIbc component

Glucose/N-acetyl glucosamine-specific IIC component

PtsG/NagE

-

Evidence from BIOLOG assays; BLAST search of PtsG, NagE from E.coli gave E values of 3E-107, 7E-151 and Identities of 43%, 56%, respectively

BCAL0802

Gene locus is not assigned in Burkholderia Genome Database and KEGG

4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase

IspE

EC-2.7.1.148

Modelling evidence, IspE is necessary for biosynthesis of polyprenyl-PP, a precursor for ubiquinone biosynthesis; BLAST E value of 4E-172; assigned gene locus of BCAL0802 (from 872938 to 873820) in GeneDB database

BCAL1281

Hypothetical protein

Ornithine N-acyltransferase

OlsB

EC-2.3.1.-

Physiological evidence from Weissenmayer et al. (2002); OlsB is required for the first step of ornithine-derived lipid biosynthesis; BLAST E value of 1E-29

BCAL1431, BCAL1432, BCAL1433

Putative sugar transport system

Galactose transport

MglB, MglA, MglC

TC-3.A.1.2.3

BIOLOG assays indicated growth on galactose; and BLAST E values (< 2E-23)

BCAL1933, BCAL1934

Putative formyltransferase, NAD-dependent epimerase/dehydratase family protein

UDP-Ara4N formyltransferase, UDP-4'-keto-5'-carboxypentose decarboxylase

ArnA1, ArnA2

-

Evidence from Ortega et al. (2006). Unlike other bacteria in which arnA is a single gene encoding a bifunctional enzyme, two distinct genes were found in J2315 (arnA1 and arnA2) and both are required for Ara4N biosynthesis

BCAL2388

Hypothetical protein

Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase

-

EC-2.7.7.27

Modelling evidence, a missing protein is required for glycogen biosynthesis; and BLAST search against UNIPROT database gave an E value of 9E-58

BCAL3280

Putative carbon-nitrogen hydrolase protein

Succinamic acid amidohydrolase

-

EC-3.5.1.3

BIOLOG assays indicated growth on succinamic acid; modelling showed a missing protein in this pathway; BLAST search against UNIPROT database gave an E value of 3E-46

BCAL3365

Putative gluconate permease

D-gluconate: H+ symporter

GntP

TC-2.A.8.1.3

BIOLOG assays indicated growth on D-Gluconic acid; modelling revealed a lack of transporter; BLAST E values of 4E-68

BCAM0469

Putative aldehyde dehydrogenase

Aldehyde dehydrogenase A, NAD-linked

AldA

EC-1.2.1.21

Modelling evidence: a gene is missing to synthesize glycolaldehyde which is required for biosynthesis of vitamin B6; BLAST E value of 2E-74

BCAM1404

Probable exported glycosyl hydrolase

Sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase

ScrB

EC-3.2.1.26

BIOLOG assays indicated growth on sucrose; modelling showed missing protein along the pathway; gene locus identified from annotation as 93% similarity from Staphylococcus aureus and E value of 1E-33

BCAM2340, BCAM2338, BCAM2336

Putative (R)-3-hydroxydecanoyl-ACP: CoA transacylase, putative glycosyltransferase, putative sugar transferase

Rhamnosyltransferase chain A, Rhamnosyltransferase chain B, Rhamnosyltransferase 2

RhlA, RhlB, RhlC

-

Strong physiological evidence from Dubeau et. al. (2009): Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) can synthesize rhamnolipids; high homologous similarity of RhlA, RhlB, RhlC found in B. cenocepacia J2315 when compared with P. aeruginosa PAO1 and B. thailandensis

BCAM2496, BCAM2497, BCAM2498

Binding-protein-dependent transport system protein, ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, extracellular solute-binding protein

Thiamin transport via ATP-binding protein

ThiP, ThiQ, ThiB

TC-3.A.1.19.1

Genetic evidence: J2315 is unable to biosynthesize thiamin, which is an important cofactor to grow, by itself and could only obtain it from culture medium; BLAST search of ThiP, ThiQ, ThiB from E.coli got good result

BCAM2723

Putative outer membrane porin protein

Pyroglutatmate porin OpdO

OpdO

TC-1.B.25.1.7

Evidence from BIOLOG assays; BLAST search of OpdO from P. aeruginosa PAO1 versus the B. cenocepacia J2315 genome gave an E value of 4E-32

BCAM2795

Hypothetical protein

1,4-lactonase

-

EC-3.1.1.25

BIOLOG assays indicated growth on galactose; modelling suggested a protein is missing in this pathway; BLAST search of 1,4-lactonase from Xanthomonas campestris gave an E value of 4E-55 and identities of 42%

The first type of refinement was to re-annotate genes in i KF1028 - based on literature evidence and BLAST searches - that have been improperly annotated. An example is the gene BCAL1281, which was annotated in both the Burkholderia Genome Database and KEGG as a "hypothetical protein", but that was now reassigned coding for an "ornithine N-acyltransferase". It was reported that the outer membrane of "B. cepacia" [62] possesses unusual polar lipids, ornithine amide lipids (OL) [63, 64]. In addition, the protein OlsB is required for the first step of OL biosynthesis [65]. By BLAST searches of OlsB against the UNIPROT database, the gene BCAL1281 of B. cenocepacia J2315 was identified with high similarity.

Another type of annotation refinement was based on gap analyses, which pinpointed reactions for which the gene products involved were missing. For instance, we identified a missing reaction that should be catalyzed by IspE and that takes part in the biosynthesis of polyprenyl-PP, a necessary precursor of the ubiquinone biosynthesis. The IspE encoding genes for other strains of B. cenocepacia (AU1054, HI2424, MC0-3) could be identified in the Burkholderia Genome Database and KEGG. By querying GeneDB, we found that the genomic location from 872938 to 873820, named BCAL0802, was not assigned any function in the above two databases. A BLAST search of BCAL0802 against the UNIPROT database revealed a perfect match with IspE from other B. cenocepacia strains. Consequently, BCAL0802 is annotated as a 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase and this missing reaction was supplemented into the model i KF1028. This example exemplifies how the reconstruction process can drive the reconciliation of isolated data from different biological databases.

BIOLOG substrate utilization assays have already been successfully used on the refinement of metabolic reconstructions [24]. It is an efficient approach for gap analysis and refinement of genome annotation. For example, in our study we can highlight the case for the substrate D-galactose, associated in BIOLOG assays with a growth phenotype. From that result we inferred that J2315 should contain a transport mechanism for D-galactose. By homology searches of MglA, MglB, and MglC, which are galactose-binding proteins conveying galactose into the cell, gene BCAL1431 (mglB), BCAL1432 (mglA), and BCAL1433 (mglC) were identified and they had been annotated as a putative sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, a putative ribose ABC transport system, and a putative sugar transport system permease protein respectively. The ordering of mglB, mglA, and mglC is consistent with a) previous studies indicating that the mgl operon contains three genes and the genes are transcribed in the order of mglB, mglA, and mglC [66] and b) mglA and mglC being located downstream of mglB [67]. As a result, the annotations of BCAL1431-1433 were refined to account for the galactose transport. In total, 7 genes were reannotated based on BIOLOG assays.

Gene essentiality analysis

The term 'essential gene' means a gene for which knockout is lethal (i.e. no biomass yield) under certain conditions (e.g. glucose minimal medium) [68]. Identification of essential genes is helpful to understand the basic functions required for survival and it is an efficient way to discover novel targets for new antimicrobial therapies. Here in this study, i KF1028 was used as a framework to predict computationally identified essential genes in B. cenocepacia J2315 on both M9 minimal medium and synthetic CF medium (SCFM). About 19% (192) and 15% (154) of the 1,028 metabolic genes included in i KF1028 were predicted to be essential on M9 and SCFM media, respectively. There are more genes predicted as essentials on M9 than on SCFM, which indicates the influence of the living environment on the bacterium. 147 overlapping predictions were on both media. These essential genes are unequally located on the three chromosomes and most of the essential genes are located on chromosome 1 (Figure 4a). This result agrees with known features of the J2315 genome: chromosome 1 contains a higher proportion of coding sequence (CDS) involved in central metabolism and other house-keeping functions, whereas chromosomes 2 and 3 contain a greater proportion of CDS encoding accessory functions [13].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-0509-5-83/MediaObjects/12918_2010_Article_690_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Gene essentiality analysis. (a) Distribution of essential genes predicted on M9 and SCFM respecively; (b) Overlapping essentail genes among in silico prediction on M9, SCFM, and essential genes with in vivo evidence from two P. aeruginosa strains: P. aeruginosa PAO1 and P. aeruginosa PA14.

To assess the predictive potential of the model, we compared the in silico essential genes predicted on SCFM with experimental essentiality data for P. aeruginosa PAO1 and P. aeruginosa PA14 [69, 70] since there is no experimental gene essentiality data available for B. cenocepacia. As both P. aeruginosa and B. cenocepacia are CF pathogens, and B. cenocepacia was historically classified under the genus Pseudomonas[71], it is possible that partial similarity exists between them. SCFM was chosen due to its similarity to the nutritional composition of sputum from CF patients. The common set of the essential genes from two P. aeruginosa strains was chosen for comparison in order to reduce the effect of strain-dependent variation. Totally, there are 294 in silico essential metabolic and non-metabolic genes of B. cenocepacia J2315 with high similarity to the common set of P. aeruginosa by BLAST searches, of which 91 in vivo essential genes are present in i KF1028. Genes in the in vivo essential set but not in the i KF1028 were assumed to be involved either in non-metabolic functions or in accessory functions of metabolism. A total of 55% (50) of the in silico predicted essential genes agreed with the in vivo essential genes based on gene homology with P. aeruginosa (Figure 4b, refer to Additional file 4 for detailed information about essential genes).

Based on gene essentiality analysis, the genome-scale metabolic model of B. cenocepacia was further refined. For example, BCAL0660 and BCAL3421, which were homologous genes encoding protein AccC according to their annotation, were originally both included in the model with the gene-protein-reaction (GPR) relationship of "BCAL0660 or BCAL3421". Through in silico gene deletion study, BCAL3421 is identified as non-essential, which is inconsistent with the in vivo essential gene results. Such discrepancy was subject to further analysis. AccA, AccB, AccC, and AccD were four subunits of Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (ACC) catalyzing the first step of fatty acid biosynthesis [72]. The gene accB, of which the locus in J2315 is BCAL3420, is frequently adjacent to the gene accC and both genes are cotranscribed and form an operon together [73, 74]. Furthermore, BCAL3420 and BCAL3421 shows greater than 2-fold expression for J2315 under CF conditions versus soil conditions, yet BCAL0660 shows an opposite result [75]. Taken together, BCAL0660 was excluded from model i KF1028. Further studies are necessary to validate the function of BCAL0660.

Identification of essential enzymes and potential drug targets

Essential enzyme/protein refers to a gene product (catalyzing the relevant reactions) for which individual deletion (i.e. imposing the fluxes through these reactions to zero) is lethal under certain conditions. Through FBA using i KF1028,we could obtain a collection of essential enzymes (protein), based on which 45 essential enzymes were identified as potential drug targets and supported by experimental evidences from literatures. There are 39 of them which were also predicted as drug targets for P. aeruginosa PAO1 [76]. All the 39 targets are nonhomologous to human protein sequences and thus could serve as potential candidate antibiotic drug targets for CF patients infected by both B. cenocepacia J2315 and P. aeruginosa PAO1. Among 39 targets, there are 9 targets, namely AccA, AccB, AccC, AccD, MurA, FolP, PhoA, RibE, and RibH, which have approved drugs in the DrugBank database [77].

The other 6 potential targets, namely ArnT, ArnB, ArnC, ArnA1, ArnA2, and Ugd are unique in B. cenocepacia J2315. ArnT, ArnB, ArnC, ArnA1, and ArnA2 are necessary proteins required for the synthesis of Ara4N, which is an additional moiety of LPS specially presented in B. cenocepacia J2315. Ara4N is essential for the viability of B. cenocepacia J2315 and significantly contributes to high resistance to antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [54]. AMPs have been proposed as agents for treating CF infections [78, 79]. It had also been demonstrated that arnC transposon mutant was survival-defective and attenuated in infected rats [48]. The UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (Ugd), which catalyzes the conversion of UDP-glucose to UDP-glucuronic acid and is the initial step in the synthesis of UDP-Ara4N, is also necessary for the viability of B. cenocepacia and its resistance to polymyxin B [80]. These targets are potentially useful for designing strategies against B. cenocepacia J2315. Further studies are necessary to test their applicability. An overview of the 45 proposed targets is given in Table 5.
Table 5

Proposed essential enzymes that can be candidate drug targets for B. cenocepacia J2315

Functional subsystem

EC No.

Protein

Enzyme name

Amino acid metabolism

EC-4.2.3.4

AroB

3-dehydroquinate synthase

 

EC-4.2.3.5

AroC

Chorismate synthase

 

EC-1.1.1.25

AroE

Shikimate dehydrogenase

 

EC-1.3.1.26

DapB

Dihydrodipicolinate reductase

 

EC-2.3.1.117

DapD

Tetrahydrodipicolinate succinylase

 

EC-5.1.1.7

DapF

Diaminopimelate epimerase

 

EC-2.7.2.4

LysC

Aspartate kinase

Lipid synthesis

EC-6.4.1.2

AccA*

Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase subunit-α

 

EC-6.4.1.2

AccB*

Acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxyl carrier protein subunit

 

EC-6.4.1.2

AccC*

Acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxylase subunit

 

EC-6.4.1.2

AccD*

Acetyl-CoA carboxylase subunit-β

 

EC-2.7.8.8

PssA

Phosphatidylserine synthase

Cell wall/LPS synthesis

-

ArnA1#

UDP-Ara4N formyltransferase

 

-

ArnA2#

UDP-4-keto-5-carboxypentose decarboxylase

 

-

ArnB#

UDP-4-ketopentose aminotransferase

 

-

ArnC#

Ara4N Und-P transferase

 

-

ArnT#

Ara4N transferase

 

EC-3.6.1.27

BacA

Undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase

 

EC-2.5.1.55

KdsA

2-dehydro-3-deoxyphosphooctonate aldolase

 

EC-2.7.7.38

KdsB

3-deoxy-manno-octulosonate cytidylyltransferase

 

EC-2.3.1.129

LpxA

UDP-N-acetylglucosamine acyltransferase

 

EC-2.4.1.182

LpxB

Lipid-A-disaccharide synthase

 

EC-3.5.1.-

LpxC

UDP-3-O-[3-hydroxymyristoyl]N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase

 

EC-2.7.1.130

LpxK

Tetraacyldisaccharide 4'-kinase

 

EC-2.5.1.7

MurA*

UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 1-carboxyvinyltransferase

 

EC-1.1.1.158

MurB

UDP-N-acetylmuramate dehydrogenase

 

EC-6.3.2.8

MurC

UDP-N-acetylmuramate--L-alanine ligase

 

EC-6.3.2.9

MurD

UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanyl-D-glutamate synthetase

 

EC-6.3.2.13

MurE

UDP-N-acetylmuramoylalanyl-D-glutamate--2, 6-diaminopimelate ligase

 

EC-2.4.1.227

MurG

Undecaprenyldiphospho-muramoylpentapeptide-β-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase

 

EC-1.1.1.22

Udg#

UDP-glucose dehydrogenase

 

EC-2.4.1.-

WaaF

UDP-glucose:(heptosyl) LPS-α-1,3-glucosyltransferase

 

EC-5.1.3.13

RmlC

dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase

Vitamin and cofactor synthesis

EC-2.7.11.5

AceK

Bifunctional isocitrate dehydrogenase kinase/ phosphatase protein

 

EC-4.1.2.25

FolB

Dihydroneopterin aldolase

 

EC-2.5.1.15

FolP*

Dihydropteroate synthase

 

EC-1.2.1.70

HemA

Glutamyl-tRNA reductase

 

EC-2.1.2.11

PanB

3-methyl-2-oxobutanoate hydroxymethyltransferase

 

EC-6.3.2.1

PanC

Pantoate--β-alanine ligase

 

EC-1.1.1.169

PanE

2-dehydropantoate 2-reductase

 

EC-3.1.3.1

PhoA*

Alkaline phophatase

 

EC-3.5.4.25

RibB

Bifunctional 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate synthase

 

EC-3.5.4.26

RibD

Riboflavin-specific deaminase/reductase

 

EC-2.5.1.9

RibE*

Riboflavin synthase subunit-α

 

EC-2.5.1.9

RibH*

6,7-dimethyl-8-ribityllumazine synase

# Essential enzymes unique for B. cenocepacia J2315 (others are shared between B. cenocepacia J2315 and P. aeruginosa PAO1).

* The proteins have had approved drugs from the DrugBank database.

Conclusions

In this study, we reconstructed the first manually curated genome-scale metabolic network of B. cenocepacia J2315, a Gram-negative pathogen for CF patients. An iterative reconstruction process led to the establishment of the model, termed i KF1028, which captures the important metabolic capabilities and biosynthesis of key metabolic virulence factors. The model i KF1028 shows its predictive potential when compared with BIOLOG assays. Model-driven analyses on gene annotation refinement and identification of gene and enzyme essentiality analyses are helpful to understand the genome and discover promising novel drug targets. Through careful investigation, we proposed 45 enzymes that catalyze reactions predicted to be essential for growth with priority to be considered as drug targets. The model will keep being further validated and improved with experimentally determined biomass composition, large-scale gene deletion experimental data, proteome, and metabolome data, as they become available for B. cenocepacia. The model herein developed provides a valuable tool to explore the metabolic space of B. cenocepacia, to describe its metabolic wiring under a range of conditions, to pinpoint possible targets and to generate testable hypotheses. Taken together, our study underlined the value of the model i KF1028 as a framework to systematically study the metabolic capabilities of B. cenocepacia and its metabolic virulence factors affecting the CF community.

Methods

Reconstruction of the metabolic network

The reconstruction process for B. cenocepacia J2315 is illustrated in Figure 5. The process followed the procedure described previously [81]. The reconstruction was carried out on ToBiN (Toolbox for Biochemical Networks, http://www.lifewizz.com), which was first mentioned in the paper [82]. ToBiN is a modular platform for metabolic modelling and the structural analysis of networks. It consists of a collection of open-source computational tools. Sets of reactions can be uploaded in the platform via a web interface, merged with already existing sets, and the resulting stoichiometric matrix is then processed by the server as a FBA problem. The linear solver that ToBiN used is the Clp (Coin-or linear programming), an open-source linear programming solver written in C++ and is part of the COIN-OR (Computational Infrastructure for Operations Research) project (http://www.coin-or.org). The platform works in a similar way as the COBRA toolbox with the main difference that, by being web-based, it permits users to adopt a more efficient and collaborative workflow.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-0509-5-83/MediaObjects/12918_2010_Article_690_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

The process for genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of B. cenocepacia J2315. The left side indicates resources used for reconstruction, and the right side indicates the reconstruction process. Initial reconstruction started from genome annotation and other biological databases. Gap-filling was a continuous step throughout the reconstruction by probing missing reactions in a pathway which causes in silico growth infeasible, and subsequently closing these gaps by referring to the biological databases, extensive literature mining, and comparison with BIOLOG substrate utilization assays [89, 90]. This improved model was then extended by adding key metabolic virulence factors for B. cenocepacia from the literature. The process of model development and validation against experimental data was iteratively repeated until the genome-scale metabolic model was robust.

An initial draft reconstruction was derived from the annotated genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 available at the Burkholderia Genome Database (http://www.burkholderia.com). To link annotated genes to proteins and proteins to reactions, biological databases such as KEGG, GeneDB, UniProt, BRENDA, Transport Classification Database (TCDB), and TransportDB were used [8388]. Manual curations were performed to establish gene-protein-reaction (GPR) associations, which connect genetic data to reactions in the metabolic network and allow for subsequent exploration of metabolic phenotypes using genetic perturbations.

After the initial reconstruction was generated, gaps in metabolic pathways necessary to produce biomass components and key virulence factors were filled by cautious literature mining, BIOLOG substrates utilization assays, and BLAST searches on homology and protein sequence similarity analyses [89, 90]. The genome annotation was refined as consequence of the gap-filling and model extension process.

Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) was carried out throughout this study to explore the metabolic capabilities of i KF1028 under various environments. In addition to minimal medium, synthetic cystic fibrosis medium (SCFM) representing the physical living environment during CF infection was simulated in silico to investigate the metabolic flux distribution in a CF-like condition.

Biomass composition

The biomass composition in the genome-scale metabolic model of B. cenocepacia J2315 was adapted by selecting the well-studied biomass composition of E. coli as a template [91], since there's no experimental data available about the biomass composition of B. cenocepacia. However, the amount of metabolic precursors to formulate the cellular component was specific to B. cenocepacia according to previous study [20]. Moreover, the relative fatty acid composition of the lipids required for growth was based on data specific to B. cenocepacia[63, 64, 92, 93] and listed in Table 6. Further details are provided in the supplemental material [Additional file 5].
Table 6

Amino lipid composition of B. cenocepacia J2315

Fatty acid

PE

PG

CLPN

OL

Saturated

16:0

+

+

+

ND

Unsaturated

16:1

+

+

+

ND

 

18:1

+

+

+

+

Hydoxy

14:0 3OH

ND

ND

ND

+

 

16:0 3OH

ND

ND

ND

+

Cyclopropane

17:0 CYC

+

+

+

ND

 

19:0 CYC

+

+

+

ND

PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; CLPN, cardiolipin; OL, ornithine amide lipid; ND, not determined; plus symbol (+), fatty acid was detected in a significant amount

Flux balance analysis

Flux balance analysis (FBA) is an algorithm based on linear programming (LP) and on the assumption that the represented metabolic network is in steady-state (i.e. all the intracellular metabolite concentrations are constant). Being a LP problem, FBA also requires the selection of an objective function and of whether the value for that same function should be maximized or minimized. FBA is usually used to compute the optimal growth yield (the maximized objective function) based on the assumption that the evolutionary fitness of the organism depends on growth alone and, consequently, the implicit regulatory mechanism are organized to permit the theoretical maximal growth. If the system of equations (stoichiometric matrix which represents the metabolic network) is feasible, the algorithm generates an optimal flux distribution for that same network, taking into account the imposed thermodynamic constraints (reaction directionality) and limits on substrate uptake rates. The mathematical description is as follows:
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-0509-5-83/MediaObjects/12918_2010_Article_690_Equa_HTML.gif

Where S is a stoichiometric matrix containing i rows representing metabolites and j columns representing reactions, v is a vector of all reaction fluxes, vmin and vmax are imposed lower and upper bounds on flux v j respectively, and c T is a vector of coefficients for each reaction that is to be maximized.

In silico media composition

Two different living environments were simulated in silico for strain J2315: M9 minimal medium [94], which contains PO43-, SO42-, NH4+, H+, Fe2+, K+, Mg2+, Na+, H2O, and thiamine, with glucose or other BIOLOG substrates as sole carbon source; and synthetic CF sputum medium (SCFM) [95] representing the nutrient conditions inside a host-cell during CF infection. Details of the simulated SCFM composition are provided in the supplemental material [Additional file 6].

BIOLOG assay

To validate the model and estimate the metabolic capabilities of strain J2315, BIOLOG assay was performed by using various carbon sources for strain cultivation [16]. The BIOLOG assay was carried out in triplicates using Biolog GN2 MicroPlates (Biolog, Inc.), which can test the ability of a microorganism to oxidize a panel of 95 different carbon sources simultaneously. The procedure for using the MicroPlates was according to the manufacturer's specification. The strain J2315 was obtained from DSMZ GmbH (DSMZ 16553, equivalent to LMG 16656 as which strain J2315 has been deposited in the BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection). The strain was cultured overnight in CASO agar plate. Then the bacteria were swabbed from the plate surface and suspended in GN/GP inoculating fluid (Biolog, Inc.) and 150 μl of the suspension was transferred to each well of the GN2 MicroPlate. The MicroPlates were incubated at 30°C for 48 hours and were read by a microplate reader at 24 and 48 hours and analyzed with the Biolog MicroLog3 4.20 software (Biolog, Inc.). A comparison between the BIOLOG results and in silico predictions is provided in the supplemental material. [Additional file 3]

Gene and enzyme essentiality

FBA can be used to interpret genetic modification, such as gene deletion and enzyme inhibition, and subsequently make comprehensive in silico predictions on gene and enzyme essentiality [96]. To assess the essentiality of a gene, its GPR is checked for a unique relation with the associated reaction(s). If the gene is necessary to the reaction, the reaction flux will be constrained to zero and a solution for the maximal growth yield is searched. The deleted gene is predicated to be essential if, as consequence of that added constraint, the value of the objective function (growth yield) changes to zero. The deletion of every gene accounted in the model was simulated for growth on minimal medium with glucose as sole carbon source, and on SCFM. Similarly, an enzyme is considered essential if, by constraining to zero the flux on every associated reaction that has no alternative means of catalysis, the value for the growth yield changes to zero. The essentiality of every enzyme accounted in the model was analysed for growth on SCFM.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements and Funding

We acknowledge funding from the European Union (Projects PROBACTYS: Grant No. 29104 and MICROME: No. 222886), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No. 2011CBA00802) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, the Project for Young Scientists Fund, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. O9CX115011), and Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Project METAGUT; Grant No. ERA-PTG/SAU/0003/2008).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University
(3)
Systems and Synthetic Biology Group, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research (HZI)
(4)
Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(5)
Lifewizz Lda
(6)
Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University

References

  1. Mahenthiralingam E, Baldwin A, Dowson CG: Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology. J Appl Microbiol. 2008, 104: 1539-1551. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03706.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vanlaere E, Lipuma JJ, Baldwin A, Henry D, De Brandt E, Mahenthiralingam E, Speert D, Dowson C, Vandamme P: Burkholderia latens sp. nov., Burkholderia diffusa sp. nov., Burkholderia arboris sp. nov., Burkholderia seminalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia metallica sp. nov., novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008, 58: 1580-1590. 10.1099/ijs.0.65634-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vanlaere E, Baldwin A, Gevers D, Henry D, De Brandt E, LiPuma JJ, Mahenthiralingam E, Speert DP, Dowson C, Vandamme P: Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009, 59: 102-111. 10.1099/ijs.0.001123-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Parke JL, Gurian-Sherman D: Diversity of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and implications for risk assessment of biological control strains. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001, 39: 225-258. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.225View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mahenthiralingam E, Baldwin A, Vandamme P: Burkholderia cepacia complex infection in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Med Microbiol. 2002, 51: 533-538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB: The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 144-156. 10.1038/nrmicro1085View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mann T, Ben-David D, Zlotkin A, Shachar D, Keller N, Toren A, Nagler A, Smollan G, Barzilai A, Rahav G: An outbreak of Burkholderia cenocepacia bacteremia in immunocompromised oncology patients. Infection. 2010, Google Scholar
  8. Govan JR, Brown PH, Maddison J, Doherty CJ, Nelson JW, Dodd M, Greening AP, Webb AK: Evidence for transmission of Pseudomonas cepacia by social contact in cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 1993, 342: 15-19. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91881-LView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin DW, Mohr CD: Invasion and intracellular survival of Burkholderia cepacia. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 24-29. 10.1128/IAI.68.1.24-29.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vandamme P, Holmes B, Coenye T, Goris J, Mahenthiralingam E, LiPuma JJ, Govan JR: Burkholderia cenocepacia sp. nov.--a new twist to an old story. Res Microbiol. 2003, 154: 91-96. 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00026-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Drevinek P, Holden MT, Ge Z, Jones AM, Ketchell I, Gill RT, Mahenthiralingam E: Gene expression changes linked to antimicrobial resistance, oxidative stress, iron depletion and retained motility are observed when Burkholderia cenocepacia grows in cystic fibrosis sputum. BMC Infect Dis. 2008, 8: 121- 10.1186/1471-2334-8-121PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubarry N, Du W, Lane D, Pasta F: Improved electrotransformation and decreased antibiotic resistance of the cystic fibrosis pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia strain J2315. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76: 1095-1102. 10.1128/AEM.02123-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Holden MT, Seth-Smith HM, Crossman LC, Sebaihia M, Bentley SD, Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Thomson NR, Bason N, Quail MA, Sharp S, et al.: The genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315, an epidemic pathogen of cystic fibrosis patients. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 261-277. 10.1128/JB.01230-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Turner J, Cho Y, Dinh NN, Waring AJ, Lehrer RI: Activities of LL-37, a cathelin-associated antimicrobial peptide of human neutrophils. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42: 2206-2214.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Loutet SA, Flannagan RS, Kooi C, Sokol PA, Valvano MA: A complete lipopolysaccharide inner core oligosaccharide is required for resistance of Burkholderia cenocepacia to antimicrobial peptides and bacterial survival in vivo. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 2073-2080. 10.1128/JB.188.6.2073-2080.2006PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller JM, Rhoden DL: Preliminary evaluation of Biolog, a carbon source utilization method for bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1991, 29: 1143-1147.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed JL, Vo TD, Schilling CH, Palsson BO: An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR). Genome Biology. 2003, 4: R45- 10.1186/gb-2003-4-7-r45View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee DS, Burd H, Liu J, Almaas E, Wiest O, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN, Kapatral V: Comparative genome-scale metabolic reconstruction and flux balance analysis of multiple Staphylococcus aureus genomes identify novel antimicrobial drug targets. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 4015-4024. 10.1128/JB.01743-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Becker SA, Palsson BO: Genome-scale reconstruction of the metabolic network in Staphylococcus aureus N315: an initial draft to the two-dimensional annotation. BMC Microbiol. 2005, 5: 8- 10.1186/1471-2180-5-8PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Heinemann M, Kummel A, Ruinatscha R, Panke S: In silico genome-scale reconstruction and validation of the Staphylococcus aureus metabolic network. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005, 92: 850-864. 10.1002/bit.20663View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim HU, Kim TY, Lee SY: Genome-scale metabolic network analysis and drug targeting of multi-drug resistant pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii AYE. Mol Biosyst. 2010, 6: 339-348. 10.1039/b916446dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jamshidi N, Palsson BO: Investigating the metabolic capabilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv using the in silico strain iNJ661 and proposing alternative drug targets. BMC Syst Biol. 2007, 1: 26- 10.1186/1752-0509-1-26PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Raghunathan A, Reed J, Shin S, Palsson B, Daefler S: Constraint-based analysis of metabolic capacity of Salmonella typhimurium during host-pathogen interaction. BMC Syst Biol. 2009, 3: 38- 10.1186/1752-0509-3-38PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Oberhardt MA, Puchalka J, Fryer KE, Martins dos Santos VA, Papin JA: Genome-scale metabolic network analysis of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 2790-2803. 10.1128/JB.01583-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Eberl L: Quorum sensing in the genus Burkholderia. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006, 296: 103-110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Eberl L: From a local dialect to a common language. Chem Biol. 2006, 13: 803-804. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.07.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sokol PA, Malott RJ, Riedel K, Eberl L: Communication systems in the genus Burkholderia: global regulators and targets for novel antipathogenic drugs. Future Microbiol. 2007, 2: 555-563. 10.2217/17460913.2.5.555View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Boon C, Deng Y, Wang LH, He Y, Xu JL, Fan Y, Pan SQ, Zhang LH: A novel DSF-like signal from Burkholderia cenocepacia interferes with Candida albicans morphological transition. ISME J. 2008, 2: 27-36. 10.1038/ismej.2007.76View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Deng Y, Boon C, Eberl L, Zhang LH: Differential modulation of Burkholderia cenocepacia virulence and energy metabolism by the quorum-sensing signal BDSF and its synthase. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 7270-7278. 10.1128/JB.00681-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryan RP, McCarthy Y, Watt SA, Niehaus K, Dow JM: Intraspecies signaling involving the diffusible signal factor BDSF (cis-2-dodecenoic acid) influences virulence in Burkholderia cenocepacia. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 5013-5019. 10.1128/JB.00473-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sokol PA, Darling P, Woods DE, Mahenthiralingam E, Kooi C: Role of ornibactin biosynthesis in the virulence of Burkholderia cepacia: characterization of pvdA, the gene encoding L-ornithine N(5)-oxygenase. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 4443-4455.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Farmer KL, Thomas MS: Isolation and characterization of Burkholderia cenocepacia mutants deficient in pyochelin production: pyochelin biosynthesis is sensitive to sulfur availability. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 270-277. 10.1128/JB.186.2.270-277.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Visser MB, Majumdar S, Hani E, Sokol PA: Importance of the ornibactin and pyochelin siderophore transport systems in Burkholderia cenocepacia lung infections. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 2850-2857. 10.1128/IAI.72.5.2850-2857.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sajjan US, Sun L, Goldstein R, Forstner JF: Cable (cbl) type II pili of cystic fibrosis-associated Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia: nucleotide sequence of the cblA major subunit pilin gene and novel morphology of the assembled appendage fibers. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 1030-1038.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sajjan U, Ackerley C, Forstner J: Interaction of cblA/adhesin-positive Burkholderia cepacia with squamous epithelium. Cell Microbiol. 2002, 4: 73-86. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00171.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sajjan U, Liu L, Lu A, Spilker T, Forstner J, LiPuma JJ: Lack of cable pili expression by cblA-containing Burkholderia cepacia complex. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 3477-3484.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tomich M, Herfst CA, Golden JW, Mohr CD: Role of flagella in host cell invasion by Burkholderia cepacia. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 1799-1806. 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1799-1806.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Urban TA, Griffith A, Torok AM, Smolkin ME, Burns JL, Goldberg JB: Contribution of Burkholderia cenocepacia flagella to infectivity and inflammation. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 5126-5134. 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5126-5134.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hutchison ML, Poxton IR, Govan JR: Burkholderia cepacia produces a hemolysin that is capable of inducing apoptosis and degranulation of mammalian phagocytes. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 2033-2039.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kooi C, Corbett CR, Sokol PA: Functional analysis of the Burkholderia cenocepacia ZmpA metalloprotease. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 4421-4429. 10.1128/JB.187.13.4421-4429.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kooi C, Subsin B, Chen R, Pohorelic B, Sokol PA: Burkholderia cenocepacia ZmpB is a broad-specificity zinc metalloprotease involved in virulence. Infect Immun. 2006, 74: 4083-4093. 10.1128/IAI.00297-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kooi C, Sokol PA: Burkholderia cenocepacia zinc metalloproteases influence resistance to antimicrobial peptides. Microbiology. 2009, 155: 2818-2825. 10.1099/mic.0.028969-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Korbsrisate S, Tomaras AP, Damnin S, Ckumdee J, Srinon V, Lengwehasatit I, Vasil ML, Suparak S: Characterization of two distinct phospholipase C enzymes from Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 1907-1915. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003004-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomich M, Griffith A, Herfst CA, Burns JL, Mohr CD: Attenuated virulence of a Burkholderia cepacia type III secretion mutant in a murine model of infection. Infect Immun. 2003, 71: 1405-1415. 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1405-1415.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Engledow AS, Medrano EG, Mahenthiralingam E, LiPuma JJ, Gonzalez CF: Involvement of a plasmid-encoded type IV secretion system in the plant tissue watersoaking phenotype of Burkholderia cenocepacia. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 6015-6024. 10.1128/JB.186.18.6015-6024.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Markey KM, Glendinning KJ, Morgan JA, Hart CA, Winstanley C: Caenorhabditis elegans killing assay as an infection model to study the role of type III secretion in Burkholderia cenocepacia. J Med Microbiol. 2006, 55: 967-969. 10.1099/jmm.0.46618-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ortega X, Hunt TA, Loutet S, Vinion-Dubiel AD, Datta A, Choudhury B, Goldberg JB, Carlson R, Valvano MA: Reconstitution of O-specific lipopolysaccharide expression in Burkholderia cenocepacia strain J2315, which is associated with transmissible infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 1324-1333. 10.1128/JB.187.4.1324-1333.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hunt TA, Kooi C, Sokol PA, Valvano MA: Identification of Burkholderia cenocepacia genes required for bacterial survival in vivo. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 4010-4022. 10.1128/IAI.72.7.4010-4022.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. De Soyza A, Silipo A, Lanzetta R, Govan JR, Molinaro A: Chemical and biological features of Burkholderia cepacia complex lipopolysaccharides. Innate Immun. 2008, 14: 127-144. 10.1177/1753425908093984View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Parsons YN, Banasko R, Detsika MG, Duangsonk K, Rainbow L, Hart CA, Winstanley C: Suppression-subtractive hybridisation reveals variations in gene distribution amongst the Burkholderia cepacia complex, including the presence in some strains of a genomic island containing putative polysaccharide production genes. Arch Microbiol. 2003, 179: 214-223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Silipo A, Molinaro A, Ierano T, De Soyza A, Sturiale L, Garozzo D, Aldridge C, Corris PA, Khan CM, Lanzetta R, Parrilli M: The complete structure and pro-inflammatory activity of the lipooligosaccharide of the highly epidemic and virulent gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia ET-12 (strain J2315). Chemistry. 2007, 13: 3501-3511. 10.1002/chem.200601406View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ortega X, Silipo A, Saldias MS, Bates CC, Molinaro A, Valvano MA: Biosynthesis and structure of the Burkholderia cenocepacia K56-2 lipopolysaccharide core oligosaccharide: truncation of the core oligosaccharide leads to increased binding and sensitivity to polymyxin B. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 21738-21751. 10.1074/jbc.M109.008532PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Vinion-Dubiel AD, Goldberg JB: Lipopolysaccharide of Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Endotoxin Res. 2003, 9: 201-213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ortega XP, Cardona ST, Brown AR, Loutet SA, Flannagan RS, Campopiano DJ, Govan JR, Valvano MA: A putative gene cluster for aminoarabinose biosynthesis is essential for Burkholderia cenocepacia viability. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 3639-3644. 10.1128/JB.00153-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Chung HS, Raetz CRH: Identification and characterization of a 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) oxidase; KdoO. The FASEB Journal. 2010Google Scholar
  56. Kenna DT, Barcus VA, Langley RJ, Vandamme P, Govan JR: Lack of correlation between O-serotype, bacteriophage susceptibility and genomovar status in the Burkholderia cepacia complex. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003, 35: 87-92. 10.1016/S0928-8244(02)00442-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Malott RJ, Baldwin A, Mahenthiralingam E, Sokol PA: Characterization of the cciIR quorum-sensing system in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 4982-4992. 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4982-4992.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams P, Winzer K, Chan WC, Camara M: Look who's talking: communication and quorum sensing in the bacterial world. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007, 362: 1119-1134. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2039PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Baldwin A, Sokol PA, Parkhill J, Mahenthiralingam E: The Burkholderia cepacia epidemic strain marker is part of a novel genomic island encoding both virulence and metabolism-associated genes in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 1537-1547. 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1537-1547.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Diggle SP, Matthijs S, Wright VJ, Fletcher MP, Chhabra SR, Lamont IL, Kong X, Hider RC, Cornelis P, Camara M, Williams P: The Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-quinolone signal molecules HHQ and PQS play multifunctional roles in quorum sensing and iron entrapment. Chem Biol. 2007, 14: 87-96. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.11.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Dubeau D, Deziel E, Woods DE, Lepine F: Burkholderia thailandensis harbors two identical rhl gene clusters responsible for the biosynthesis of rhamnolipids. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9: 263- 10.1186/1471-2180-9-263PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Coenye T, Vandamme P, Govan JR, LiPuma JJ: Taxonomy and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 3427-3436. 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3427-3436.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilkinson S, Pitt T: Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia: Surface chemistry and typing methods. REV MED MICROBIOL. 1995, 6: 1-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Taylor CJ, Anderson AJ, Wilkinson SG: Phenotypic variation of lipid composition in Burkholderia cepacia: a response to increased growth temperature is a greater content of 2-hydroxy acids in phosphatidylethanolamine and ornithine amide lipid. Microbiology. 1998, 144 (Pt 7): 1737-1745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Gao JL, Weissenmayer B, Taylor AM, Thomas-Oates J, Lopez-Lara IM, Geiger O: Identification of a gene required for the formation of lyso-ornithine lipid, an intermediate in the biosynthesis of ornithine-containing lipids. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 53: 1757-1770. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04240.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Harayama S, Bollinger J, Iino T, Hazelbauer GL: Characterization of the mgl operon of Escherichia coli by transposon mutagenesis and molecular cloning. J Bacteriol. 1983, 153: 408-415.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Stamm LV, Young NR, Frye JG, Hardham JM: Identification and sequences of the Treponema pallidum mglA and mglC genes. DNA Seq. 1996, 6: 293-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Koonin EV: Comparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestor. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003, 1: 127-136. 10.1038/nrmicro751View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Jacobs MA, Alwood A, Thaipisuttikul I, Spencer D, Haugen E, Ernst S, Will O, Kaul R, Raymond C, Levy R, et al.: Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 14339-14344. 10.1073/pnas.2036282100PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Liberati NT, Urbach JM, Miyata S, Lee DG, Drenkard E, Wu G, Villanueva J, Wei T, Ausubel FM: An ordered, nonredundant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 transposon insertion mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 2833-2838. 10.1073/pnas.0511100103PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Oyaizu H, Yano I, Hotta H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, Arakawa M: Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol. 1992, 36: 1251-1275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Cronan JE, Waldrop GL: Multi-subunit acetyl-CoA carboxylases. Prog Lipid Res. 2002, 41: 407-435. 10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00007-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Li SJ, Cronan JE: Growth rate regulation of Escherichia coli acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase, which catalyzes the first committed step of lipid biosynthesis. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 332-340.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Abdel-Hamid AM, Cronan JE: Coordinate expression of the acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase genes, accB and accC, is necessary for normal regulation of biotin synthesis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 369-376. 10.1128/JB.01373-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Yoder-Himes DR, Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM: Identification of potential therapeutic targets for Burkholderia cenocepacia by comparative transcriptomics. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e8724- 10.1371/journal.pone.0008724PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Perumal D, Samal A, Sakharkar KR, Sakharkar MK: Targeting multiple targets in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 using flux balance analysis of a reconstructed genome-scale metabolic network. J Drug Target. 2010, Google Scholar
  77. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Cheng D, Shrivastava S, Tzur D, Gautam B, Hassanali M: DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D901-906.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang L, Parente J, Harris SM, Woods DE, Hancock RE, Falla TJ: Antimicrobial peptide therapeutics for cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 2921-2927. 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2921-2927.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Mookherjee N, Hancock RE: Cationic host defence peptides: innate immune regulatory peptides as a novel approach for treating infections. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007, 64: 922-933. 10.1007/s00018-007-6475-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Loutet SA, Bartholdson SJ, Govan JR, Campopiano DJ, Valvano MA: Contributions of two UDP-glucose dehydrogenases to viability and polymyxin B resistance of Burkholderia cenocepacia. Microbiology. 2009, 155: 2029-2039. 10.1099/mic.0.027607-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Edwards JS, Covert M, Palsson BO: Metabolic modelling of microbes:the flux-balance approach. Environmental Microbiology. 2002, 4: 133-140. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00282.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Diez MS, Lam CM, Leprince A, dos Santos VA: (Re-)construction, characterization and modeling of systems for synthetic biology. Biotechnol J. 2009, 4: 1382-1391. 10.1002/biot.200900173View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Hertz-Fowler C, Peacock CS, Wood V, Aslett M, Kerhornou A, Mooney P, Tivey A, Berriman M, Hall N, Rutherford K, et al.: GeneDB: a resource for prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: D339-343. 10.1093/nar/gkh007PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Schomburg I, Chang A, Ebeling C, Gremse M, Heldt C, Huhn G, Schomburg D: BRENDA, the enzyme database: updates and major new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: D431-433. 10.1093/nar/gkh081PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S, Katayama T, Araki M, Hirakawa M: From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D354-357. 10.1093/nar/gkj102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Ren Q, Chen K, Paulsen IT: TransportDB: a comprehensive database resource for cytoplasmic membrane transport systems and outer membrane channels. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: D274-279. 10.1093/nar/gkl925PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D190-195.
  88. Saier MH, Tran CV, Barabote RD: TCDB: the Transporter Classification Database for membrane transport protein analyses and information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D181-186. 10.1093/nar/gkj001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Orth JD, Palsson BO: Systematizing the generation of missing metabolic knowledge. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010, 107: 403-412. 10.1002/bit.22844PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Reed JL, Patel TR, Chen KH, Joyce AR, Applebee MK, Herring CD, Bui OT, Knight EM, Fong SS, Palsson BO: Systems approach to refining genome annotation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 17480-17484. 10.1073/pnas.0603364103PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Feist AM, Henry CS, Reed JL, Krummenacker M, Joyce AR, Karp PD, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V, Palsson BØ: A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Molecular Systems Biology. 2007, 3:Google Scholar
  92. Krejci E, Kroppenstedt RM: Defferentiation of Species Combined into the Burkholderia cepacia Complex and Related Taxa on the Basis of Their Fatty Acid Patterns. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2006, 44:Google Scholar
  93. Sousa SA, Ramos CG, Almeida F, Meirinhos-Soares L, Wopperer J, Schwager S, Eberl L, Leitao JH: Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 acyl carrier protein: a potential target for antimicrobials' development?. Microb Pathog. 2008, 45: 331-336. 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.08.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Miller JH: Experiments in molecular genetics. 1972, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  95. Palmer KL, Aye LM, Whiteley M: Nutritional cues control Pseudomonas aeruginosa multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 8079-8087. 10.1128/JB.01138-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Joyce AR, Reed JL, White A, Edwards R, Osterman A, Baba T, Mori H, Lesely SA, Palsson BO, Agarwalla S: Experimental and computational assessment of conditionally essential genes in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 8259-8271. 10.1128/JB.00740-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.