Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of knockout predictions.

From: Phenotype prediction in regulated metabolic networks

 

glc

gl

suc

ac

rib

glc (-O2)

Dual Substr.

Reference

aceA

+/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+

-/-/-/-

 

+/+/+/+

 

[30]

aceB

   

-/-/-/-

   

[31]

aceEF

-/+/-/-

 

-/+/-/-

+/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+ (glc-ac)

[32]

ackA

   

+/+/+/-

   

[33]

ackA + pta + acs

   

-/-/-/-

   

[33]

acnA

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+

 

[31,34]

acnB

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

-/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+

 

[34]

acnA + acnB

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

 

-/-/-/-

 

[34]

acs

   

+/+/+/+

   

[33]

adh

+/+/+/+

    

-/+/+/+

 

[35]

cyd

+/+/+/+

      

[36]

cyo

+/+/+/+

      

[36]

eno

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

   

+/+/+/+ (gl-suc)

[37]

fbaA

-/+/+/+

      

[38]

fbp

+/+/+/+

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

   

[39]

frdA

+/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+

 

[30]

fumA

   

-/+/-/-

 

+/+/+/+

 

[31]

gap

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

   

+/+/+/+ (gl-suc)

[37]

glk

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

glk + pfkA

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

glk + pts

-/-/-/-

      

[38]

gltA

-/-/-/-

  

-/-/-/-

   

[34]

gnd

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

icd

-/-/-/-

  

-/-/-/-

   

[34]

mdh

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

  

+/+/+/+

 

[40]

ndh

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

     

[41]

nuo

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+

     

[41]

pfl

     

+/+/+/+

 

[42]

pgi

+/+/+/+

+/-/-/-

+/-/-/-

    

[38]

pgi + gnd

-/-/-/-

      

[38]

pgi + zwf

-/-/-/-

      

[38]

pgk

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

   

+/+/+/+ (gl-suc)

[37]

pgl

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

ppc

-/+/-/-

-/+/-/+

+/+/+/+

   

+/+/+/+ (gl-suc) +/+/+/+ (glc-suc)

[38,40]

pta

   

+/+/+/-

   

[33]

pts

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

pykA

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

pykA + pykF

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

pykF

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

rpiA

-/+/-/+

   

+/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+ (glc-rib)

[43]

rpiA + rpiB

-/-/-/+

   

-/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+ (glc-rib)

[43]

rpiB

+/+/+/+

   

+/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+ (glc-rib)

[43]

rpiR + rpiA

+/N/+/+

   

+/N/+/+

 

+/N/+/+ (glc-rib)

[43]

sdhABCD

+/+/+/+

 

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

 

+/+/+/+

 

[30]

sucAB- lpd

-/+/+/+

 

-/+/+/+

-/+/+/+

 

+/+/+/+

+/+/+/+ (glc-suc)

[30,32]

tpi

-/+/+/+

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

-/-/-/-

  

+/+/+/+ (glc-suc) +/+/+/+ (glc-gl)

[37,44]

zwf

+/+/+/+

      

[38]

  1. Comparing in vivo knockout experiment results with predictions made by FBA, rFBA, OT and by aOT. A '+' indicates growth, a '-' no growth of the mutants on the indicated substrate(s). For cases denoted as 'N', data was not available. Results and predictions are derived from in vivo/FBA/rFBA/(a)OT. In vivo data and references, FBA and rFBA predictions are taken from Ref. [19]. In five instances, predictions made by OT deviate from rFBA predictions (bold cases). See text for discussion. The growth medium contained glucose (glc), glycerol (gl), succinate (suc), acetate (ac), or ribose (rib). Anaerobic condition is denoted by '-O2'.