Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain i JN746 and KT2442.

From: A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Pseudomonas putida KT2440: i JN746 as a cell factory

Strain Carbon
source
μmax(h-1)
iJN746
μmax(h-1)
KT2442
Carbon Uptake rate
(mmol gDW/h)
O2 Uptake rate
(mmol gDW/h)
i JN746/KT2442 Glucose 0.751 0.56a 6.3a 15.34d
i JN746/KT2442 Toluene 0.421 0.72b 11.9b 18.5c
i JN746/KT2442 Toluene 0.476 0.72 11.9 20.93d
i JN746/KT2442 Toluene 0.7255 0.72 11.9 33
i JN746/KT2442 Toluene 1.262 0.72 11.9
  1. Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain i JN746 and KT2442. The in silico growth rate was calculated in i M9 minimal medium plus glucose or toluene. Due to candidate oxygen limited growth in toluene, the in silico growth rate was calculated under different oxygen uptake rates In addition i JN746 growth in toluene as only carbon source was simulated at different oxygen uptake rates. a from [25]; b from[26]; c from [78], and d experimentally determined in this study.