Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain i JN746 and KT2442.

From: A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Pseudomonas putida KT2440: i JN746 as a cell factory

Strain

Carbon

source

μmax(h-1)

iJN746

μmax(h-1)

KT2442

Carbon Uptake rate

(mmol gDW/h)

O2 Uptake rate

(mmol gDW/h)

i JN746/KT2442

Glucose

0.751

0.56a

6.3a

15.34d

i JN746/KT2442

Toluene

0.421

0.72b

11.9b

18.5c

i JN746/KT2442

Toluene

0.476

0.72

11.9

20.93d

i JN746/KT2442

Toluene

0.7255

0.72

11.9

33

i JN746/KT2442

Toluene

1.262

0.72

11.9

∞

  1. Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain i JN746 and KT2442. The in silico growth rate was calculated in i M9 minimal medium plus glucose or toluene. Due to candidate oxygen limited growth in toluene, the in silico growth rate was calculated under different oxygen uptake rates In addition i JN746 growth in toluene as only carbon source was simulated at different oxygen uptake rates. a from [25]; b from[26]; c from [78], and d experimentally determined in this study.