Xml-incapsulation routine benchmarks
|
---|
Name
|
BWB
|
XML (compression %)
|
Allocated memory
|
---|
CC(1)
|
55.619
|
7.974 (85.66%)
|
398.248
|
UAT(1)
|
68.276
|
20.486 (70.00%)
|
403.136
|
CC(2)
|
102.870
|
19.875 (80.68%)
|
503.344
|
UAT(2)
|
106.271
|
21.100 (80.15%)
|
480.448
|
MAPKc
|
577.962
|
50.618 (91.24%)
|
1.721.616
|
Bycc(1)
|
909.064
|
172.266 (81.05%)
|
2.038.944
|
Gpc-RS
|
8.293.036
|
190.131 (97.71%)
|
21.790.768
|
Bycc(2)
|
130.821.452
|
3.735.872 (97.14%)
|
241.635.920
|
Bycc(3)
|
136.219.582
|
3.913.680 (97.13%)
|
191.823.072
|
Bycc(4)
|
148.322.373
|
4.318.744 (97.09%)
|
192.881.840
|
- Data set names have been shortened in: CC (Circadian Clock) [59], UAT (Unpacked antagonistic toggle switch in budding yeast cell cycle) [62], MAPKc (MAPK cascade), Gpc-RS (G-protein-coupled receptor signaling) [63] and Bycc (Budding yeast cell cycle) [64]. Measurements are expressed in KByte. We list the names of the models in the first column. The second one identifies the traces files size generated by BWB. The third one holds the sizes of the corresponding compressed XML files (in percentage). The last one lists the quantity of memory allocated (in KBytes) for the compression and conversion routines from BWB to XML formats.