Skip to main content

Table 2 Base classifiers comparison based on different feature-sets

From: Features analysis for identification of date and party hubs in protein interaction network of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Feature Average CCR (Corr. Coef.) %
  KNN Bayes with
Gaussian PDF
Bayes with
MDM PDF
Amino Acid compositions 26.0 (11.5) 25.0 (50.0) 33.6 (15.0)
Dipeptides 31.7 (21.8) 31.5 (25.1) 43.9 (36.8)
PairsComp1Gap 31.5 (23.7) 31.6 (27.2) 43.0 (29.4)
PairsComp2Gaps 30.7 (21.0) 31.8 (25.7) 45.9 (34.4)
Haralick Features 26.9 (03.5) 26.6 (06.1) 26.0 (07.8)
48 physicochemical prop. 26.6 (10.3) 25.0 (50.0) 29.4 (13.5)
Biological Process level 1 31.8 (16.8) 27.8 (16.4) 34.3 (18.8)
Biological Process level 2 33.0 (22.2) 33.5 (18.0) 30.9 (14.1)
Cellular level 1 32.7 (25.8) 27.0 (19.0) 35.4 (29.5)
Cellular level 2 31.4 (28.5) 31.0 (20.2) 28.2 (14.5)
Functional Process level 1 30.0 (10.9) 27.3 (08.4) 27.6 (11.6)
Functional Process level 2 28.2 (15.8) 30.5 (17.9) 28.3 (15.7)
Domains 56.0 (60.0) 67.1 (58.9) 63.7 (55.5)
Repeated Domains 57.0 (59.3) 66.6 (57.7) 65.7 (57.1)
Disordered Regions 26.5 (07.5) 25.2 (-4.0) 27.2 (13.3)
PSSM-20 26.2 (08.4) 26.0 (08.4) 26.0 (09.3)
PSSM-400 37.0 (35.8) 42.6 (42.1) 54.1 (47.9)