Skip to main content

Table 2 Base classifiers comparison based on different feature-sets

From: Features analysis for identification of date and party hubs in protein interaction network of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Feature

Average CCR (Corr. Coef.) %

 

KNN

Bayes with

Gaussian PDF

Bayes with

MDM PDF

Amino Acid compositions

26.0 (11.5)

25.0 (50.0)

33.6 (15.0)

Dipeptides

31.7 (21.8)

31.5 (25.1)

43.9 (36.8)

PairsComp1Gap

31.5 (23.7)

31.6 (27.2)

43.0 (29.4)

PairsComp2Gaps

30.7 (21.0)

31.8 (25.7)

45.9 (34.4)

Haralick Features

26.9 (03.5)

26.6 (06.1)

26.0 (07.8)

48 physicochemical prop.

26.6 (10.3)

25.0 (50.0)

29.4 (13.5)

Biological Process level 1

31.8 (16.8)

27.8 (16.4)

34.3 (18.8)

Biological Process level 2

33.0 (22.2)

33.5 (18.0)

30.9 (14.1)

Cellular level 1

32.7 (25.8)

27.0 (19.0)

35.4 (29.5)

Cellular level 2

31.4 (28.5)

31.0 (20.2)

28.2 (14.5)

Functional Process level 1

30.0 (10.9)

27.3 (08.4)

27.6 (11.6)

Functional Process level 2

28.2 (15.8)

30.5 (17.9)

28.3 (15.7)

Domains

56.0 (60.0)

67.1 (58.9)

63.7 (55.5)

Repeated Domains

57.0 (59.3)

66.6 (57.7)

65.7 (57.1)

Disordered Regions

26.5 (07.5)

25.2 (-4.0)

27.2 (13.3)

PSSM-20

26.2 (08.4)

26.0 (08.4)

26.0 (09.3)

PSSM-400

37.0 (35.8)

42.6 (42.1)

54.1 (47.9)