Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of 4-node biological network motifs in the Y2k network

From: Biological network motif detection and evaluation

Algorithm

Motif included in

GO Clustering score

 

Complex

function

BP

MF

CC

ESU

.501

.152

.61

.21

.67

RAND-ESU

.491

.126

.61

.23

.65

MFINDER

.586

.180

.65

.26

.72

EDGE GO-BNM

.603

.463

.94

.25

.90

EDGE BETWEENNESS-BNM

.904

.178

.82

.19

.84

NMFGO-BNM

.609

.434

.92

.27

.90

NMF-BNM

.819

.177

.76

.26

.80

VOLTAGE-BNM

.638

.200

.63

.26

.77

  1. EDGE BETWEENNESS-BNM performs best in 'motif included in complex' measure. NMFBO-bnm performs best on 'MF' and 'CC clustering score' measures. EDGE GO-BNM performs best in the 'motif included in functional module measure 'BP, CC clustering score' measures. However all the algorithms perform poorly in 'MF clustering score' measure, with less than 30.
Back to article page

BMC Systems Biology

ISSN: 1752-0509

Contact us