Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison between FAME and existing software

From: FAME, the Flux Analysis and Modeling Environment

Tool name

Ref.

Visualization

Run

Oper. mode

Model handling

  

Supervised

Unsupervised

User-supplied

FBA

FVA

MOMA

Gene/rxn

Stand-alone

Web-based

Build

Edit

Import SBML

Export SBML

FAME

 

 

 

 

Model SEED

[2]

  

  

1

 

2

 

COBRA Toolbox

[3]

  

  

3

3

OptFlux

[4]

  

   

CellNetAnalyzer

[5]

  

      

PySCeS

[7]

   

  

4

  

YANASquare

[13]

 

   

 

 

MEGU

[14]

       

    

BioMet Toolbox

[15]

   

  

4

    

Cytoscape

[16]

 

   

1

 

  
  1. Notes:
  2. 1. Gene/reaction associations are used to build models, but no analyses are performed on them.
  3. 2. Model SEED has only limited editing capabilities once a model has been produced.
  4. 3. The COBRA Toolbox uses an SBML dialect specific to this tool.
  5. 4. Certain dependencies must be installed first.
  6. A comparison of the features offered in FAME and existing alternatives. A indicates a feature that is present; an open circle () denotes a partial implementation of the feature in question. Under visualization, "supervised" means the application uses predefined network topologies, "unsupervised" means networks are drawn on the fly, as graphs, and "user-supplied" means that visualization is performed on user-supplied network topology maps.
  7. Under "Run", MOMA represents Minimization Of Metabolic Adjustments, which is described in [17]. Most packages feature additional analyses besides the ones listed in this table. As many of these tools are custom-built for these analyses, or vice versa, we do not list those analysis options in this table. The tools whose functionalities most resemble FAME's have no web interface or have inferior visualization capabilities. On the other hand, tools featuring (or focusing on) superior visualization lack the powerful analysis features unlocked by PySCeS-CBM.