Skip to main content

Advertisement

Figure 1 | BMC Systems Biology

Figure 1

From: A strategy to study pathway cross-talks of cells under repetitive exposure to stimuli

Figure 1

Summary of theoretical analysis. A) Schematic illustration of the experimental procedure inducing priming effect. B) An abstract three-node model was chosen to represent that the stimulus can activate two parallel pathways (through x1 and x2) which converge to the monitored readout (x3). A set of corresponding ordinary differential equations (ODEs) were constructed, and a Metropolis sampling algorithm was used to search for parameter sets giving the priming effect in the high-dimensional parameter space. C) Computational studies show that the parameter sets leading to priming naturally divide into two regions, corresponding to different priming mechanisms. Δ s s x 1 , L D ( Δ s s x 2 , L D ): change of x1 (x2) level at the end of LD treatment period compared to those of untreated cells. D) The right region in C) can be further discriminated according to the sample abundance distribution (relative to the maximum within each group) of Δ max x 2 , L D + H D - Δ max x 2 , L D (difference between the maximum level of x2 during the HD treatment period after LD pretreatment and that of x2 without LD pretreatment), suggesting overall three priming mechanisms. Panels A and B are adapted from [25].

Back to article page