Table 2 Ranking performance comparison
From: Mining breast cancer genes with a network based noise-tolerant approach
     The proposed method |      Random walk approach | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Gene | Ranking | Gene | Ranking |
RB1 | 89 | RB1 | 60 |
CCND1 | 105 | EP300 | 119 |
EP300 | 142 | CCND1 | 227 |
ERBB2 | 171 | ERBB2 | 326 |
MAP2K4 | 450 | NTRK3 | 685 |
GATA3 | 463 | MAP2K4 | 1167 |
BAP1 | 530 | BAP1 | 1231 |
PBRM1 | 1626 | GATA3 | 3042 |
ETV6 | 2952 | PBRM1 | 3102 |
NTRK3 | 4030 | ETV6 | 3355 |
SLC22A18 | 9254 | SLC22A18 | 10971 |
top 10% average | 279 | Â | 545 |
all 11 test genes average | 1801 | Â | 2207 |