Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of true and reconstructed splits and weights on the artificial tree by 6 methods

From: Quartet-based methods to reconstruct phylogenetic networks

True Phylo

QuartetS

QuartetA

QuartetM

Quartet-Net

Neighbor-Net

Neighbor-Joining

Split

Wei

Split

Wei

BV

Split

Wei

BV

Split

Wei

BV

Split

Wei

BV

Split

Wei

BV

Split

Wei

BV

ab

1

ab

1

100

ab

1

100

ab

1

100

ab

1

100

ab

1

100

ab

1

100

abcd

3

abcd

3.03

100

abcd

3

100

abcd

2.98

100

abcd

3.03

100

abcd

2.98

100

abcd

2.98

100

abef

1

abef

1.03

100

abef

1.03

100

abef

1.03

100

abef

1.03

100

abef

1.02

100

abef

1.02

100

a

1

a

1.03

100

a

0.99

100

a

0.98

100

a

1.03

100

a

1.04

100

a

1.04

100

b

1

b

1.04

100

b

1

100

b

0.99

100

b

1.04

100

b

1.05

100

b

1.05

100

c

1

c

1.03

100

c

0.99

100

c

0.98

100

c

1.03

100

c

1.04

100

c

1.04

100

d

1

d

1.03

100

d

0.99

100

d

0.98

100

d

1.03

100

d

1.04

100

d

1.04

100

e

1

e

1.04

100

e

1.01

100

e

1.00

100

e

1.04

100

e

1.04

100

e

1.05

100

f

1

f

1.06

100

f

1.03

100

f

1.02

100

f

1.06

100

f

1.06

100

f

1.06

100

           

abc

0.01

15

abc

0.02

31

   
           

abd

0.02

15

abd

0.02

40

   
           

acef

0.01

15

acef

0.01

21

   
              

abf

0.02

34

   
              

acd

0.02

33

   
              

aef

0.02

36

   
              

abe

0.02

35

   
              

ad

0.01

16

   
              

ae

0.01

15

   
              

adef

0.01

19

   
  1. The column “True Phylo” denotes the underlying truth and the columns “QuartetS”, “QuartetA”, “QuartetM”, “Quartet-Net”, “Neighbor-Net”, and “Neighbor-Joining” denote the reconstructed results by each method respectively. In addition, “Wei” denotes the average weight of the corresponding split over 100 runs; “BV” denote bootstrap value.