Interactions | MI | PCR | Lit. | Comment | Interactions | MI | PCR | Lit. | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G-CSF | NF-κB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[44] | IL-6 | RSK | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[45] | - IL-6 has the lowest R 2-value. This may be due to avoiding the linearity assumption in computing the mutual information. | |
(Pro-inflammatory) | JNK lg | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[46] | (Anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory) | JNK lg | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[47] | ||
JNK sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[46] | JNK sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[47] | ||||
P38 | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | P38 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[48] | ||||
PKCμ2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[49] | PKCμ2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[50] | ||||
ERK1 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[51] | NF-κB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[52] | ||||
ERK2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[51] | ERK1 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[45] | ||||
RSK | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[53] | ERK2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[45] | ||||
Finding: Our model confirms the regulatory effect of P38, which has been suggested by the PCR minimal model [34]. | cAMP | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[54] | |||||||
TNFα | RSK | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | - TNFα has the largest network. This study identifies the regulatory effect of 12 phosphoproteins on TNFα. | IL-10 | JNK lg | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | |
(Pro-inflammatory) | AKT | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[55] | (Anti-inflammatory) | P38 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[56] | ||
P38 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[57] | ||||||||
RPS6 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[58] | ||||||||
GSK3A | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[59] | - TNFα yields the highest coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.62 | |||||||
GSK3B | ✘ | ✘ | ✓[59] | ||||||||
PKCμ2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[60] | ERK1 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[61] | ||||
cAMP | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[62] | ERK2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[61] | ||||
NF-κB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[58] | JNK sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ||||
JNK lg | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[63] | NF-κB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[64] | ||||
JNK sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[63] | PKCμ2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[65] | ||||
ERK2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[66] | RSK | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[67] | ||||
ERK1 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[66] | Finding: Our study confirms the regulatory effects of JNK sh/ lg on IL-10. | |||||||
Finding: Our study suggests the novel regulatory effect of RSK on TNFα. | |||||||||||
MIP-1α | P38 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[57] | - This study doesn’t confirm the regulatory effects of STAT1α/β/3 on MIP-1α suggested by one study [68]. The PCR minimal model [34] identifies the impact of STAT1α on MIP-1a. | RANTES | STAT3 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[69] | - Unlike the PCR minimal model [34], this study successfully captures the regulatory impacts of STAT1α/3/5 on RANTES. |
(Anti-inflammatory) | NF-κB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[70] | (Anti-inflammatory) | STAT5 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[71] | ||
cAMP | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[72] | STAT1α | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[73] | ||||
RSK | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[74] | NF-κB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[75] | ||||
JNK lg | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[76] | P38 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[77] | ||||
JNK sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[76] | PKCμ2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[78] | ||||
AKT | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[79] | JNK sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[75] | ||||
ERK1 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[74] | JNK lg | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[75] | ||||
ERK2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[74] | RSK | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[80] | ||||
STAT1α | ✘ | ✓ | ✓[68] | ERK2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[80] | ||||
STAT1β | ✘ | ✘ | ✓[68] | ERK1 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[80] | ||||
STAT3 | ✘ | ✘ | ✓[68] | IL-1α | ERK2 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[81] | |||
(Pro-inflammatory) | ERK1 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[81] | |||||||
RSK | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[82] | ||||||||
P38 | ✓ | ✘ | ✓[83] | ||||||||
JNK lg | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[84] | ||||||||
JNK sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[84] | ||||||||
NF-κB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓[85] |