Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison with other methods.

From: A graph kernel method for DNA-binding site prediction

Proteins Graph Kernel1 DISPLAR2 MV3
  Coverage Accuracy Coverage Accuracy Coverage Accuracy
1a2p 0.45 4 0.90 0.44 0.33 0.45 0.45
1ikn 0.46 0.60 0.46 0.38 0.46 0.39
1lqc 0.95 0.56 0.95 0.68 0.95 0.49
1qqi 0.70 0.67 0.75 0.66 0.70 0.33
1zzk 0.40 0.53 0.37 0.47 0.40 0.53
1qc9 0.55 0.41 0.58 0.66 0.55 0.23
2alc 0.90 0.67 0.90 0.59 0.75 0.47
1ko9 0.50 1.00 0.48 0.80 0.50 0.89
1qzq 0.57 0.63 0.57 0.24 0.57 1.00
1l3k 0.44 0.56 0.44 0.68 0.44 0.63
1xx8 0.74 0.93 0.60 0.92 0.74 0.32
1g6n 0.48 0.73 0.77 0.75 0.48 0.52
1 mml 0.46 0.35 0.38 0.50 0.46 0.40
  1. 1 The method proposed in this study; 2 The DISPLAR method developed by Tjong and Zhou [7]; 3 The MV method developed by [9]; 4 The bold font shows the best performance among the three methods on each protein.