Methods | Acc(%) | MCC | SN(%) | SP(%) | AUC(%) |
---|
AvePscore-20a | 73.95 | 0.480 | 68.57 | 79.09 | 81.40 |
AvePscore-400d | 73.58 | 0.470 | 66.47 | 80.36 | 81.50 |
Pscore-100c | 73.12 | 0.463 | 72.76 | 73.45 | 80.50 |
ACCd | 73.77 | 0.475 | 73.14 | 74.36 | 81.90 |
PSSM-DTf | 79.96 | 0.622 | 81.91 | 78.00 | 86.50 |
- The four protein representation methods in the front of the table are four protein encoding methods for identification of DNA-binding proteins proposed in the past. The four methods and the current method PSSM-DT are based on PSSMs property of protein sequences, but the encoding method applied by them are different. The results were got by testing on benchmark dataset through jackknife validation.
- aresults obtained by in-house implementation of AvePscore-20 [21]
- bresults obtained by in-house implementation of AvePscore-400 [21]
- cresults obtained by in-house implementation of Pscore-100 [75]
- dresults obtained by in-house implementation of ACC [76]
- fresults obtained by using PSSM-DT as protein representation