Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison for 8-way network alignment.

From: Accurate multiple network alignment through context-sensitive random walk

  DMC DMR CG
  CN SPE MNE CN SPE MNE CN SPE MNE
Proposed 6,621.3 0.901 0.080 6,467.2 0.891 0.090 6,345.4 0.884 0.090
SMETANA 6,336.7 0.869 0.106 6,195.2 0.860 0.114 6,481.2 0.897 0.079
BEAMS 6,083.1 0.825 0.163 6,063.5 0.826 0.162 6,537.6 0.877 0.111
NetCoffee 5,127.2 0.757 0.206 5,084.1 0.750 0.213 4,944.1 0.724 0.239
IsoRankN 4,069.1 0.644 0.268 3,916.7 0.623 0.284 3,860 0.612 0.291
Proposed (all 8 species) 4116 0.961 0.034 3473.7 0.930 0.059 3689.5 0.945 0.043
SMETANA (all 8 species) 3686.7 0.920 0.066 3348.9 0.907 0.075 3785.6 0.960 0.031
BEAMS (all 8 species) 2897.9 0.905 0.095 3054.7 0.901 0.099 3475.1 0.989 0.011
NetCoffee (all 8 species) 3300.8 0.837 0.136 3331.8 0.822 0.148 3317.8 0.800 0.172
IsoRankN (all 8 species) 2002.8 0.569 0.284 1775.8 0.542 0.303 2161.6 0.536 0.303