Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality statistics of GEM-PRO models

From: Systems biology of the structural proteome

Model

PDB coveragea

Homology model coverageb

PDB quality scorec

Homology model quality (TM-score)d

T. maritima

136/478

342

0.82 (0.86)

0.79

E. coli

490/1366

1366

0.77 (0.95)

0.82

  1. aNumber of total genes with PDB structures (includes minimally modified) after QC/QA; bNumber of total genes with homology models. Note that there may be overlap between PDB and homology model coverage; cMean quality score of PDB structures in the GEM-PRO model for all available PDB structures. In parentheses are the subset of “best representative structures” for all metabolic gene (as ranked by the QC/QA pipeline), scaled (0, 1] where 0 is low quality and 1 is the highest quality; dMean quality score of the homology models taken from the I-TASSER TM-score metric, is the range [0,1] with a value >0.5 implying correct topology of the model [28]