Skip to main content

Table 1 Simulation results compared the number of true positives among different methods

From: High-dimensional omics data analysis using a variable screening protocol with prior knowledge integration (SKI)

Positivea

1%

5%

10%

%b

σ 2 x c

σ 2 z d

α e

SISf

SKIg

Ph

SIS

SKI

P

SIS

SKI

P

0.0

1

1

0.075

38.96

38.94

36.36

45.78

45.72

43.63

47.66

47.63

45.63

0.5

1

1

0.275

38.53

43.06

45.22

45.66

47.65

48.54

47.53

48.85

49.13

1.0

1

1

0.384

38.5

46.34

47.99

45.65

48.9

49.58

47.49

49.51

49.83

0.0

1

3

0.090

39.10

38.97

35.01

45.81

45.80

42.94

47.71

47.72

44.03

0.5

1

3

0.249

38.92

42.55

43.85

45.80

47.31

48.28

47.57

48.55

49.10

1.0

1

3

0.368

39.04

45.81

47.58

45.88

48.60

49.44

47.65

49.21

49.73

0.0

3

1

0.113

36.84

36.43

35.77

44.61

44.01

43.37

46.69

46.57

46.19

0.5

3

1

0.261

37.27

42.16

44.90

45.15

47.36

48.34

47.07

48.56

49.03

1.0

3

1

0.374

36.91

46.01

48.89

44.76

49.42

49.51

47.12

49.86

49.90

0.0

3

3

0.104

37.84

37.48

35.19

45.73

45.43

44.07

47.63

47.53

45.93

0.5

3

3

0.264

37.26

42.52

44.48

45.03

47.35

48.26

47.19

48.58

49.00

1.0

3

3

0.355

37.05

45.20

47.37

45.1

48.6

49.39

47.05

49.36

49.76

  1. aTop 1, 5 and 10% variables were selected respectively under different settings
  2. bthe percentage of non-zero β’s overlapped with each other in two datasets
  3. c σ 2 x : the variance added in internal dataset to generate response Y x
  4. d σ 2 z : the variance added in external dataset to generate response Y z
  5. e α: the estimated value of α which control the weight of two ranks in geometric mean
  6. fSIS: variables were sorted by marginal correlation using only internal dataset
  7. gSKI: variables were sorted by weighted geometric mean of two marginal correlation based ranks using two dataset
  8. hPool: two dataset were pooled together and treated as a single dataset, and then variables were sorted by marginal correlation