Skip to main content

Table 2 Simulation results compared the number of true positives among iterative and non-iterative approaches when top 1% variables were selected

From: High-dimensional omics data analysis using a variable screening protocol with prior knowledge integration (SKI)

%a

ρ b

α c

SISd

SKIe

iSISf

iSKIg

0

0.3

0.061

23.32

23.12

25.22

22.53

0.5

0.3

0.342

24.83

33.20

26.13

34.43

1

0.3

0.443

23.14

34.41

26.33

38.85

0

0.6

0.044

37.35

36.34

41.11

36.17

0.5

0.6

0.392

36.47

41.67

39.67

44.83

1

0.6

0.453

37.12

45.83

40.44

49.40

  1. a%: the percentage of non-zero β’s overlapped with each other in two datasets
  2. b ρ: correlation coefficients between two neighbor variables in each cluster
  3. c α: the estimated value of α which control the weight of two ranks in geometric mean
  4. dSIS: variables were sorted by marginal correlation using only internal dataset
  5. eiSIS: iterative version of SIS
  6. fSKI: variables were sorted by weighted geometric mean of two marginal correlation based ranks using two dataset
  7. giSKI: iterative version of SKI