Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison results

From: PINTnet: construction of condition-specific pathway interaction network by computing shortest paths on weighted PPI

(a)

Data

PINTnet

OGB

 

Evidence-supported a

All b

Evidence-supported a

All b

Dataset1

9

92

1

109

Dataset2

15

122

2

268

Dataset3

1

149

1

291

(b)

Data

PINTnet

OGB

 

Evidence-supported c

All d

Evidence-supported c

All d

Dataset1

9.500

3.067

3.800

2.344

Dataset2

9.700

3.697

4.000

3.829

Dataset3

5.000

2.922

6.000

4.376

(c)

Data

Found e

All f

 
 

PINTnet

OGB

  

Dataset1

8

6

8

 

Dataset2

10

9

10

 

Dataset3

6

4

6

 
  1. (a) The number of edges between the pathways in the pathway interaction network. The first column of each approach is the number of edges between the evidence-supported pathways. The second column of each approach is the number of edges between all pathways in the network
  2. (b) The average degree of the pathways in the pathway interaction network. The first column of each approach is the average degree of the evidence-supported pathways. The second column of each approach is that of all pathways in the network
  3. (c) The number of evidence-supported pathway found in the network. The first column is the number of evidence-supported pathways that are found in the pathway interaction network constructed using our method. The second column is the number of evidence-supported pathways that are found in the pathway interaction network constructed using OGB. The third column is the number of all evidence-supported pathways
  4. aThe number of edges connecting the evidence-supported pathways
  5. bThe total number of edges in the pathway interaction network
  6. cThe average degree of the evidence-supported pathways
  7. dThe average degree of all pathways in the pathway interaction network
  8. eThe number of evidence-supported pathways in the pathway interaction networks constructed using both approaches
  9. fThe total number of evidence-supported pathways