Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Comparison by GO enrichment analysis

From: Finding low-conductance sets with dense interactions (FLCD) for better protein complex prediction

Network Method # complex % enriched # GO        
SceDIP FLCD 2134 72.2 1442        
  CONE 380 71.8 852        
  LinkC 1839 67.4 1273        
  SR-MCL 2851 23.5 957        
SceBG FLCD 4027 72.4 1800        
  CONE 522 77.4 1282        
  LinkC 5382 39.8 1554        
  SR-MCL 1862 56.4 1702        
SceIntAct FLCD 3394 62.4 1414        
  CONE 496 65.6 1031        
  LinkC 1297 46.5 1129        
  SR-MCL 1079 44.7 888        
SceMINT FLCD 2483 62.3 1416        
  CONE 513 59.4 954        
  LinkC 2201 32.1 1123        
  SR-MCL 3698 19.7 856        
  1. “% enriched” presents the percentage of complexes that are enriched with at least one GO term. “# GO” denotes the number of enriched GO terms
  2. Bold values denote the best scores corresponding to specific criteria