Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of TS-compound pairs versus RPairs

From: Identification of reaction organization patterns that naturally cluster enzymatic transformations

Cluster ID

Number of total reactions

Number of reactions with only matching pairs

Number of reactions with no matched pairs

Number of reactions with mixed pair matches

Number of RPAIRs in a CTS

Number of matching TS-compound pairs

Number of mismatched TS-compound pairs

Inferior interval 0.025

Superior interval 0.975

Average value of the interval

General

6392

4869

618

905

11,193

8966

2127

0.8006

0.8153

0.8070

CTS-1

1627

960

391

276

3254

2196

1058

0.6587

0.6909

0.6748

CTS-2

1059

1016

43

0

1059

1016

43

0.9467

0.9704

0.9586

CTS-3

1028

926

102

0

1028

926

102

0.8818

0.9183

0.9

CTS-4

897

867

8

22

1794

1756

38

0.9717

0.985

0.9783

CTS-5

439

435

1

3

878

873

5

0.9884

0.9981

0.9933

CTS-6

349

341

0

8

698

690

8

0.9794

0.995

0.9872

CTS-7

150

1

17

132

450

206

244

0.412

0.5039

0.458

CTS-8

143

57

7

79

286

193

93

0.6195

0.7278

0.6737

CTS-9

103

51

3

49

206

151

55

0.6707

0.791

0.7309

CTS-10

97

2

0

95

291

196

95

0.6187

0.7261

0.6724

CTS-11

82

0

0

82

246

163

83

0.6024

0.7203

0.6613

CTS-12

66

58

8

0

66

58

8

0.7906

0.9453

0.868

CTS-13

54

39

7

8

108

86

22

0.7158

0.8664

0.7911

CTS-14

42

21

5

16

84

58

26

0.5882

0.7841

0.6862

CTS-15

29

28

0

1

58

57

1

0.9373

0.9996

0.9684

CTS-16

26

0

0

26

78

29

49

0.2687

0.4812

0.3749

CTS-17

24

0

0

24

72

48

24

0.5545

0.77

0.6623

CTS-18

16

8

0

8

48

37

11

0.6434

0.877

0.7602

CTS-19

14

5

6

3

28

13

15

0.2867

0.6467

0.4667

CTS-20

12

11

1

0

12

11

1

0.7151

0.9977

0.8564

CTS-21

12

4

3

5

24

13

11

0.3449

0.7318

0.5384

CTS-22

10

6

1

3

20

15

5

0.5443

0.9085

0.7264

  1. We compared the numbers of hits and fails of our predicted pairs with RPairs in the KEGG RPAIR dataset. The table presents precision estimations based on the calculated posterior probabilities of each group. The confidence interval and average value are shown in the last 3 columns