Selection method | 5 ∘
| 10 ∘
| 20 ∘
|
|---|
I | 16.6687 (0.0229) | 16.5143 (0.0190) | 13.9354 (0.0125) |
II | 3.1672 (0.0285) | 94.7590 (0.0072) | 138.2400 (0.0044) |
III | 40.7405 (0.1000) | 8.7522 (0.0557) | 36.6450 (0.1692) |
IV | 19.1386 (0.0202) | 17.3887 (0.0106) | 13.1121 (0.0013) |
- Results are shown for each method used to select the final solution. Method I selects the solution that minimises the Euclidean
- distance between the Pareto front and the objective space origin; method II selects the best fit to a 5 deg saccade (objective 1);
- method III selects the best fit to a 10 deg saccade (objective 2); and method IV selects the best fit to a 20 deg saccade
- (objective 3). Mean fitness values and coefficients of variation (shown in brackets) were calculated from 16 runs of NSGA-II
- for a population size of 8000. Fitness values were normalised by the number of points in each velocity profile
