Rational design of ^{13}Clabeling experiments for metabolic flux analysis in mammalian cells
 Scott B Crown^{1},
 Woo Suk Ahn^{1} and
 Maciek R Antoniewicz^{1}Email author
DOI: 10.1186/17520509643
© Crown et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 November 2011
Accepted: 17 April 2012
Published: 16 May 2012
Abstract
Background
^{13}CMetabolic flux analysis (^{13}CMFA) is a standard technique to probe cellular metabolism and elucidate in vivo metabolic fluxes. ^{13}CTracer selection is an important step in conducting ^{13}CMFA, however, current methods are restricted to trialanderror approaches, which commonly focus on an arbitrary subset of the tracer design space. To systematically probe the complete tracer design space, especially for complex systems such as mammalian cells, there is a pressing need for new rational approaches to identify optimal tracers.
Results
Recently, we introduced a new framework for optimal ^{13}Ctracer design based on elementary metabolite units (EMU) decomposition, in which a measured metabolite is decomposed into a linear combination of socalled EMU basis vectors. In this contribution, we applied the EMU method to a realistic network model of mammalian metabolism with lactate as the measured metabolite. The method was used to select optimal tracers for two free fluxes in the system, the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (oxPPP) flux and anaplerosis by pyruvate carboxylase (PC). Our approach was based on sensitivity analysis of EMU basis vector coefficients with respect to free fluxes. Through efficient grouping of coefficient sensitivities, simple tracer selection rules were derived for highresolution quantification of the fluxes in the mammalian network model. The approach resulted in a significant reduction of the number of possible tracers and the feasible tracers were evaluated using numerical simulations. Two optimal, novel tracers were identified that have not been previously considered for ^{13}CMFA of mammalian cells, specifically [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose for elucidating oxPPP flux and [3,4^{13}C]glucose for elucidating PC flux. We demonstrate that ^{13}Cglutamine tracers perform poorly in this system in comparison to the optimal glucose tracers.
Conclusions
In this work, we have demonstrated that optimal tracer design does not need to be a pure simulationbased trialanderror process; rather, rational insights into tracer design can be gained through the application of the EMU basis vector methodology. Using this approach, rational labeling rules can be established a priori to guide the selection of optimal ^{13}Ctracers for highresolution flux elucidation in complex metabolic network models.
Keywords
Metabolic flux analysis Stableisotope tracers Experiment design Pathway analysis Statistical analysis Confidence intervals Mammalian cells Free fluxes Mass spectrometryBackground
^{13}CMetabolic flux analysis (^{13}CMFA) has become a standard tool to probe cellular metabolism and elucidate in vivo metabolic fluxes [1–5]. The experimental portion of ^{13}CMFA relies on the introduction of an isotopic tracer (e.g. ^{13}Cglucose) to a cell culture, cellular turnover of ^{13}Clabeled metabolites through metabolic pathways, and measurement of ^{13}Clabeling patterns of metabolites by NMR [6], mass spectrometry (MS) [7–9], or tandem MS [10, 11]. The computational portion of ^{13}CMFA relates the measured ^{13}Clabeling patterns to metabolic fluxes by iterative leastsquares regression. Inherent to successful ^{13}CMFA are high quality measurement data and efficient computer algorithms for simulating isotopomers [12–14], both of which have been investigated in detail. However, an important aspect of ^{13}CMFA that is often overlooked is the selection of appropriate ^{13}Ctracers to study a given biological system. ^{13}CTracers are often selected by convention, or using trialanderror approaches. With the increasing use of ^{13}CMFA in mammalian systems for therapeutic and industrial applications [15–20], it is surprising to find that literature on the topic of rational tracer selection for ^{13}CMFA is rather limited.
There are many possible choices for ^{13}Ctracers in mammalian cultures. Mammalian cells are generally cultured in complex media containing multiple substrates, including glucose, glutamine (and other amino acids), fatty acids and organic acids. Each of these substrates could potentially be selected as the ^{13}Ctracer. In the past, ^{13}Cglucose, ^{13}Cglutamine [21, 22], ^{13}Cpropionate [23, 24], and ^{13}Cglycerol [25], among others [24–26], have been applied to investigate fluxes in mammalian cells. Currently, the most popular choices are ^{13}Cglucose and ^{13}Cglutamine tracers, as these compounds are readily metabolized by most mammalian cells. Previously, Metallo et al. [17] evaluated several commercially available ^{13}Cglucose and ^{13}Cglutamine tracers for studying mammalian metabolism. From a select list of available isotopic tracers, Metallo identified optimal tracers for specific metabolic pathways. Recently, Walther et al. [27] developed a genetic algorithm to optimize mixtures of ^{13}Cglucose and ^{13}Cglutamine tracers for MFA in mammalian cells. However, because both of these works were based on simulations using a limited number of tracers, they offered no true insights into rational criteria for optimal tracer selection and potentially missed novel and more informative tracers for determining fluxes in mammalian cells.
Central to the ^{13}Ctracer experiment design problem are two interconnected issues: 1) how should the optimal tracer be determined; and 2) how should the isotopic experiment be conducted. First, there are many possible tracer substrates commercially available with various ^{13}Clabeling patterns. In addition, the possibility to purchase custom synthesized tracers has become a viable option. Moreover, multiple ^{13}Ctracers can be applied in a single tracer experiment [28–30], or alternatively, multiple parallel labeling experiments can be performed using a single or multiple ^{13}Ctracers [22, 31, 32]. All of these options increase the complexity of the tracer experiment design space. The number of tracer options quickly increases to a point where it is no longer feasible to efficiently evaluate all possible tracer combinations using simulations and trialanderror approaches. Therefore, there is a pressing need for new rational approaches for designing tracer experiments to systematically identify optimal tracers, or at least reduce the search space to a computationally more manageable level.
Recently, we introduced a new framework for optimal ^{13}Ctracer experiment design based on elementary metabolite units (EMU) decomposition, in which a measured metabolite is decomposed into a linear combination of socalled EMU basis vectors [33]. Our methodology decouples isotopic labeling from flux dependencies in a network model, thus allowing us to draw rational conclusions regarding tracer feasibility, and as such reduce the number of tracer candidates. In this work, we applied the EMU method to a realistic network model of mammalian metabolism, specifically, to the network model proposed by Henry et al. [31] for HEK293 cell lines with lactate as the measured metabolite. This system is of general interest because it covers all major metabolic pathways of central carbon metabolism and uses an easily accessible extracellular metabolite, i.e. lactate, that is produced by many mammalian cells. The network model of Henry has two free fluxes of interest that must be estimated from ^{13}Clabeling data, the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (oxPPP) flux and pyruvate carboxylase (PC) flux.
In this work, we used the EMU tracer experiment design approach to select optimal tracers in the described system. Our approach is based on sensitivity analysis of EMU basis vector coefficients with respect to free fluxes in the model. Through efficient grouping of coefficient sensitivities, simple tracer selection rules were derived for high resolution of the fluxes in the model. The approach resulted in a significant reduction of the number of possible tracers. The feasible tracers were evaluated using numerical simulations to identify optimal tracers for elucidation of both oxPPP and PC fluxes. The optimal tracers that were identified in this work are novel tracers that have not been previously considered for ^{13}CMFA of mammalian cells; specifically, [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose for elucidating oxPPP flux and [3,4^{13}C]glucose for elucidating PC flux. We demonstrate that ^{13}Cglutamine tracers perform poorly in this system in comparison to the optimal glucose tracers.
Results and discussion
Mammalian network model
EMU basis vector decomposition of mammalian network model
Metabolic fluxes in the network model used for data simulation
Flux  Wild type (WT)  PC cells (PYC) 

Gluc.ext → G6P  1.00  1.00 
G6P → R5P + CO_{2}  0.29  0.08 
GAP → Pyr  1.88  1.93 
Pyr → Lac  0.95  0.30 
OAC + AcCoA → AKG + CO_{2}  0.89  1.88 
Pyr + CO_{2} → OAC  0.00  0.84 
Mal → OAC  0.89  1.10 
Mal → Pyr + CO_{2}  0.15  1.11 
Glycolysis and oxPPP accounted for ~93% of EMU basis vector contributions to lactate in WT cells. In contrast, due to a larger malic enzyme flux in PCexpressing cells, glycolysis and oxPPP contributed only ~63% to lactate in PYC cells. The remaining 37% of contributions resulted from anaplerosis. The two main anaplerotic reactions in this system were PC and glutaminolysis, and the largest single fractional contribution to lactate was from the EMU basic vector ‘uuu’ (u = unlabeled), that is, from EMU basis vector comprised of “nontracer” substrates (~3.5%). The two dominant glutaminolysis contributions, Gln_{234} and Gln_{345}, accounted for ~3% of the total contribution to lactate. The remaining contributions from glutamine EMUs were divided among 78 EMU basis vectors and contributed ~5% to lactate. The remaining ~25% of contributions were distributed among more than 40 EMU basis vectors, with no single contribution larger than 1.3%.
EMU coefficient sensitivities and tracer experiment design strategy
The EMU basis vector coefficients provide valuable information regarding the dominant metabolic pathways in the system for a given set of fluxes. However, to address the tracer experiment design problem, i.e. how to select optimal tracers to accurately estimate fluxes in the model, additional information is needed. Specifically, the sensitivities of coefficients with respect to the free fluxes in the model provide useful additional data. Figure 2C shows the sensitivities calculated for the PYC flux map. The sensitivities quantify how the coefficients of EMU basis vectors are affected by changes in fluxes. A large sensitivity (either positive or negative) indicates that an EMU basis vector contribution changes significantly in response to a small change in a flux, and therefore, may be a good target for optimal tracer selection.
 1)
Calculate EMU basis vector sensitivities for all free fluxes in the model
 2)
Identify the largest magnitude coefficient sensitivities for each free flux
 3)
Construct labeling rules to minimize the overlap of oppositesigned sensitivities (i.e. to prevent canceling out of sensitivities)
 4)
Construct labeling rules to maximize the overlap of samesigned sensitivities (i.e. to maximize the sensitivities of isotopomers)
 5)
List isotopic tracers that are consistent with the labeling rules and evaluate them by numerical simulations
In the next two sections we demonstrate how the above procedure can provide labeling rules to help in the selection of optimal tracer substrates and labeling patterns for the mammalian network model. By systematically applying the labeling rules we can drastically reduce the number of potential tracers to be evaluated by numerical simulations. Here, we demonstrate the application of this strategy to determine optimal tracers for elucidating the oxPPP and PC fluxes in the mammalian network model.
Rational selection of tracers for estimating oxidative pentose phosphate pathway flux
To minimize the overlap of oppositesigned sensitivities (i.e. to prevent canceling out of sensitivities for lactate mass isotopomers), the EMU basis vectors with the positive sensitivities must not produce the same mass isotopomers as Gluc_{123}. This criterion leads to a set of simple labeling rules that are shown in Figure 3B and depicted schematically in Figure 3C. First, Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{2} should differ from Gluc_{123}. This can be achieved only if glucose carbons 1 and 2 are labeled differently. Similarly, Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{3} must be different from Gluc_{123}, which requires that carbons 1 and 3 of glucose are labeled differently. For pure tracers, these two rules require that glucose carbons 2 and 3 are labeled in the same way (i.e. either both labeled or both unlabeled), hence combining the samesigned sensitivities, Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{2} and Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{3}. Based on these two labeling rules it is clear that the first three carbon atoms of glucose must take the form of Gluc_{100xxx} or Gluc_{011xxx} (x = unspecified). The positive sensitivity value for Gluc_{456} sets the final constraints on the labeling of glucose. First, Gluc_{456} should differ from Gluc_{123}; and second, Gluc_{456} should produce the same mass isotopomer as Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{2} and Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{3}. With these rules, the list of 64 possible glucose tracers is narrowed down to only two glucose tracers, Gluc_{100000} (i.e. [1^{13}C]glucose) and Gluc_{011111} (i.e. [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose). The magnitude of the negative sensitivities for glucose tracers are shown in Additional file 3, Figure 1A. The tracers with the largest negative sensitivities all had the predicted labeling pattern of Gluc_{100xxx} or Gluc_{011xxx}. The sensitivity analysis also revealed that glutamine tracers need not be considered as potential candidates for estimating oxPPP flux, since glutamine sensitivities were ordersofmagnitude smaller than glucose sensitivities for the oxPPP flux.
Rational selection of tracers for estimating pyruvate carboxylase flux
To maximize the magnitude of the negative sensitivities, Gluc_{123} and Gluc_{456} should produce the same mass isotopomer (i.e. Gluc_{123} = Gluc_{456}), which is the first labeling rule for the PC flux shown in Figure 4B. The other rules are based on preventing the positive sensitivities from canceling out the two large negative sensitivities and efficiently grouping of the positive sensitivities. To prevent canceling out sensitivities, the EMU basis vector ‘uuu’ should be different from Gluc_{123} and Gluc_{456}; in other words, at least one atom in Gluc_{123} must be labeled and at least one atom in Gluc_{456} must be labeled. Next, Gluc_{5} × uu and Gluc_{2} × uu should be different from Gluc_{123} and Gluc_{456}, requiring that Gluc_{13} is labeled, and Gluc_{46} is labeled. These first four rules create constraints that all candidate tracers should obey.
Further investigation of the positive sensitivities highlights that several sensitivities can be grouped if Gluc_{2} = Gluc_{5} (e.g. Gluc_{5} × uu = Gluc_{2} × uu). The remaining rules, 6 – 9, in Figure 4B originate from preventing the overlap of the negative sensitivities of Gluc_{123} and Gluc_{456} with the remaining positive sensitivities (e.g. Gluc_{56} × Gluc_{5} must differ from Gluc_{456}, which is only accomplished if Gluc_{4} is not the same as Gluc_{5}). The tracer selection process is shown schematically in Figure 4C. With these rules, the list of 64 possible glucose tracers narrows down to only three potential glucose tracers, Gluc_{001100} (i.e. [3,4^{13}C]glucose), Gluc_{110011} (i.e. [1,2,5,6^{13}C]glucose), and Gluc_{101101} (i.e. [1,3,4,6^{13}C]glucose). The magnitude of the negative sensitivities for glucose tracers are shown in Additional file 3, Figure 1B. This analysis also reveals that glutamine tracers need not be considered as candidates for estimating the PC flux, since glutamine sensitivities were significantly smaller than glucose sensitivities. The two largest glutamine sensitivities were for Gln_{234} (+0.5) and Gln_{345} (+0.5).
Comparison of tracers for mammalian network model
To demonstrate the effectiveness of our EMU methodology for tracer selection, we numerically simulated confidence intervals for all pure tracers, i.e. 64 glucose and 32 glutamine tracers. For each tracer, the lactate MID was calculated based on the PYC flux map, and then ^{13}CMFA was conducted to estimate fluxes and flux confidence intervals. The simulation results determined that the optimal tracer for the oxPPP flux was [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose and for the PC flux was [3,4^{13}C]glucose. Both of these tracers were predicted through the rational selection of tracers described in the two sections above. Confidence intervals for the optimal and other representative tracers are shown in Additional file 4. For the oxPPP flux, several other tracers had confidence intervals that approached but did not outperform [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose. As predicted by our methodology these tracers all corresponded to glucose labeling as Gluc_{100xxx} or Gluc_{011xxx}. Unlike Gluc_{011111}, these tracers violated rules 5 and 6 in Figure 3B, but their violation had minimal effect as the large negative sensitivity of Gluc_{123} was preserved. For the PC flux, [3,4^{13}C]glucose performed the best, and the second optimal tracer, [1,2,5,6^{13}C]glucose, was also predicted by our rational design criteria. These results correspond well with the observation regarding the positive sensitivities: there were >20 positive sensitivities, ranging from (+0.3 to +1.0), however, none of these sensitivities has Gluc_{3} or Gluc_{4} in the EMU basis vectors. As a result, the choice of Gluc_{3} and Gluc_{4} affected only the EMU basis vectors Gluc_{123} and Gluc_{456}. If Gluc_{3} = Gluc_{4}, the negative sensitivities can easily be segregated from the positive sensitivities. For example, if Gluc_{3} and Gluc_{4} are labeled, choosing the other glucose carbons to be unlabeled (Gluc_{001100}) results in no overlap between the positive sensitivities and Gluc_{123}/Gluc_{456}. Also, if Gluc_{3} and Gluc_{4} are unlabeled, labeling the remaining glucose carbons (Gluc_{110011}) results in minimal cancelling of sensitivities. Thus, it is not surprising that [3,4^{13}C]glucose and [1,2,5,6^{13}C]glucose were the two best tracers for PC flux resolution.
Finally, we evaluated the use of tracer mixtures. Mixtures of the optimal glucose tracers with unlabeled glucose resulted in larger confidence intervals of fluxes (see Additional file 5, Figure 3A & C). The optimal tracer, [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose, performed better than mixtures of [2,3^{13}C]glucose and [4,5,6^{13}C]glucose for oxPPP flux resolution; similarly [3,4^{13}C]glucose resulted in better PC confidence intervals than mixtures of [3^{13}C]glucose and [4^{13}C]glucose (see Additional file 5, Figure 3B & D). Overall, these results confirm that sensitivitybased criteria provide a rational approach for determining an appropriate design subspace for tracer selection that can result in drastic improvements in flux resolution.
Conclusions
^{13}CMetabolic flux analysis has been increasingly used to observe in vivo fluxes in mammalian systems [34]. However, despite recent advances in both the experimental and computational aspects of ^{13}CMFA, little thought is often given to which tracers should be selected for a given network, and perhaps more importantly why these tracers are optimal.
In this contribution, we provide a new perspective for rationalbased selection of ^{13}Ctracers. Our methodology is based on the previously described concept of EMU basis vectors [33]. The EMU basis vector methodology is a very attractive strategy for investigating tracer selection as the tracer labeling is decoupled from the flux dependencies. In contrast to simulationbased optimal design [17, 30, 35–38], we focused on rational grouping of the fluxdependent coefficient sensitivities such that we could maximize the sensitivity of a single isotopomer for each free flux. For each free flux, we sorted the coefficient sensitivities by sign and decreasing magnitude. We then identified the largest magnitude(s) sensitivities. In the case of multiple moderate to large sensitivities, we collapsed those of the same sign onto a single isotopomer, while keeping those of the opposite sign on different isotopomers. Subsequently, we attempted to further group samesigned sensitivities, with emphasis on maximizing the largest sensitivity. In this process, we created labeling rules, which set constraints on the basis vector matrix and hence the possible substrate labeling schemes. Using this rationale, we obtained a significant reduction in the number of tracers, from 96 in total (64 glucose and 32 glutamine) to a handful of possible candidates. We predicted two novel optimal tracers, which were not previously considered for mammalian systems. For the oxPPP flux we determined that [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose would be the best tracer and [3,4^{13}C]glucose would be optimal for the PC flux. When we compared these a priori selections to simulation experiments from Henry’s PYC flux map, we observed drastic improvement in flux resolution for both the oxPPP and PC fluxes.
One practical insight this contribution provides is in the identification of feasible substrates for ^{13}Ctracers through coefficient sensitivities. For a defined network, a flux map, and a measurement set, the dc/du values are fixed (see Eq. 2). Regardless of tracer choice and the respective labeling pattern, the coefficient sensitivities will not be affected. The method proposed in this work relies on rational grouping of the coefficient sensitivities to maximize the sensitivity of a single isotopomer for each free flux. In order to do this, it is important to choose a substrate that has large dc/du values corresponding with its respective EMU basis vectors. In essence, the coefficient sensitivities can be viewed as the potential to obtaining a large measurement sensitivity. Substrates with a larger potential are inherently better suited as tracer candidates for ^{13}CMFA.
To illustrate this concept, two possible substrates were considered in this work, glucose and glutamine. Glucose EMU basis vectors had large magnitude sensitivities for both the oxPPP flux (Gluc_{123}, 16.9) and the PC flux (Gluc_{123}, 5.7; Gluc_{456}, 6.0); in contrast, the dominant glutamine EMU basis vectors had small sensitivities for the oxPPP flux (Gln_{234} = Gln_{345}, +0.2) and the PC flux (Gln_{234} = Gln_{345}, +0.5). As glutamine sensitivities were an order of magnitude smaller than glucose sensitivities, glutamine was clearly not an optimal tracer for this network with lactate as the measured metabolite. The simulation results validated this assessment, as [U^{13}C]glutamine was shown to be a poor tracer for elucidation of both the oxPPP and PC fluxes.
Intrinsically, the poor resolution of the oxPPP flux, when assessed with glutamine tracers, is reasonable as no labeling from glutamine can enter into oxPPP. More surprising is the poor resolution of the PC flux. One explanation for the poor PC flux resolution is the distance of the measurement, i.e. lactate, from glutamine and the resulting dilutions that occur at metabolites αketoglutarate and pyruvate. To remedy this issue, a TCA cycle intermediate (oxaloacetate or αketoglutarate) could be used as additional measurement; however, even if a TCA cycle intermediate is used, the measurement remains insensitive to the PC flux for [U^{13}C]glutamine (results not shown). We have demonstrated in this contribution that given a measurement, we can determine logical tracers for elucidation of a flux of interest; however, the converse, given a tracer, which measurements should be chosen to determine the flux is not trivial, or well understood. An understanding of both relationships will be crucial to designing optimal ^{13}Ctracer experiments.
This work also demonstrates why it is often difficult to resolve all fluxes in a network with high confidence. In this network model, ^{13}Clabeling rules for resolving the oxPPP flux were inherently contradicting the rules for optimally resolving the PC flux. Thus, by trying to resolve one flux better, the resolution of the other flux worsened. For example, in this work, to resolve the oxPPP flux it was desirable to have Gluc_{123} ≠ Gluc_{456}; however for the PC flux, it was pressing to have Gluc_{123} = Gluc_{456}. Both of these rules cannot be satisfied in a single tracer experiment. To select a single tracer to resolve both fluxes, the coefficient sensitivities and their magnitudes must be considered for both of the free fluxes. The most important criterion for oxPPP was that the strongly negative Gluc_{123} sensitivity collapsed on a different isotopomer than Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{2} and Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{3}. Crucial for PC flux resolution was that Gluc_{123} and Gluc_{456} produced the same isotopomer. These two constraints can be satisfied together, if the stipulation for the oxPPP rule set is relaxed, such that Gluc_{456} can differ from Gluc_{123}. Since the Gluc_{456} sensitivity is only about 2% and Gluc_{123} is almost −17%, this is a reasonable compromise. With the adapted rules, the first three carbons of glucose must be either [100] or [011] labeled, with the last three carbons being M + 1 or M + 2 labeled, respectively. Through careful selection of which tracer rules to violate, ideally ones that have a lesser impact on the maximum sensitivity for a given flux, a single tracer can be chosen to resolve both free fluxes with precision that approaches that of the optimal tracers we suggested (see Additional file 6). Another important observation regarding flux resolution corresponds to the range of the sensitivity values. In the case of the oxPPP flux, there are three dominant sensitivities (Gluc_{123}, Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{2}, and Gluc_{23} × Gluc_{3}). Violation of rules involving combinations of these three sensitivities, has drastic effect on the resulting confidence intervals. However, in the case where many sensitivities are of similar magnitude (e.g. the positive sensitivities for PC flux), violation of individual rules (5–9 in Figure 4) can have less severe consequences. For example, [2,3,4,6^{13}C]glucose in Additional file 6 violates rules 5, 7, and 9, but retains confidence intervals about twice as large as those of [3,4^{13}C]glucose.
In simple cases, such as this network, a single tracer and a single measurement may be capable of resolving all free fluxes with high fidelity; however, as the number of free fluxes increases in a network, not all sensitivity rules for each flux can be satisfied, resulting in smaller magnitudes of isotopomer sensitivity and loss of confidence in the estimated flux values. This raises an important question of how to minimize the effects of conflicting sensitivity rules, and hence improve confidence intervals. There are two feasible approaches to address this issue. The first option involves a singletracer design with the addition of more independent measurements. The additional isotopomers may allow more flexibility when satisfying the sensitivity criteria. One concern, however, is that contradictory rules may still exist and result in poor flux resolution. In this case, additional measurements may have only marginal effect on flux resolution [35], thus requiring another approach to achieve better flux results. A second alternative to improve flux resolution is to conduct parallel labeling experiments, where specific tracers are designed to be optimal for specific fluxes in the model. By integrating labeling data from such parallel labeling experiments, fluxes can be resolved at a high resolution that can never be achieved using any single tracer experiment. The obvious drawback to this method is tracer availability and cost, and the requirement of good biological reproducibility. The tracer selection methodology presented here gives clear insight into why flux resolution is challenging and highlights the need for investigation of not just tracer and measurement choice, but also the manner in which tracer experiments are conducted.
This work also offers some experimental insights regarding the usage of [1^{13}C]glucose for oxPPP resolution. The results shown here demonstrate that [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose is a more effective tracer. To further expand on this point, we numerically simulated oxPPP confidence interval for [1^{13}C]glucose and [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose. A grid search for the two free fluxes (oxPPP and PC) was conducted to evaluate the effect of the free fluxes on the resulting confidence intervals. Overall, for this network with lactate as the measurement, [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose performed as well as, and in the majority of cases, better than [1^{13}C]glucose across the entire flux space (see Additional file 7).
Another insight this work provides is into experiment design with mixtures of ^{13}Ctracers. Often times, especially in mammalian cell culture, there will be unlabeled glucose and amino acids in the media. As shown in Additional file 5, the addition of unlabeled glucose adversely affects the flux confidence intervals for the optimal tracers. This can be explained through the EMU basis vector sensitivities. For example, consider the sensitivity of Gluc_{123} for the oxPPP flux. When pure [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose is used, the full sensitivity of Gluc_{123} (−16.9) contributes to the M + 2 isotopomer; however for a 50/50 mixture of [2,3,4,5,6^{13}C]glucose and unlabeled glucose, only half of the Gluc_{123} sensitivity (−8.5) contributes to M + 2 and the other half contributes to M + 0. Unlabeled glucose in this example results in a decrease in the maximum sensitivity obtainable. As a result, the flux observability suffers. Similarly, with mixtures of [2,3^{13}C]glucose and [4,5,6^{13}C]glucose, the maximum obtainable sensitivity was decreased, also resulting in poorer confidence intervals.
Lastly, it is important to discuss the limitations of the Henry model and how it pertains to the proposed methodology. The Henry model did not include commonly accepted reaction reversibilities, such as transketolase (TK) and transaldolase (TA) in the pentose phosphate pathway as well as malate dehydrogenase (MDH). Reversibility of TK and TA will allow backmixing of labeling in the pentose phosphate pathway and the reversibility of MDH will result in additional pyruvate cycling via PC, MDH, and malic enzyme acting in tandem (i.e. pyruvate → oxaloacetate → malate → pyruvate). In general, inclusion of reversible reactions may or may not increase the number of EMU basis vectors depending on whether the reversible reactions create new, independent “EMU pathways”. The fractional contributions will change, as the coefficients will be functions of additional free fluxes. The most notable change will be in the coefficient sensitivities. In addition to sensitivities with respect to the oxPPP and PC flux, each coefficient will have a sensitivity to each reversible flux. The tracer selection process based on our methodology remains the same; however, it may not be feasible to resolve all fluxes with the given measurement(s). For example, in the system described here, lactate only has three independent mass isotopomers, i.e. assuming the complete lactate molecule is measured and no other MS fragments of lactate are available. With the addition of TK, TA, and MDH reversibilities, there will be six free fluxes, and thus it will not be possible to resolve all these fluxes with lactate as the only measurement. To demonstrate this, oxPPP and PC confidence intervals were simulated for various glucose tracers, where the network model included TK, TA, and MDH. The results are shown in Additional file 8. The uncertainty due to the inability to resolve all six free fluxes caused broadening of the confidence intervals. The bestperforming tracers for the oxPPP and PC flux, however, remained the same.
In addition to reversible reactions, compartmentation was also neglected in the Henry model, meaning that parallel reactions in the cytosol and mitochondria were not distinguished in this model. Experimentally, measuring fluxes in separate compartments is difficult without isolation of metabolites located in the different cellular compartments [39]. As advances are made to overcome this technical challenge, the methodology we have presented here will still be applicable, as the rational steps proposed are independent of the model. Regardless of the number of free fluxes, sensitivity criteria can be applied to evaluate principles for each free flux. As the model complexity increases, however, more measurements or parallel experiments may be necessary as discussed above.
In summary, the results in this paper demonstrate that optimal tracer experiment design does not need to be a pure simulationbased trialanderror process. But rather, rational insights into tracer design can be gained through application of the EMU basis vector methodology. Through careful analysis of sensitivities, with focus on maximizing isotopomer sensitivity, labeling rules can be constructed, which guide the selection of ^{13}Ctracers for a given network. Depending on the size and complexity of the network, the proposed methodology may provide a single optimal tracer, as in [3,4^{13}C]glucose for the PC flux; or perhaps more likely, the method will provide a reduced list of feasible tracers. This reduction of plausible tracer schemes, whether complete or partial, can significantly ease the computational burden for further tracer experiment design optimization. Going forward, further emphasis should be placed on understanding the interdependencies between measurements in conjunction with a rational selection of tracers and the overarching philosophy of isotopic experiment design. One important issue to address is whether a tracer experiment should be completed in isolation, i.e. one tracer experiment to elucidate all the fluxes, or whether parallel experiments are better suited, i.e. several tracer experiments with each resolving a different subset of the fluxes. Ultimately, further investigation of the correlations between flux resolution, the measurement set, and the ^{13}Ctracer must be conducted. A deeper understanding of these relationships will allow for more powerful isotopic experiment design for ^{13}CMFA.
Methods
Nomenclature
The tracer experiment design framework presented here is built using mass isotopomer distributions (MIDs) of EMUs as state variables [13]. An EMU is defined as a specific subset of metabolite’s atoms. We use a subscript notation to denote atoms present in an EMU. For example, A_{234} indicates that the EMU is comprised of atoms 2, 3, and 4 of metabolite A. Furthermore, a subscript notation (with ones and zeros) is used to denote the labeling patterns of isotopomers. For example, A_{1100} indicates that metabolite A has four atoms and that atoms 1 and 2 are labeled and atoms 3 and 4 are unlabeled.
In this study, we only consider pure tracers (i.e. not mixtures of tracers), which means that the MID of an EMU such as Gluc_{123} is equivalent to any convolution of EMUs involving the same atoms, e.g. Gluc_{123} will produce same MID as Gluc_{12} × Gluc_{3}.
An EMU basis vector is a unique way for assembling substrate EMUs to form the measured metabolite. The MID of the measured metabolite is a linear combination of EMU basis vector MIDs. The coefficients are solely a function of free fluxes and quantify the “weights” of each EMU basis vector to the measurement [33].
Network model
The reaction network model of mammalian metabolism by Henry et al. [31] consists of central carbon metabolic pathways, including glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, tricarboxylic acid cycle, anaplerotic and cataplerotic reactions, as well as metabolism of amino acids. Reversible reactions and intracellular compartmentation were not taken into account in this model; however, scrambling of ^{13}Clabeling due to rotational symmetry of fumarate and succinate was considered. In total, the model contains 29 reactions and 29 metabolites, with 15 balanced intracellular metabolites and 13 measured extracellular metabolites (see Additional file 1). The thirteen fluxes fixed by the external measurements are shown with dashed arrows in Figure 1. The model has two degrees of freedom, the oxidative pentose phosphate flux (oxPPP, G6P → R5P + CO_{2}) and pyruvate carboxylase flux (PC, Pyr + CO_{2} → OAC). Lactate mass isotopomers provide the additional constraints needed to determine the two free fluxes in the model. The Henry network model contains several substrates, including glucose and various amino acids. In this work, glucose and glutamine were considered the main carbon sources that could be ^{13}Clabeled, while the remaining amino acids were treated as unlabeled. The identities of unlabeled amino acid substrates were collectively referred to as “nontracer” substrates in the EMU decomposition. The two flux maps estimated by Henry et al. for HEK293 cells (WT) and PCexpressing HEK293 cells (PYC) were used as reference in this study. The PYC flux map was used for simulations and for optimal tracer experiment design.
EMU decomposition
EMU decomposition of the metabolic network model was accomplished using Metran software [22]. The resulting EMU networks were decoupled into separate and smaller subnetworks using the technique described by Young et al. [40], and simplified using the technique described by Antoniewicz et al. [13]. The EMU basis vectors for extracellular lactate were enumerated using the technique by Crown and Antoniewicz [33]. In the context of this work, an EMU basis vector refers to a unique way of assembling substrate EMUs to form the secreted product lactate. The MID of lactate can be interpreted as a linear combination of EMU basis vector MIDs. The EMU basis vector coefficients quantify the fractional contribution of each EMU basis vector to the observed labeling of lactate. Coefficient sensitivities were calculated using finite differences as before [33].
Metabolic flux analysis
^{13}CMFA was performed using Metran software, which is built on the EMU framework. In short, fluxes were estimated by minimizing the varianceweighted sum of squared residuals between the simulated and modelpredicted MIDs using leastsquares regression [41]. In all cases, flux estimation was repeated at least ten times starting with random initial values for all fluxes to find a global solution. At convergence, standard deviations, and 68% and 95% confidence intervals for all fluxes were calculated using the parameter continuation technique [41]. The technique is based on evaluating the profile of SSR as a function of one flux, while the values for the remaining fluxes are optimized. The 68% and 95% confidence intervals of an evaluated flux correspond to flux values that increased SSR by less than 1.00 and 3.84, respectively [41].
Abbreviations
 BV:

EMU basis vectors
 ^{13}CMFA:

^{13}Cmetabolic flux analysis
 EMU:

Elementary metabolite unit
 Gluc:

Glucose
 Gln:

Glutamine
 MDH:

Malate dehydrogenase
 MID:

Mass isotopomer distribution
 MS:

Mass spectrometry
 oxPPP:

Oxidative pentose phosphate pathway
 PC:

Pyruvate carboxylase
 PYC:

PCexpressing cells
 TA:

Transaldolase
 TK:

Transketolase
 WT:

Wildtype cells.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NSF CAREER Award (CBET1054120) to MRA and the NSF Graduate Fellowship to SBC.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Sauer U: Metabolic networks in motion: ^{ 13 }Cbased flux analysis. Mol Syst Biol 2006, 2: 62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zamboni N, Fendt SM, Ruhl M, Sauer U: (13)Cbased metabolic flux analysis. Nat Protoc 2009,4(6):878892. 10.1038/nprot.2009.58View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Stephanopoulos G: Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 1999,1(1):111. 10.1006/mben.1998.0101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Crown SB, Indurthi DC, Ahn WS, Choi J, Papoutsakis ET, Antoniewicz MR: Resolving the TCA cycle and pentosephosphate pathway of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824: Isotopomer analysis, in vitro activities and expression analysis. Biotechnol J 2011,6(3):300305. 10.1002/biot.201000282View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Reed JL, Senger RS, Antoniewicz MR, Young JD: Computational approaches in metabolic engineering. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010, 2010: 207414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Szyperski T: Biosynthetically directed fractional ^{ 13 }Clabeling of proteinogenic amino acids, An efficient analytical tool to investigate intermediary metabolism. Eur J Biochem 1995,232(2):433448. 10.1111/j.14321033.1995.tb20829.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Antoniewicz MR, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G: Accurate assessment of amino acid mass isotopomer distributions for metabolic flux analysis. Anal Chem 2007,79(19):75547559. 10.1021/ac0708893View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wittmann C: Metabolic flux analysis using mass spectrometry. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2002, 74: 3964.Google Scholar
 Antoniewicz MR, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G: Measuring deuterium enrichment of glucose hydrogen atoms by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2011, 83: 32113216. 10.1021/ac200012pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Choi J, Antoniewicz MR: Tandem mass spectrometry: A novel approach for metabolic flux analysis. Metab Eng 2011, 13: 225233. 10.1016/j.ymben.2010.11.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Jeffrey FM, Roach JS, Storey CJ, Sherry AD, Malloy CR: ^{ 13 }C isotopomer analysis of glutamate by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 2002,300(2):192205. 10.1006/abio.2001.5457View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wiechert W, Mollney M, Petersen S, de Graaf AA: A universal framework for ^{ 13 }C metabolic flux analysis. Metab Eng 2001,3(3):265283. 10.1006/mben.2001.0188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Antoniewicz MR, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G: Elementary metabolite units (EMU): a novel framework for modeling isotopic distributions. Metab Eng 2007,9(1):6886. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.09.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Leighty RW, Antoniewicz MR: Dynamic metabolic flux analysis (DMFA): A framework for determining fluxes at metabolic nonsteady state. Metab Eng 2011,13(6):745755. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ahn WS, Antoniewicz MR: Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cells at growth and nongrowth phases using isotopic tracers and mass spectrometry. Metab Eng 2011,13(5):598609. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.07.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Boghigian BA, Seth G, Kiss R, Pfeifer BA: Metabolic flux analysis and pharmaceutical production. Metab Eng 2010,12(2):8195. 10.1016/j.ymben.2009.10.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Metallo CM, Walther JL, Stephanopoulos G: Evaluation of 13C isotopic tracers for metabolic flux analysis in mammalian cells. J Biotechnol 2009,144(3):167174. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.07.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Niklas J, Heinzle E: Metabolic Flux Analysis in Systems Biology of Mammalian Cells. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2011, 127: 109132.Google Scholar
 Niklas J, Schneider K, Heinzle E: Metabolic flux analysis in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2010,21(1):6369. 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.01.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Quek LE, Dietmair S, Kromer JO, Nielsen LK: Metabolic flux analysis in mammalian cell culture. Metab Eng 2010,12(2):161171. 10.1016/j.ymben.2009.09.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Noguchi Y, Young JD, Aleman JO, Hansen ME, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G: Effect of anaplerotic fluxes and amino acid availability on hepatic lipoapoptosis. J Biol Chem 2009,284(48):3342533436. 10.1074/jbc.M109.049478View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Yoo H, Antoniewicz MR, Stephanopoulos G, Kelleher JK: Quantifying reductive carboxylation flux of glutamine to lipid in a brown adipocyte cell line. J Biol Chem 2008,283(30):2062120627. 10.1074/jbc.M706494200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Burgess SC, He T, Yan Z, Lindner J, Sherry AD, Malloy CR, Browning JD, Magnuson MA: Cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase does not solely control the rate of hepatic gluconeogenesis in the intact mouse liver. Cell Metab 2007,5(4):313320. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Burgess SC, Hausler N, Merritt M, Jeffrey FM, Storey C, Milde A, Koshy S, Lindner J, Magnuson MA, Malloy CR, et al., et al.: Impaired tricarboxylic acid cycle activity in mouse livers lacking cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase. J Biol Chem 2004,279(47):4894148949. 10.1074/jbc.M407120200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Previs SF, Brunengraber H: Methods for measuring gluconeogenesis in vivo. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 1998,1(5):461465. 10.1097/0007519719980900000016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Noguchi Y, Nishikata N, Shikata N, Kimura Y, Aleman JO, Young JD, Koyama N, Kelleher JK, Takahashi M, Stephanopoulos G: Ketogenic essential amino acids modulate lipid synthetic pathways and prevent hepatic steatosis in mice. PLoS One ,5(8):e12057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Walther JL, Metallo CM, Zhang J, Stephanopoulos G: Optimization of 13C isotopic tracers for metabolic flux analysis in mammalian cells. Metab Eng 14(2):162171.
 Antoniewicz MR, Kraynie DF, Laffend LA, GonzalezLergier J, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G: Metabolic flux analysis in a nonstationary system: fedbatch fermentation of a high yielding strain of E. coli producing 1,3propanediol. Metab Eng 2007,9(3)):277292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sengupta N, Rose ST, Morgan JA: Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cell metabolism in the late nongrowth phase. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011,108(1):8292. 10.1002/bit.22890View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Noh K, Wahl A, Wiechert W: Computational tools for isotopically instationary ^{ 13 }C labeling experiments under metabolic steady state conditions. Metab Eng 2006,8(6):554577. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.05.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Henry O, Durocher Y: Enhanced glycoprotein production in HEK293 cells expressing pyruvate carboxylase. Metab Eng 2011,13(5):499507. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.05.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Yang TH, Wittmann C, Heinzle E: Respirometric ^{ 13 }C flux analysis, Part I: design, construction and validation of a novel multiple reactor system using online membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Metab Eng 2006,8(5):417431. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.03.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Crown SB, Antoniewicz MR: Selection of tracers for ^{ 13 }Cmetabolic flux analysis using elementary metabolite units (EMU) basis vector methodology. Metab Eng 2012,14(2):150161. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.12.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ahn WS, Antoniewicz MR: Towards dynamic metabolic flux analysis in CHO cell cultures. Biotechnol J 2012,7(1):6174. 10.1002/biot.201100052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Schellenberger J, Zielinski DC, Choi W, Madireddi S, Portnoy V, Scott DA, Reed JL, Osterman AL, Palsson BO: Predicting outcomes of steadystate ^{ 13 }C isotope tracing experiments with Monte Carlo sampling. BMC Syst Biol 2012,6(1):9. 10.1186/1752050969View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Mollney M, Wiechert W, Kownatzki D, de Graaf AA: Bidirectional reaction steps in metabolic networks: IV. Optimal design of isotopomer labeling experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999,66(2)):86103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Yang TH, Heinzle E, Wittmann C: Theoretical aspects of ^{ 13 }C metabolic flux analysis with sole quantification of carbon dioxide labeling. Comput Biol Chem 2005,29(2):121133. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2005.02.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Noh K, Wiechert W: Experimental design principles for isotopically instationary ^{ 13 }C labeling experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006,94(2):234251. 10.1002/bit.20803View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wahrheit J, Nicolae A, Heinzle E: Eukaryotic metabolism: measuring compartment fluxes. Biotechnol J 2011,6(9):10711085. 10.1002/biot.201100032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Young JD, Walther JL, Antoniewicz MR, Yoo H, Stephanopoulos G: An elementary metabolite unit (EMU) based method of isotopically nonstationary flux analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008,99(3):686699. 10.1002/bit.21632View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Antoniewicz MR, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G: Determination of confidence intervals of metabolic fluxes estimated from stable isotope measurements. Metab Eng 2006,8(4):324337. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.01.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.