Table 3 Overlapping of the top 100 ranked list in any two scoring methods.
From: cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome
| Â | Local-based | Global-based | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | MCC | DMNC | MNC | Degree | EPC | BottleNeck | EcCentricity | Closeness | Radiality | Betweenness |
DMNC | 30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
MNC | 28% | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Degree | 17% | 0% | 69% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EPC | 8% | 0% | 60% | 69% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
BottleNeck | 8% | 0% | 35% | 53% | 33% | - | - | - | - | - |
EcCentricity | 4% | 0% | 13% | 21% | 21% | 23% | - | - | - | - |
Closeness | 10% | 0% | 63% | 76% | 77% | 44% | 29% | - | - | - |
Radiality | 10% | 0% | 64% | 76% | 77% | 43% | 30% | 99% | - | - |
Betweenness | 14% | 0% | 56% | 76% | 54% | 60% | 26% | 68% | 67% | - |
Stress | 11% | 0% | 61% | 88% | 71% | 55% | 25% | 77% | 76% | 82% |