Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison for 5-way network alignment.

From: Accurate multiple network alignment through context-sensitive random walk

  DMC DMR CG
  CN SPE MNE CN SPE MNE CN SPE MNE
Proposed 7,536.7 0.940 0.047 7,410.3 0.934 0.053 7,177.6 0.919 0.060
SMETANA 7,273.2 0.912 0.069 7,181.8 0.915 0.068 7,331.6 0.935 0.048
BEAMS 6,842.2 0.863 0.104 6,882 0.873 0.096 7,376.5 0.921 0.062
NetCoffee 6,431.2 0.894 0.090 6,395.7 0.890 0.093 6,150.2 0.854 0.120
IsoRankN 5,559 0.920 0.147 5,462.3 0.793 0.162 5,688.4 0.828 0.132
Proposed (all 5 species) 4476.9 0.931 0.048 4017.9 0.916 0.060 3644.8 0.900 0.068
SMETANA (all 5 species) 4062.3 0.891 0.077 3704.9 0.889 0.080 3778.9 0.922 0.052
BEAMS (all 5 species) 2858.4 0.814 0.121 3095.2 0.838 0.104 3510.3 0.918 0.052
NetCoffee (all 5 species) 2960.4 0.867 0.106 2973.3 0.855 0.113 2841.2 0.796 0.156
IsoRankN (all 5 species) 1668.1 0.728 0.179 1595.4 0.677 0.215 2233.5 0.742 0.168