Table 2 Performance comparison for 5-way network alignment.

Proposed

7,536.7

0.940

0.047

7,410.3

0.934

0.053

7,177.6

0.919

0.060

SMETANA

7,273.2

0.912

0.069

7,181.8

0.915

0.068

7,331.6

0.935

0.048

BEAMS

6,842.2

0.863

0.104

6,882

0.873

0.096

7,376.5

0.921

0.062

NetCoffee

6,431.2

0.894

0.090

6,395.7

0.890

0.093

6,150.2

0.854

0.120

IsoRankN

5,559

0.920

0.147

5,462.3

0.793

0.162

5,688.4

0.828

0.132

Proposed (all 5 species)

4476.9

0.931

0.048

4017.9

0.916

0.060

3644.8

0.900

0.068

SMETANA (all 5 species)

4062.3

0.891

0.077

3704.9

0.889

0.080

3778.9

0.922

0.052

BEAMS (all 5 species)

2858.4

0.814

0.121

3095.2

0.838

0.104

3510.3

0.918

0.052

NetCoffee (all 5 species)

2960.4

0.867

0.106

2973.3

0.855

0.113

2841.2

0.796

0.156

IsoRankN (all 5 species)

1668.1

0.728

0.179

1595.4

0.677

0.215

2233.5

0.742

0.168