Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance of MI and TE-based methods of GRN inference, presented as the mean AUC (and standard deviation) across a variety of random [46], small-world [47] and scale-free [48] networks from the Mendes ‘Century’ and ‘Jumbo’ collections [42]

From: Information theoretic approaches for inference of biological networks from continuous-valued data

Collection

Networks

Nodes

Edges

Topology

AUC (Mutual Information)

AUC (Transfer Entropy)

     

Kernel (ARACNE [30])

KSG

Kernel

KSG

CenturyRND

50

100

200

Random

0.514

0.478

0.589

0.603

     

(0.030)

(0.028)

(0.024)

(0.027)

CenturySF

50

100

200

Scale-free

0.475

0.505

0.526

0.561

     

(0.036)

(0.033)

(0.030)

(0.030)

CenturySW

50

100

200

Small-world

0.477

0.471

0.602

0.598

     

(0.035)

(0.035)

(0.028)

(0.030)

JumboRND

5

1000

1000

Random

0.473

0.439

0.540

0.564

     

(0.014)

(0.013)

(0.006)

(0.009)

JumboSF

5

1000

1000

Scale-free

0.526

0.577

0.606

0.649

     

(0.007)

(0.010)

(0.007)

(0.012)

  1. Kernel-based methods apply the uniform kernel (see (2)) with bandwidth h=0.1. For KSG-based methods, KSG algorithm 1 (better suited to small networks, see (3)) was applied to ‘Century’ data and algorithm 2 (see (4)) to ‘Jumbo’ data, both with K=4 [33] and assuming length-1 Markovian processes. Gene expression time-series were simulated until convergence (d x/d t=0) using Gepasi with default parameters [45]