Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Systems Biology

Fig. 3

From: Network topology of NaV1.7 mutations in sodium channel-related painful disorders

Fig. 3

Topological parameter profiles of NaV1.7 gain-of-function mutations and nABN and hSNPs. a The upper panel shows the B ct profile of gain-of-function mutation; the lower panel show the B ct profile of nABN and hSNPs. Squares indicates B ct values of WT amino acids, circles indicate B ct values of mutated amino acids. The graphs highlight that the difference between B ct value of mutated amino acids and B ct value of WT amino acids is higher in the cohort of gain-of-function (GF) mutations (upper panel) compared to control (Ctrl) nABN and hSNPs (lower panel). B ct values are multipled by 100. b The box plot shows the |ΔB ct | difference between gain-of-function mutations and the cohort of nABN and hSNP variants (mean gain-of-function |∆B ct | = 1.14 ± 1.40; nABN and hSNP ∆B ct  = 0.19 ± 0.28; ***p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon signed-ranked test). |∆B ct | values are multipled by 100; dark horizontal lines and the triangular symbol represent median and mean values respectively, with the box representing the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the dots the outliers. c The upper panel shows the Degree (D) profile of gain-of-function mutations; the lower panel show the D profile of nABN and hSNPs. Squares indicates D values of WT amino acids, circles indicate D values of mutated amino acids. The box plot shows the |ΔD| difference between gain-of-function (GF) mutations and the cohort of nABN and hSNP (Ctrl) variants (gain-of-function mean |∆D| = 4.3 ± 5.15; nABN and hSNP |∆D| = 2.37 ± 2.10; p > 0.05 by Wilcoxon signed-ranked test); dark horizontal lines and the triangular symbol represent median and mean values respectively, with the box representing the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the dots the outliers. d The upper panel shows the Clustering Coefficient (CC) profile of gain-of-function mutations; the lower panel show the CC profile of nABN and hSNPs. Squares indicates CC values of WT amino acids; circles indicate CC values of mutated amino acids. The box plot shows the |ΔCC ct | difference between gain-of-function (GF) mutations and the cohort of nABN and hSNP (Ctrl) variants (mean gain-of-function |∆CC ct | = 0.15 ± 0.20; nABN and hSNP |∆CC ct | = 0.20 ± 0.25; p > 0.05 by Wilcoxon signed-ranked test); dark horizontal lines and the triangular symbol represent median and mean values respectively, with the box representing the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the dots the outliers. e The upper panel shows the Closeness (Cct) profile of gain-of-function mutations; the lower panel show the Cct profile of nABN and hSNPs. Squares indicates Cct values of WT amino acids, circles indicate Cct values of mutated amino acids. The box plot shows the ΔC ct difference between gain-of-function (GF) mutations and the cohort of nABN and hSNP (Ctrl) variants (mean gain-of-function |∆C ct | = 0.6 ± 0.9; nABN and hSNP |∆C ct | = 0.7 ± 1.4; p > 0.05 by Wilcoxon signed-ranked test). C ct and ∆C ct values are multipled by 100; dark horizontal lines and the triangular symbol represent median and mean values respectively, with the box representing the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the dots the outliers. f The upper panel shows the Eccentricity (Ect) profile of gain-of-function mutations; the lower panel show the Ect profile of nABN and hSNPs. Squares indicates Ect values of WT amino acids, circles indicate Ect values of mutated amino acids. The box plot shows the |ΔE ct | difference between gain-of-function (GF) mutations and the cohort of nABN and hSNP (Ctrl) variants (mean gain-of-function |∆E ct | = 1.53 ± 3.75; nABN and hSNP |∆E ct | = 2.05 ± 4.62; p > 0.05 by Wilcoxon signed-ranked test); dark horizontal lines and the triangular symbol represent median and mean values respectively, with the box representing the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the dots the outliers

Back to article page