 Research article
 Open Access
 Published:
Detection of driver metabolites in the human liver metabolic network using structural controllability analysis
BMC Systems Biology volume 8, Article number: 51 (2014)
Abstract
Background
Abnormal states in human liver metabolism are major causes of human liver diseases ranging from hepatitis to hepatic tumor. The accumulation in relevant data makes it feasible to derive a largescale human liver metabolic network (HLMN) and to discover important biological principles or drugtargets based on network analysis. Some studies have shown that interesting biological phenomenon and drugtargets could be discovered by applying structural controllability analysis (which is a newly prevailed concept in networks) to biological networks. The exploration on the connections between structural controllability theory and the HLMN could be used to uncover valuable information on the human liver metabolism from a fresh perspective.
Results
We applied structural controllability analysis to the HLMN and detected driver metabolites. The driver metabolites tend to have strong ability to influence the states of other metabolites and weak susceptibility to be influenced by the states of others. In addition, the metabolites were classified into three classes: critical, highfrequency and lowfrequency driver metabolites. Among the identified 36 critical driver metabolites, 27 metabolites were found to be essential; the highfrequency driver metabolites tend to participate in different metabolic pathways, which are important in regulating the whole metabolic systems. Moreover, we explored some other possible connections between the structural controllability theory and the HLMN, and find that transport reactions and the environment play important roles in the human liver metabolism.
Conclusion
There are interesting connections between the structural controllability theory and the human liver metabolism: driver metabolites have essential biological functions; the crucial role of extracellular metabolites and transport reactions in controlling the HLMN highlights the importance of the environment in the health of human liver metabolism.
Background
Metabolism is one of the most complex cellular processes and a basal system for maintaining life of all organisms. Liver metabolism disorders could cause a wide range of diseases, ranging from hepatitis to hepatic tumor[1]. Many studies which focus on the roles of single molecule substances or single paths in regulating liver metabolism have been carried out. For example, the interleukin receptorassociated kinaseM (IRAKM) has been found to negatively regulate the innate and the adaptive immune response in the liver reacting to acute insult by alcohol[2]; the liver X receptors (LXRs) could bind to cholesterol metabolites and regulate the cholesterol turnover[3]; the metabolic changes in the glucose metabolism and the TCA cycle in liver have been found to be related to diabetes progression[4]. While an understanding of single molecules continues to be important, the focus is on understanding the whole metabolic network at a systemslevel. Because a metabolic system is not just an assembly of metabolites, its properties cannot be fully understood merely by studying the single molecules[5].
With the accumulation of the relevant data, it becomes feasible to study metabolic systems in a genomescale. A human metabolic model has been reconstructed based on genomic and bibliomic data[6]. The reconstructed genomescale human metabolic model has been used to study human physiology and pathology[7]. Based on the human metabolic model[6] and a variety of different tissuespecific data, a human liver metabolic model has been derived[8]. For the method for the reconstruction and analysis of metabolic models, flux balance analysis (FBA) is a mathematical approach for analyzing the flow of metabolites through a metabolic network[9], which is widely used in predicting the rate of production of a biotechnologically important metabolite. When using FBA, the constructed models must satisfy the following requirements: models without gaps, electron balanced, mass balanced, etc. While for metabolic models created by some algorithms, such as INIT[10], they may not satisfy all the requirements. Even if the dissatisfaction exist, studies on these models could uncover novel valuable information on metabolic systems based on network analysis[11, 12]. Thus, it is rewarding to study the metabolic systems from the perspective of networks.
Network science is an emerging field concerned with the study of complex systems represented as networks[13], which has become a powerful conceptual paradigm in the field of biology to understand biological systems at a systemslevel[14, 15]. In network science, how to control a system is a central issue[16]. Due to the unknown architecture of a system and the dynamical rules that capture the interactions between the components, it is difficult to control the complex system[16, 17]. By fixing the weights of interactions between the components to be either 0 or free parameters, the structural controllability was defined and studied to show some connections between the control theory and network[18, 19]. Liu et al. have used the theory of structural controllability to many models of real networks[16, 17], and proved that by giving control signals to a minimum set of nodes (such nodes are called driver nodes), the whole network can be guided to any desired final state in finite time. Recently, structural controllability analysis has been applied to some biological networks, where interesting properties on the biological system and drugtargets have been discovered[12, 20]. It is fair to expect that there are some possible connections between the structural controllability theory and the human liver metabolic network, which could provide valuable information on the human liver metabolism, such as the discovery of essential metabolites.
Abnormal states of the human liver metabolic network could lead to different metabolic diseases, such as diabetes[21], obesity[22] and cancers[23]. Sometimes, these abnormal states can be steered into normal states by different appropriate inputs: drugs, signals from environment or inside the organism, the injection of specific metabolites. Theses control inputs could lead to the changes in metabolic states (the concentration of metabolites) which influence the metabolic functions. For example, the drug raltitrexed can be used in cancer chemotherapy by targeting at the metabolite thymidylate synthase[24]; the injection of potassium can make the body functioning normal when the body suffers from the metabolic disorder of hypokalemia. If an organism suffers from metabolic disorders and the metabolic network cannot be controlled with any control inputs (drugs, signals from environment or inside the organism, etc.), then the organism may develop cancer or apoptosis. Researches on the controllability of the human liver metabolic network could provide the basis for ultimately understanding liver disease mechanisms, facilitating the development of therapeutics optimized for efficacy.
In this work, we applied the structural controllability analysis to the HLMN, detecting the metabolites and reactions that play important roles in the controllability of the HLMN. We identified driver metabolites in the HLMN, and classified the metabolites into three classes: critical, highfrequency and lowfrequency driver metabolites. Among the 36 critical driver metabolites, 27 metabolites are essential, which suggests that the critical driver metabolites play important roles in the human liver metabolism. We find that the highfrequency driver metabolites tend to participate in different metabolic pathways, which are important in regulating the whole metabolic systems. The critical and highfrequency driver metabolites may be potential drugtargets. Moreover, we explored the other possible connections between the structural controllability theory and the HLMN. For example, by analyzing the roles of different links of the HLMN in the robustness of controllability, we find that transport reactions and the environment are important in the human liver metabolism. The results in this work show some connections between the structural controllability analysis and the human liver metabolism, which uncover valuable information on the human liver metabolism from a fresh perspective.
Results and discussion
Description of the human liver metabolic network
We used a human liver metabolic model represented by a set of metabolic reactions[8], which contains 1360 metabolites and 1826 reactions. The human metabolic model was generated based on MBA algorithm[8], which is a modelbuilding algorithm used to derive tissuespecific metabolic models from a generic model[6] by integrating a variety of tissuespecific molecular data sources, including literaturebased knowledge, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic and phenotypic data. In the human liver metabolic model, each metabolite is represented in the form of A[x], where A is the name of a metabolite and x in the bracket [ ] is the abbreviation of the cell compartment where the metabolite A appears (see Additional file1). Metabolite A may appear in different cell compartments x,…,y, so there are A[x],…,A[y] for the same metabolite but different cell compartments, which are counted as different metabolites.
Based on the principle that a set of metabolic reactions can be translated into a network representation[25], we reformulated the liver model in the following way: denoting each metabolite by a node labeled with A[x], and connecting two nodes by A[x] → B[y] if there is a chemical reaction where A[x] is a substrate and B[y] is a product. The derived HLMN contains 1360 nodes and 6501 links (see Additional file1). In order to illustrate the process of reformulating the HLMN, an example with three metabolic reactions is given in Figure1.
For convenience and without ambiguity, we will not distinguish nodes from metabolites hereinafter when refer to the properties of the HLMN. For example, when we say a driver node in the HLMN, we may mean a driver metabolite in the HLMN.
Classification and analysis of driver metabolites
Driver metabolites in the HLMN are metabolites where inputs are injected. If the driver metabolites in a minimum driver metabolites set (MDMS, for short) are all controlled by different inputs, the HLMN can be steered from any given state to a desired state in finite time. "Minimum" means that if signals are only input on a proper subset of S, then the HLMN cannot be guided to some final desired states in finite time. MDMSs are determined by detecting maximum matchings in the HLMN (see Methods).
A maximum matching is a maximum set of links that do not share start or end nodes[16]. There are different maximum matchings in a network[26], which could result in different MDMSs in the HLMN. Counting the number of all maximum matchings in an arbitrary network has been proven to belong to the ♯Pcomplete (sharp Pcomplete) class of problems[27]. There is no currently known polynomialtime algorithm for solving a ♯Pcomplete problem. The number of maximum matchings can grow exponentially with networks size, hence a network with only hundreds of nodes often leads to millions of maximum matchings. Enumeration of maximum matchings is computationally prohibitive for large networks[28]. Thus, the enumeration of maximum matchings in the HLMN (containing 1360 nodes) is hard to achieve.
Classification of driver metabolites
We randomly identified 5000 different maximum matchings (see Additional file2) and their corresponding MDMSs (see Methods). In the HLMN, a node may appear in different MDMSs. For each node v, we counted the number of MDMSs that the node v appears in and then normalized the number (that is, the number is divided by 5000). The normalized values characterize the frequency f _{ d } of each node appearing in the 5000 MDMSs. According to the frequency of each node, we classified the metabolites into three groups: critical driver metabolites with f _{ d } = 1, highfrequency driver metabolites with 0.6 ≤ f _{ d } < 1, lowfrequency driver metabolites with 0 ≤ f _{ d } < 0.6.
A node with f _{ d } = 1 means that the node appears in all the MDMSs. Such nodes may possess some specific properties or functions, which could provide valuable information on the HLMN. So we classified the nodes with f _{ d } = 1 being critical driver nodes. The reason why we chose the threshold 0.6 to separate highfrequency driver metabolites from lowfrequency driver metabolites, is that we would like to make the difference between the roles of metabolites in these two groups as big as possible (for detailed analysis, see the subsection "The roles of the highfrequency driver metabolites").
In order to test whether the classification of metabolites based on 5000 MDMSs is reliable, we computed the frequencies of metabolites in 51 different families of MDMSs with sizes of 5000,5100,5200,…,10000. The frequency of each metabolite computed based on different families of MDMSs stays in a same region, where the regions are f _{ d } = 1, 0.6 ≤ f _{ d } < 1 and 0 ≤ f _{ d } < 0.6 (see Additional file3). In other words, the classifications of each metabolite are the same based on these different families. Hence the classification of metabolites based on 5000 MDMSs is reliable. Furthermore, we have employed an unbiased random sampling method[28] to validate the results based on the 5000 MDMSs (for detailed analysis, see the subsection "Validation for the classification and the properties of driver metabolites").
Topological analysis of driver metabolites in the HLMN
We computed different centralities of each metabolite i in the HLMN, which include outdegree OutD, indegree InD, degree D, betweenness BC, closeness CC, incloseness CCI and outcloseness CCO (for definitions, see Methods). The frequency f _{ d } was found to decrease quickly with the indegree (see Additional file4) while this pattern does not hold for other centralities, which is consistent with the result in[28]. For each centrality, all metabolites in the HLMN are divided into three sets of similar sizes, based on their centrality scores (low, medium, and high), In this way, seven families of sets were obtained:${\mathcal{F}}_{D}=\{{D}_{l},{D}_{m},{D}_{h}\}$,${\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{OutD}}}=\{{\mathit{\text{OutD}}}_{l},{\mathit{\text{OutD}}}_{m},{\mathit{\text{OutD}}}_{h}\}$,${\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{InD}}}=\{{\mathit{\text{InD}}}_{l},{\mathit{\text{InD}}}_{m},{\mathit{\text{InD}}}_{h}\}$,${\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{BC}}}=\{{\mathit{\text{BC}}}_{l},{\mathit{\text{BC}}}_{m},{\mathit{\text{BC}}}_{h}\}$,${\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{CC}}}=\{{\mathit{\text{CC}}}_{l},{\mathit{\text{CC}}}_{m},{\mathit{\text{CC}}}_{h}\}$,${\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{CCI}}}=\{{\mathit{\text{CCI}}}_{l},{\mathit{\text{CCI}}}_{m},{\mathit{\text{CCI}}}_{h}\}$,${\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{CCO}}}=\{{\mathit{\text{CCO}}}_{l},{\mathit{\text{CCO}}}_{m},{\mathit{\text{CCO}}}_{h}\}$, where each family contains three sets, and the subscripts l,m,h respectively represent low, medium and high.
We used set A to denote the union of metabolites from the 5000 MDMSs, and set B to denote the union set of the critical and highfrequency driver metabolites. For each of the families${\mathcal{F}}_{D},{\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{OutD}}},{\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{InD}}},{\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{BC}}},{\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{CC}}},{\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{CCI}}},{\mathcal{F}}_{\mathit{\text{CCO}}}$, the fractions of metabolites from set A that belong to the three sets in the family were computed (see Figure2(A)), and the fractions of metabolites from set B that belong to the three sets in the family were also computed (see Figure2(B)). For example, for the family${\mathcal{F}}_{D}$, we computed A ∩ D _{ l }/A, A ∩ D _{ m }/A, A ∩ D _{ h }/A, and B ∩ D _{ l }/B, B ∩ D _{ m }/B, B ∩ D _{ h }/B, where ∗ denotes the size of set ∗.
Comparing the results shown in Figure2(A) and Figure2(B), we find that for each centrality, the difference between the fractions computed in set B is greater than that in set A, which means that the topological characteristic differences are bigger in the set of critical and highfrequency driver metabolites. Indegree and incloseness measure the susceptibility of a metabolite to be influenced by other metabolites. Higher indegree and higher incloseness imply that the metabolite could be more easily influenced by others. Outcloseness measures the ability of a metabolite to influence other metabolites. Higher outcloseness implies that the metabolite could influence others more easily. The metabolites in set B tend to have low indegree, low incloseness, and high outcloseness. Therefore, the driver metabolites, especially the critical and highfrequency driver metabolites, tend to have strong ability to influence the states of other metabolites and weak susceptibility to be influenced by the states of other metabolites. Moreover, injecting control inputs (drugs, signals from environment or inside the organism, etc.) to critical and highfrequency driver metabolites could regulate the whole state of the HLMN, which indicates that the critical and highfrequency driver metabolites may be potential drugtargets.
For each centrality, we used chisquare test (see Methods) to establish whether or not the fraction distribution in set A and set B differs from that in the whole network (the reason why we chose chisquare test is given in Methods). The chisquare statistic values for each centrality in set A and set B are shown in Table1. While the table value for chisquare statistic is 5.99, based on the freedom being 2 and the level of significance being 0.05. Except for the CCO, other chisquare statistic values are greater than the table value in set A, and the chisquare statistic values for all the centralities are greater than the table value in set B. It means that except for the CCO in set A, for other centralities in set A and all the centralities in set B, the fraction distributions differ from that in the whole network. Thus, the result of the topological features of driver metabolites is of statistical significance.
Properties of the critical driver metabolites
In the HLMN, we detected 36 critical driver metabolites (see Table2). Their indegrees are all zero, which is consistent with the result in[29] and means that the 36 critical driver metabolites are all the start metabolites of paths (paths in the HLMN are sequential reactions between metabolites). By Lin’s structural controllability theorem[18, 30], if a system is controllable, there is no inaccessible nodes (i.e., nodes that cannot be accessed or "influenced" by the external inputs). Since these start metabolites cannot be influenced by the external inputs via other metabolites, they need to be directly controlled by external inputs.
The 36 critical driver metabolites are all found to be extracellular (each of the 36 critical driver metabolites is associated with the abbreviation of compartmental information "[e]", which means extracellular). By checking the biochemistry activities of the 36 critical driver metabolites, we find that they all participate in the transport reactions from the extracellular into the cell, which suggests that the intakes of these extracellular metabolites play important roles in the biological activities of the liver cells. For example, appropriately increasing the intake of the critical driver metabolite gammatocopherol could help lower the cholesterol level, and increasing the intake of the critical driver metabolite alphatocopherol could decrease lipid peroxidation and hepatic stellate cells activation, which could protect liver cells and prevent liver fibrosis[51].
We investigated the biological essentiality of the 36 critical driver metabolites. The essentiality of a metabolite measures how important the metabolite is in the whole metabolic systems or some metabolic processes. Although a metabolite could exist in different compartments, the metabolite is recognized to be essential as long as it is found to be essential in any one of the compartments[33]. Based on the different essentiality of metabolites, the metabolites were classified into three groups:

Universal Metabolites (UM): Some inorganic or cofactor metabolites, such as CMP and ATP, which have been found to exist universally in more than 90% organisms. The universal metabolites are usually treated as essential metabolites because most living matter cannot survive without them[33, 52].

Functional Essential Metabolites (FEM): The metabolites which are not UM and have essential roles in some biological functions. For example, folate is essential to numerous bodily functions, and required by the human body to synthesize, repair and methylate DNA as well as to act as a cofactor in certain biological reactions[31]; Hyaluronan is essential for embryogenesis[37]; Human body requires pantothenic acid to synthesize coenzymeA (CoA), as well as to synthesize and metabolize proteins, carbohydrates, and fats[44].

Essentiality Undiscovered Metabolites (EUM): The metabolites whose essentiality have not been discovered. These metabolites may be the potential essential metabolites, which demands further experimental verification.
Among the 36 critical driver metabolites, we find that 10 metabolites are UM; 17 metabolites are FEM; 9 metabolites are EUM. Therefore, among the 36 critical driver metabolites, 27 metabolites are essential, which suggests that the critical driver metabolites play important roles in human liver metabolism.
The roles of the highfrequency driver metabolites
We used simulated annealing (SA) algorithm[53] to detect modules in the HLMN. The reason why we chose the SA algorithm is that it is a commonly used technique to detect modules, and a benchmark to validate the effectiveness of the newly developed moduledetecting algorithms[54, 55]. Compared with other moduledetecting algorithms, such as the markov clustering method, the SA algorithm performs better in detecting modules in large scale metabolic networks and the detected modules are more biologically meaningful[56], since the SA algorithm is less sensitive to noise such as experimental error or incomplete data.
According to the two parameters withindegree and the partition coefficient of each node in the modularized HLMN, the nodes were divided into seven classes: R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 (for details, see Methods).
Since the SA algorithm is stochastic, different results of modularization could be obtained in different runs. We have run the SA algorithm for 100 times. Based on the result of each run, the nodes of the HLMN were classified into the seven classes R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7. Among the 100 classification results, the probability of each node being classified into each class is counted. As shown in Figure3, most nodes are always classified into a same class, which indicates that the role classification for the nodes in the HLMN based on the SA algorithm is reliable.
It has been found that the nonhubs connecting different modules are responsible for intermodule fluxes which influence the state of metabolic networks[57], while the nodes with high frequency f _{ d } have strong ability to influence the states of other metabolites, which prompts us to think whether the nodes with high frequency f _{ d } tend to be nonhubs connecting different modules. In the HLMN, more than 92% nodes are of roles R1 and R2, which are both nonhubs and R1 nodes have no connection with other modules while R2 nodes have connections with different modules. As shown in Figure4(A), with the frequency threshold f _{ dt } increasing, the fraction of R1 nodes among the set of nodes with f _{ dt } ≤ f _{ d } < 1 decreases while the fraction of R2 nodes increases. The fractions of nodes with different roles fluctuate when f _{ dt } ≥ 0.7 due to the small size of the set of nodes with f _{ dt } ≤ f _{ d } < 1. When f _{ dt } < 0.7, the difference between the fractions of R1 nodes and R2 nodes is the biggest at around f _{ dt } = 0.6. Therefore, we chose the threshold f _{ dt } = 0.6 to differentiate the highfrequency driver metabolites from the lowfrequency driver metabolites. The fact that the roles of highfrequency driver metabolites tend to be R2, indicates that the highfrequency driver metabolites tend to be nonhubs connecting different modules. Different modules could be mapped to different pathways[56], which means that the highfrequency driver metabolites tend to participate in different metabolic pathways. For example, the highfrequency driver metabolite cyclic adenosine monophosphate plays regulatory roles in glucose, protein and fatty metabolism pathways at the same time[58]. It suggests that the highfrequency driver metabolites play important roles in human liver metabolic network.
To validate that the result of the highfrequency driver metabolites does not depend on the module detecting method SA algorithm, we used another module detecting method fast greedy[59] to detect modules in the HLMN, and classify the nodes into 7 classes: R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7. With the frequency threshold f _{ dt } increasing, the fractions of R1 nodes and R2 nodes among the set of nodes with f _{ dt } ≤ f _{ d } < 1 show the similar pattern as that based on the SA algorithm, which is shown in Figure4(B). We arrived at the same conclusion that the highfrequency driver metabolites tend to be the nonhub connecting different modules.
Validation for the classification and the properties of driver metabolites
The results of the properties on the driver metabolites, critical driver metabolites and highfrequency driver metabolites are all based on the 5000 MDMSs. To validate that these results do not depend on the 5000 MDMSs, we applied an unbiased sampling method proposed by Jia et al.[28] to compute the frequency f _{ d } that each node acts as a driver node (see Additional file5).
Comparing with the results which based on the 5000 MDMSs, the set of critical driver nodes determined by this method is the same, while the set of highfrequency driver nodes determined by this method is not exactly the same, which may be caused by the randomness of sampling. However, the following result holds for both two methods: the highfrequency driver nodes tend to be the nonhubs connecting different modules. (see Additional file4). Moreover, the topological analysis has been applied to the set A (the set of the metabolites with f _{ d } > 0) and set B (the set of the metabolites with 1 ≤ f _{ d } > 0.6) detected by the method in[28]. The conclusion still holds that the driver metabolites, especially the critical and highfrequency driver metabolites, tend to have strong ability to influence the states of other metabolites and weak susceptibility to be influenced by the states of other metabolites (see Additional file4).
In conclusion, although the classification and analysis of driver metabolites are based on the 5000 MDMSs, the results on the properties of different driver metabolites do not rely on the 5000 MDMSs.
Alternative classification of driver nodes and the control mode of the HLMN
A recently published paper[29] has given an alternative classification of nodes based on their participation in control. A node is critical, itermittent or redundant if it acts as a driver node in all, some or none of the minimum sets of driver nodes. By measuring the fraction n _{ r } of the redundant nodes for a network with varying average degree, two distinct control modes were discovered in[29]. Based on the difference value of the fraction n _{ r } and${n}_{r}^{T}$ for its transpose network (whose wiring diagram is identical to the original network but the direction of each link is reversed), the control mode of a network can be identified: if$\mathrm{\Delta}{n}_{r}={n}_{r}{n}_{r}^{T}>0$ the network is centralized and if Δn _{ r } < 0 it is distributed.
We have applied the tools in[29] to the HLMN, and find that the control mode of the HLMN is distributed. While in[29], the control modes of the three involved metabolic networks cannot be identified, which is caused by the incompleteness of the metabolic networks, whose average degrees are in the ‘prebifurcation’ region (where no distinct control modes exist). With more information on these metabolic networks being uncovered, the average degrees increase and result in identifiable control modes. For example, the E. coli metabolic network[11] studied in[29] was assembled in 2000, and its control mode cannot be identified; however, when we applied the tools to the E. coli metabolic network iJO1366[60], which was assemble in 2011, we can find that the control mode of network iJO1366 is centralized. It is not easy to figure out the reason why the control mode of the human liver metabolic network is distributed and the E. coli metabolic network iJO1366 is centralized, due to the incompleteness of these two networks, whose control mode may alter with the increase of the network scale.
The role of reactions in the robustness of the controllability in the HLMN
Reaction failures could happen in metabolic systems, and different reaction failures have different impacts on the robustness of the metabolic function. Robustness characters the ability of metabolic systems to behavior normally under reaction failures. Some reaction failures would break the cellular homeostasis, resulting in an antiproliferative effect[61] or apoptosis[62], while some almostly have no influence on the cellular functions[63]. In what follows, we focus on the impacts of different reaction failures on the robustness (whether the network is controllable with the same MDMS under reaction failures) of the controllability in the HLMN.
Based on different impacts on the robustness of controllability caused by links absence, the links have been classified into three categories[16]: "critical" if its absence causes the minimum number of driver nodes increased so as to maintain full control; "redundant" if it can be removed without affecting the current set of driver nodes; "ordinary" if it is neither critical nor redundant. From the fractions of critical, ordinary and redundant links in the HLMN, which are shown in Figure5, we can find that few links are critical and most links are ordinary, whose absence may change the current set of driver nodes, but the network could still be controlled with the same number of driver nodes. In the human liver metabolism, there are only a few reactions represented by critical links, which provides an explanation to why human liver metabolism could function well under many different circumstances.
In the human liver metabolic model[8], the reactions have been classified into three classes: core high reactions for these reactions included in humancurated tissuespecific pathways, which are essential in the human liver metabolism; core moderate reactions for these reactions testified by molecule data; noncore reactions for the other, most of which are not associated with genes in the model and 50% are transport reactions. We computed the fractions of links representing the core high, core moderate and noncore reactions among the set of critical, ordinary and redundant links and the set of all links in the HLMN, which are shown in Figure5. Comparing with the fractions among the sets of the ordinary, redundant links and the whole link set in the HLMN, the fraction of links representing core high reactions are the lowest and the fraction of noncore reaction links are the highest in the set of critical links, which indicates that the reactions represented by critical links tend to be the noncore reactions.
Transport reactions transfer metabolites across compartments, many of them transfer metabolites from the environment into the cell. The fraction of transport reaction links among the set of critical links is 47.5%, while that among the whole link set in the HLMN is 20.8%. Moreover, we computed the fraction of links representing transport reactions which transfer metabolites from the environment into the cell among the set of critical links and that among the whole link set in the HLMN, which are 33.6% and 12.2%, respectively. These comparisons indicate that transport reactions and the environment are important in influencing the robustness of controllability of the HLMN. The metabolites carried in by transport reactions could activate a series metabolic reactions in human liver cells, which could change the state of the liver metabolism and influence the controllability of the HLMN.
Validation for the result that the reactions represented by critical links tend to be the noncore reactions
We used chisquare test (see Methods) to test whether or not the differences between the fractions of the core high, core moderate and noncore reaction links among the whole network and those among the set of critical links are out of chance. The observed data are the number of core high, core moderate and noncore reaction links among each of the sets of the critical links, which are 132, 59 and 226 respectively. The expected percentages are the fractions of corehigh, core moderate and noncore reaction links among the whole network, which are 60.14% and 14.55% and 25.3% respectively. The chisquare statistic value was computed based on the chisquare formula (see Methods), which is 193.9. With the freedom degree being 2 and the significance level being 0.05, the table value for chisquare statistic is 5.99. The chisquare statistic value is bigger than the table value, so there is a significant difference between the fractions among the set of critical links and those among the whole network, which means that the reactions represented by critical links tend to be the noncore reactions.
Conclusions
In this study, we have detected the driver metabolites in the HLMN and classified the metabolites into three classes: critical, highfrequency and lowfrequency driver metabolites. Among the 36 critical driver metabolites, 27 metabolites are essential, which suggests that the critical driver metabolites play important roles in the human liver metabolism. Moreover, the compartments where the critical driver metabolites appear are all extracellular. It is consistent with our knowledge that the substances imported from the environment play important roles in steering the behavior of the whole metabolic network. The liver metabolic system could be regulated by controlling the intakes of the critical driver metabolites. For example, the increase of the intake of the critical driver metabolite alphatocopherol could decrease lipid peroxidation and hepatic stellate cells activation, so as to protect liver cells and prevent liver fibrosis[51]. We find that the highfrequency driver metabolites tend to participate in different metabolic pathways, which are important in regulating the whole metabolic systems. For example, the highfrequency driver metabolite cyclic adenosine monophosphate, which acts as a second messenger in many biological processes, plays important regulatory roles in glucose, protein and fatty metabolism pathways at the same time[58]. In addition, the states of the critical and highfrequency driver metabolites have strong ability in steering the state of the whole HLMN, indicating that the critical and highfrequency driver metabolites may be potential drugtargets.
By analyzing the roles of different links in the robustness of controllability, we find that transport reactions and the environment are important in the robustness of controllability in the HLMN under reactions failures. The metabolites carried in by transport reactions could activate a series metabolic reactions in human liver cells, leading to changes in the state of liver metabolism.
Moreover, we have explored some other possible connections between the structural controllability theory and the HLMN. Based on the structural controllability theory, two key concepts control centrality[64] and control mode[29] have been proposed. The control centrality of a node measures the number of nodes that can be independently controlled by controlling this node alone. We attempted to reveal the possible connections between the control centrality and the actual importance of a metabolite in the HLMN, but we find there is no such connection (see Additional file4 and6). We also applied the tools in[29] to give an alternative node classification in the HLMN based on node’s participation in control, and find that the control mode of the HLMN is distributed. It is not easy to figure out the reason why the HLMN is distributed, due to the incompleteness of this network, whose control mode may alter with the increase of the network scale.
In summary, we find that the driver metabolites have essential biological functions, and the metabolites connecting different pathways play crucial roles in the controllability of the HLMN. The crucial role of extracellular metabolites and the transport reactions highlight the importance of the environment in the health of human liver metabolism. The work presented here raises a number of questions. For example, what properties do the lowfrequency driver metabolites have? How can we quantify the influence of each driver metabolite on the state of HLMN? Answers to these questions could further provide theoretical foundation for designing experiments of regulating the human liver metabolism.
Methods
Identification of driver metabolites
Driver metabolites are detected by finding the maximum matchings in the HLMN. Matching is a set of links, where the links do not share start or end nodes. A maximum matching is a matching with maximum size. A node is matched if there is a link in maximum matching pointing at it; otherwise, it is unmatched[16]. A network can be fully controlled if every unmatched node gets directly controlled and there are directed paths from input signals to all matched nodes[65]. An example to find maximum matchings and detect MDMSs is shown in Figure6.
The HLMN is denoted by network G = (X,R), where X is the set of metabolite nodes, and R is the set of reaction links. The network G = (X,R) can be transformed into a bipartite network G _{ p } = (X ^{+},X ^{},E), where each node X _{ i } is represented by two nodes${X}_{i}^{+}$ and${X}_{i}^{}$, and each link X _{ i } → X _{ j } is represented as an undirected link$({X}_{i}^{+},{X}_{j}^{})$[16, 66]. Given a matching M in G _{ p }, the links in M are matching links, and the others are free. The node which is not an endpoint of any matching link is called free node. Simple paths are the path whose links are alternately matching and free. Augmenting path is a simple path whose endpoints are both free nodes. If there is a augmenting path P, M ⊗ P is a matching, where ⊗ is the symmetric difference operation of two sets. The size of the matching M ⊗ P is greater than the size of M by one. A matching is maximum if there are no augmenting paths. We used the wellknown HopcroftKarp algorithm[67] to find maximum matchings in the bipartite network. For each maximum matching that we find, we can obtain a corresponding MDMS as illustrated in Figure6. The pseudocode of the algorithm to detect a MDMS is shown in Figure7. Different order of the link list could result in different initial matching set, which could further result in different maximum matching set. Thus, different MDMSs could be obtained. We compared every two of these MDMSs to make sure that the MDMSs are different from each other.
Measures of centrality
Betweenness centrality quantifies the number of times a node acts as a bridge along the shortest path between two other nodes. Betweenness of node v is defined as
where σ _{ st } is the number of shortest paths from node s to node t, and σ _{ st }(v) is the number of those paths that pass through v.
Outcloseness centrality of node v measures how fast it takes to spread information from v to other nodes. The outcloseness of node v is defined as
where d(v,i) is the length of shortest path from node v to node i.
Incloseness centrality of node v measures how fast it takes to receive information from other nodes. The incloseness of node v is defined as
where d(i,v) is the length of shortest path from node i and node v.
Closeness centrality of node v measures how fast it takes to exchange information between v and other nodes. The closeness of node v is defined as
where d _{ undire }(v,i) is the length of shortest path between node v and node i. Closeness centrality is defined in undirected networks. When we have to compute the closeness of node v in a directed network, the directed network is regarded as an undirected network.
Identification of modules
We divided the HLMN into modules by using the SA algorithm[53, 57]. Specifically, the implement tool "netcartow"[57] is used to detect modules by maximizing the modularity of the objective network. For a given decomposition of a network, the modularity M of this decomposition is defined as the gap between the fraction of links within modules and the expect fraction of links if the links are connected with no structure difference:
where N _{ M } is the number of modules, L is the number of links in the network, l _{ s } is the number of links between nodes in the module s, and d _{ s } is the sum of the degrees of the nodes in module s. By this definition, we can conclude that a good decomposition of a network must comprise many withinmodule links and as few as possible betweenmodule links. However, if we just try to minimize the number of betweenmodule links (equivalently, maximize the number of withinmodule links), the optimal partition consists of a single module and no betweenmodule links. Equation (5) addresses this difficulty by imposing that M = 0 if nodes are placed at random into modules or if all nodes are in the same module[57].
Let C = M, where M is the modularity as defined in equation (5). We used the SA algorithm to minimize the value of C. This is achieved by introducing a computational temperature T, which starts at a high value, and slowly decreasing T, each step of the SA algorithm attempts to replace the current solution by a random solution. When temperature T is high, the dependency between the previous and current solution is almost random, which could reduce the probability of being stuck at local optima. As temperature T goes to zero, the better solution is selected with an increasing probability. In this way, the SA algorithm gradually reaches a deep minima. Specifically, at each temperature T, we perform a number of random updates and accept them with probability:
where C _{ f } is the value of objective function after the update and C _{ i } is the value before the update. At each temperature T, we take n _{ i } = f S ^{2} individual node movements from one module to another and n _{ c } = f S collective movements which involve either merging two modules or splitting a splitting a module, where S is the number of metabolites in the network, and f is the iteration factor, which determines how many movements to perform at each temperature, we typically chose f = 1 as it was recommended in[57]. After the movements are evaluated at a certain T, the temperature T decreases to T ^{′} = c T, with c = 0.965, where c is the cooling factor, which determines the number of iterations. When temperature T reaches to 0, the algorithm stops.
Assignment of the roles of nodes
The roles of nodes are assigned based on two parameters: the withindegree and the partition coefficient. Nodes with similar roles are expected to have the similar withindegree and the similar partition coefficient. The withindegree z _{ i } measures how wellconnected node i is to other nodes in the same module, which is defined as
where k _{ i } is the number of links of metabolite i connecting to other metabolites in its module s _{ i },${\stackrel{\u0304}{k}}_{{s}_{i}}$ is the average of k over all metabolites in module s _{ i }, and${\sigma}_{{k}_{{s}_{i}}}$ is the standard deviation of k in s _{ i }.
The partition coefficient P _{ i } measures how welldistributes the links of node i are among different modules. The participation coefficient of a node is therefore close to 1 if its links are uniformly distributed among all the modules and 0 if all its links are within its own module. The partition coefficient P _{ i } is defined as
where k _{ is } is the number of links of node i to nodes in the module s, and k _{ i } is the total degree of node i.
According to the withinmodule degree z, the nodes with z ≥ 2.5 are classified as hubs and nodes with z < 2.5 are classified as nonhubs. Both hub and nonhub nodes are then more finely characterized by using the values of the participation coefficient. Nonhub nodes are divided into four classes:

(R1) nodes with all their links within their module (P ≤ 0.05);

(R2) nodes with some links to other modules (0.05 < P ≤ 0.62);

(R3) nodes with many links to other modules (0.62 < P ≤ 0.80);

(R4) nodes with links homogeneously distributed among all modules (P > 0.80).
The hub nodes are divided into three classes:

(R5) nodes with the vast majority of links within their module (P ≤ 0.30);

(R6) nodes with many links to most of the other modules (0.30 < P ≤ 0.75);

(R7) nodes with links homogeneously distributed among all modules (P > 0.75).
The thresholds above for classifying the nodes into different roles according to their position in the modularized network are suggested by[57]. These thresholds are heuristically determined and validated by studying the nodes of different roles in real metabolic networks.
Classification of links
The HLMN G = (X,R) can be transformed into a bipartite network G _{ p } = (X ^{+},X ^{},E), where X is the set of nodes, and R is the set of links, each node X _{ i } in set X is split into two nodes${X}_{i}^{+}$ and${X}_{i}^{}$ in set X ^{+} and set X ^{}, each link X _{ i } → X _{ j } in R is represented by an undirected link$({X}_{i}^{+},{X}_{j}^{})$ in E. Given a maximum matching M in G _{ p }, the links in M are called matching links, and others are called free links. The links in a simple path or a simple circle are alternately matching and free. Each link in G _{ p } belongs to a simple path or a simple circle.
All links in the HLMN have been classified into critical, ordinary or redundant according to their contribution to the robustness of controllability. The critical links appear in all the maximum matchings; the redundant links never appear in any maximum matching; and the ordinary links appear in some but not all maximum matchings.
Although the critical, ordinary and redundant links are defined based on all the maximum matchings, they can be determined based on their topological properties in the bipartite network with an arbitrary maximum matching. A proposition has been given in[68]: given the bipartite network G p = (X ^{+},X ^{},E), a link belongs to some of but not all maximum matchings (ordinary), iff, for an arbitrary maximum matching M, it belongs to either an even simple path which begins at a free node, or an even simple cycle. For the other links, the links which belong to M are critical and the links which do not belong to M are redundant. Based on this proposition, the critical, ordinary and redundant links could be correctively classified and avoid the enumeration of all the maximum matchings.
We used the link removing algorithm proposed by Régin[68] to classify the links in G. Given a maximum matching M in G _{ p }, we got two orientated bipartite networks G _{ d 1} = (X ^{+},X ^{},E _{ d 1}) and G _{ d 2} = (X ^{+},X ^{},E _{ d 2}), by orientating the bipartite network G _{ p } = (X ^{+},X ^{},E). G _{ d 1} was obtained by orientating the matching link$({X}_{i}^{+},{X}_{j}^{})$ from${X}_{i}^{+}$ to${X}_{j}^{}$, and the free link$({X}_{k}^{+},{X}_{l}^{})$ from${X}_{l}^{}$ to${X}_{k}^{+}$; G _{ d 2} was obtained in an opposite way of orientating links. We detected all simple paths which start from a free node in G _{ d 1} and G _{ d 2}, and then computed the strongly connected components in either G _{ d 1} or G _{ d 2}. The strongly connected components in G _{ d 1} or G _{ d 2} are simple circles because the links in maximum matching do not share same endpoints. If a link from G _{ d 1} or G _{ d 2} is in a simple path or a strongly connected component, then it is ordinary. For other links from G _{ d 1} or G _{ d 2}: the link is critical if it is in the maximum matching M; if not, it is redundant. The pseudocode of the algorithm to classify links is shown in Figure8.
Chisquare test
The common test statistics include Ztests, Ttests, Chisquared tests and Ftests. Ztests and Ttests are appropriate for comparing means under different conditions. Ftests are commonly used to decide whether groupings of data are meaningful by using analysis of variance. Chisquared tests are commonly applied to sets of categorical data for various purpose, one of which is to establish whether or not an observed frequency distribution differs from a expected distribution. In this work, we do not care about the mean or the variance of a data set. We only care about wether the observed frequency distribution of one typical set is different from that in the whole network, which is the expected distribution. Thus, we chose chisquare test to test significance.
Chisquare test is used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the expected data and the observed data in one or more categories. The observed data is denoted by O _{ i }, where i = 1,2,…,N, and N is the number of categories. The expected data is denoted by E _{ i }, and${E}_{i}={p}_{i}{\sum}_{i=1}^{N}{O}_{i}$, where p _{ i } is the expected percentage. The chisquare formula is defined as:
We take the comparison between the percentages of different degree (low, medium and high) in the set A and those in the whole network, to illustrate the process of chisquare test. There are three categories of metabolites, which are the low, medium and high degree metabolites. The observed data are the number of the low, medium and high degree metabolites in the set A, which are 248, 188 and 137, respectively. The expected percentages are the percentages of the low, medium and high degree metabolites in the whole network, which are 33.3%, 33.4% and 33.3%, respectively. The chisquare statistic is computed using the above chisquare formula, as shown in Table3. The chisquare statistic value here is 32.37.
After calculating the chisquare statistic value, we have to find the degrees of freedom. Degree of freedom refers to the number of percentage values that are free to vary, under the restriction that the sum of all the percentages are fixed. Obviously, the degree of freedom is N  1, if the number of categories is N. There are three categories in this example, so the degree of freedom is two.
With the degree of freedom 2 and the predetermined level of significance 0.05, we can find the table value for chisquare statistic from the chisquare table (http://www.unc.edu/~farkouh/usefull/chi.html) is 5.99. If the calculated chisquare value is equal to or greater than the table value, then the difference between the percentages among different sets is not due to chance alone. In this example, the calculated value of chisquare is 32.37, which is greater than the table value 5.99. It means that there is a significant difference between the fractions of the low, medium and high degree metabolites among the set A and those among the whole network.
Abbreviations
 HLMN:

Human liver metabolic network
 MDMS:

Minimum driver metabolites set
 UM:

Universal metabolites
 FEM:

Functional essential metabolites
 EUM:

Essentiality undiscovered metabolites.
References
 1.
Mato JM, MartínezChantar ML, Lu SC: Methionine metabolism and liver disease. Ann Rev Nutr. 2008, 28: 273293. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.28.061807.155438.
 2.
Wang Y, Hu Y, Chao C, Yuksel M, Colle I, Flavell RA, Ma Y, Yan H, Wen L: Role of IRAKM in alcohol induced liver injury. PloS One. 2013, 8 (2): 5708510.1371/journal.pone.0057085.
 3.
Nader N, Ng SSM, Wang Y, Abel BS, Chrousos GP, Kino T: Liver X receptors regulate the transcriptional activity of the glucocorticoid receptor: implications for the carbohydrate metabolism. PloS One. 2012, 7 (3): 2675110.1371/journal.pone.0026751.
 4.
Guan M, Xie L, Diao C, Wang N, Hu W, Zheng Y, Jin L, Yan Z, Gao H: Systemic perturbations of key metabolites in diabetic rats during the evolution of diabetes studied by urine metabonomics. PloS One. 2013, 8 (4): 6040910.1371/journal.pone.0060409.
 5.
Kitano H: Systems biology: a brief overview. Science. 2002, 295 (5560): 16621664. 10.1126/science.1069492.
 6.
Duarte NC, Becker SA, Jamshidi N, Thiele I, Mo ML, Vo TD, Srivas R, Palsson BØ: Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007, 104 (6): 177710.1073/pnas.0610772104.
 7.
Bordbar A, Palsson BO: Using the reconstructed genomescale human metabolic network to study physiology and pathology. J Intern Med. 2012, 271 (2): 131141. 10.1111/j.13652796.2011.02494.x.
 8.
Livnat Jerby TS, Ruppin E: Computational reconstruction of tissuespecific metabolic models application to human liver metabolism. Mol Syst Biol. 2010, 6 (1): 19.
 9.
Kauffman KJ, Prakash P, Edwards JS: Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003, 14 (5): 491496. 10.1016/j.copbio.2003.08.001.
 10.
Agren R, Bordel S, Mardinoglu A, Pornputtapong N, Nookaew I, Nielsen J: Reconstruction of genomescale active metabolic networks for 69 human cell types and 16 cancer types using init. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012, 8 (5): 100251810.1371/journal.pcbi.1002518.
 11.
Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL: The largescale organization of metabolic networks. Nature. 2000, 407 (6804): 651654. 10.1038/35036627.
 12.
Asgari Y, SalehzadehYazdi A, Schreiber F, MasoudiNejad A: Controllability in cancer metabolic networks according to drug targets as driver nodes. PloS One. 2013, 8 (11): 7939710.1371/journal.pone.0079397.
 13.
Iyer S, Killingback T, Sundaram B, Wang Z: Attack robustness and centrality of complex networks. PloS One. 2013, 8 (4): 5961310.1371/journal.pone.0059613.
 14.
Rajapakse I, Groudine M, Mesbahi M: Dynamics and control of statedependent networks for probing genomic organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011, 108 (42): 1725717262. 10.1073/pnas.1113249108.
 15.
Hintze A, Adami C: Evolution of complex modular biological networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008, 4 (2): 2310.1371/journal.pcbi.0040023.
 16.
Liu YY, Slotine JJ, Barabási AL: Controllability of complex networks. Nature. 2011, 473 (7346): 167173. 10.1038/nature10011.
 17.
Pu CL, Pei WJ, Michaelson A: Robustness analysis of network controllability. Physica AStat Mech Appl. 2012, 391 (18): 44204425. 10.1016/j.physa.2012.04.019.
 18.
Lin CT: Structural controllability. IEEE Trans Automatic Control. 1974, 19 (3): 201208. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100557.
 19.
Shields R, Pearson J: Structural controllability of multiinput linear systems. IEEE Trans on Automatic Control. 1976, 21 (2): 203212. 10.1109/TAC.1976.1101198.
 20.
Tang Y, Gao H, Zou W, Kurths J: Identifying controlling nodes in neuronal networks in different scales. PloS One. 2012, 7 (7): 4137510.1371/journal.pone.0041375.
 21.
Osborn O, Olefsky JM: The cellular and signaling networks linking the immune system and metabolism in disease. Nat Med. 2012, 18 (3): 363374. 10.1038/nm.2627.
 22.
Lumeng CN, Saltiel AR: Inflammatory links between obesity and metabolic disease. J Clin Invest. 2011, 121 (6): 211110.1172/JCI57132.
 23.
DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB: The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008, 7 (1): 1120. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002.
 24.
Farrugia DC, Ford HE, Cunningham D, Danenberg KD, Danenberg PV, Brabender J, McVicar AD, Aherne G. W, Hardcastle A, McCarthy K, Jackman AL: Thymidylate synthase expression in advanced colorectal cancer predicts for response to raltitrexed. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (2): 792801.
 25.
Almaas E: Biological impacts and context of network theory. J Exp Biol. 2007, 210 (9): 15481558. 10.1242/jeb.003731.
 26.
Galil Z: Efficient algorithms for finding maximum matching in graphs. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR). 1986, 18 (1): 2338. 10.1145/6462.6502.
 27.
Zdeborová L, Mézard M: The number of matchings in random graphs. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp. 2006, 2006 (05): 0500310.1088/17425468/2006/05/P05003.
 28.
Jia T, Barabási AL: Control capacity and a random sampling method in exploring controllability of complex networks. Sci Rep. 2013, 3 (2354): 16.
 29.
Jia T, Liu Y. Y, Csóka E, Pósfai M, Slotine J. J, Barabási AL: Emergence of bimodality in controlling complex networks. Nat Commun. 2013, 4 (2002): 16.
 30.
Mayeda H: On structural controllability theorem. IEEE Trans Automatic Control. 1981, 26 (3): 795798. 10.1109/TAC.1981.1102707.
 31.
Weinstein SJ, Hartman TJ, StolzenbergSolomon R, Pietinen P, Barrett MJ, Taylor PR, Virtamo J, Albanes D: Null association between prostate cancer and serum folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, and homocysteine. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2003, 12 (11): 12711272.
 32.
Wang Y, Wang T, Shi X, Wan D, Zhang P, He X, Gao P, Yang S, Gu J, Xu G: Analysis of acetylcholine, choline and butyrobetaine in human liver tissues by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008, 47 (4): 870875.
 33.
Long C: Identification of essential metabolites in metabolite networks. Electronic thesis or dissertation. The University of British Columbia; 2012
 34.
Tucker JM, Townsend DM: Alphatocopherol: roles in prevention and therapy of human disease. Biomed Pharmacother. 2005, 59 (7): 380387. 10.1016/j.biopha.2005.06.005.
 35.
Vadlapudi AD, Vadlapatla RK, Pal D, Mitra AK: Functional and molecular aspects of biotin uptake via SMVT in human corneal epithelial (HCEC) and retinal pigment epithelial (D407) cells. AAPS J. 2012, 14 (4): 111.
 36.
Huang X, Dai J, Fournier J, Ali A. M, Zhang Q, Frenkel K: Ferrous ion autoxidation and its chelation in ironloaded human liver HepG2 cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002, 32 (1): 8492. 10.1016/S08915849(01)007705.
 37.
Necas J, Bartosikova L, Brauner P, Kolar J: Hyaluronic acid (hyaluronan): a review. Veterinarni Med. 2008, 53 (8): 397411.
 38.
Colombo G, Lardy HA: Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (guanosine 5’triphosphate) from rat liver cytosol. divalent cation involvement in the decarboxylation reactions. Biochemistry. 1981, 20 (10): 27582767. 10.1021/bi00513a009.
 39.
Iwata S, Hori T, Sato N, Hirota K, Sasada T, Mitsui A, Hirakawa T, Yodoi J: Adult T cell leukemia (ATL)derived factor/human thioredoxin prevents apoptosis of lymphoid cells induced by Lcystine and glutathione depletion: possible involvement of thiolmediated redox regulation in apoptosis caused by prooxidant state. J Immunol. 1997, 158 (7): 31083117.
 40.
Lonardoni MVC, Russo M, Jancar S: Essential role of plateletactivating factor in control of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis infection. Infect Immun. 2000, 68 (11): 63556361. 10.1128/IAI.68.11.63556361.2000.
 41.
Souza DG, Fagundes CT, Sousa LP, Amaral FA, Souza RS, Souza AL, Kroon EG, Sachs D, Cunha FQ, Bukin E, Atrasheuskaya A, Ignatyev G, Teixeira MM: Essential role of plateletactivating factor receptor in the pathogenesis of Dengue virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009, 106 (33): 1413814143. 10.1073/pnas.0906467106.
 42.
Duce AM, Ortíz P, Cabrero C, Mato JM: SadenosylLmethionine synthetase and phospholipid methyltransferase are inhibited in human cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2005, 8 (1): 6568.
 43.
Nakamura SI, Kiyohara Y, Jinnai H, Hitomi T, Ogino C, Yoshida K, Nishizuka Y: Mammalian phospholipase d: phosphatidylethanolamine as an essential component. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996, 93 (9): 43004304. 10.1073/pnas.93.9.4300.
 44.
Saliba KJ, Horner HA, Kirk K: Transport and metabolism of the essential vitamin pantothenic acid in human erythrocytes infected with the malaria parasite plasmodium falciparum. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (17): 1019010195. 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10190.
 45.
AlLahham SH, Peppelenbosch MP, Roelofsen H, Vonk RJ, Venema K: Biological effects of propionic acid in humans; metabolism, potential applications and underlying mechanisms. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2010, 1801 (11): 11751183. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.07.007.
 46.
Guillon F, Champ MMJ: Carbohydrate fractions of legumes: uses in human nutrition and potential for health. Br J Nutr. 2002, 88 (S3): 293306. 10.1079/BJN2002720.
 47.
Pickens MK, Yan JS, Ng RK, Ogata H, Grenert JP, Beysen C, Turner SM, Maher JJ: Dietary sucrose is essential to the development of liver injury in the methioninecholinedeficient model of steatohepatitis. J Lipid Res. 2009, 50 (10): 20722082. 10.1194/jlr.M900022JLR200.
 48.
Yen CLE, Monetti M, Burri BJ, Farese Jr RV: The triacylglycerol synthesis enzyme DGAT1 also catalyzes the synthesis of diacylglycerols, waxes, and retinyl esters. J Lipid Res. 2005, 46 (7): 15021511. 10.1194/jlr.M500036JLR200.
 49.
Wagner KH, KamalEldin A, Elmadfa I: Gammatocopherol–an underestimated vitamin?. Ann Nutr Metab. 2004, 48 (3): 169188. 10.1159/000079555.
 50.
Singh I, Turner A, Sinclair A, Li D, Hawley J: Effects of gammatocopherol supplementation on thrombotic risk factors. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007, 16 (3): 422428.
 51.
Bataller R, Brenner DA: Hepatic stellate cells as a target for the treatment of liver fibrosis. Seminars in Liver Disease. Volume 21. 2001, 437452.
 52.
Martelli C, Martino AD, Marinari E, Marsili M, Castillo IP: Identifying essential genes in escherichia coli from a metabolic optimization principle. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009, 106 (8): 26072611. 10.1073/pnas.0813229106.
 53.
Brooks S, Morgan B: Optimization using simulated annealing. The Statistician. 1995, 44 (2): 241257. 10.2307/2348448.
 54.
Xu G, Bennett L, Papageorgiou LG, Tsoka S: Module detection in complex networks using integer optimisation. Algorithms Mol Biol. 2010, 5: 3610.1186/17487188536.
 55.
Abraham K, Sameith K, Falciani F: Improving functional module detection. Bioinformatics, 1517 June 2009, Cleveland. OCCBIO’09. Ohio Collaborative Conference On,. 2009, IEEE, 110115.
 56.
Wang Z, Zhu XG, Chen Y, Li Y, Liu L: Comparison of modularization methods in application to different biological networks. Data Mining Bioinform. 2006, 4316: 185195.
 57.
Guimera R, Amaral LAN: Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature. 2005, 433 (7028): 895900. 10.1038/nature03288.
 58.
Richards JAS: New signaling pathways for hormones and cyclic adenosine 3’, 5’monophosphate action in endocrine cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2001, 15 (2): 209218.
 59.
Clauset A, Newman MEJ, Moore C: Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys Rev E. 2004, 70 (6): 066111
 60.
Orth J, Conrad T, Na J, Lerman J, Nam H, Feist A, Palsson B: A comprehensive genomescale reconstruction of escherichia coli metabolism–2011. Mol Syst Biol. 2011, 7 (1): 19.
 61.
Ke Q, Yang Rn, Ye F, Wu Q, Li L, Bu H: Impairment of liver regeneration by the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid in mice. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2012, 13 (9): 695706. 10.1631/jzus.B1100362.
 62.
Lu SC, MartínezChantar ML, Mato JM: Methionine adenosyltransferase and sadenosylmethionine in alcoholic liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006, 21 (s3): 6164. 10.1111/j.14401746.2006.04575.x.
 63.
Famili I, Förster J, Nielsen J, Palsson BO: Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraintbased analysis of a genomescale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003, 100 (23): 1313413139. 10.1073/pnas.2235812100.
 64.
Liu YY, Slotine JJ, Barabási AL: Control centrality and hierarchical structure in complex networks. Plos One. 2012, 7 (9): 4445910.1371/journal.pone.0044459.
 65.
Yu W, Chen G, Cao M, Kurths J: Secondorder consensus for multiagent systems with directed topologies and nonlinear dynamics. IEEE Trans on Syst Man Cybernet Part B. 2010, 40 (3): 881891.
 66.
Guimerà R, SalesPardo M, Amaral LAN: Module identification in bipartite and directed networks. Phys Rev E. 2007, 76 (3): 036102
 67.
Hopcroft JE, Karp RM: An nˆ5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM J Comput. 1973, 2 (4): 225231. 10.1137/0202019.
 68.
Régin JC: A filtering algorithm for constraints of difference in CSPs. Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Volume 1. 1994, Seattle, Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 362362.
Acknowledgements
We thank Yangyu Liu for useful discussions and suggestions; Roger Guimerà for providing the tool "netcartow" to detect modules and classify the metabolites in the human liver metabolic network. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61033003, 91130034, and 61320106005).
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
XL and LP conceived and designed the studies and wrote the manuscript. XL collected and analyzed the data and performed the experiments. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Human liver metabolic network
 Controllability
 Driver metabolite